Hot Pink List

Several Trump staffers quit after not getting paid

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,696
21
38
Vice has images of the various newspaper articles identifying Fred Trump as a participant in a KKK rally:

http://www.vice.com/read/all-the-ev...-fred-trumps-alleged-involvement-with-the-kkk

Trump's racist practices of refusing to rent to blacks and refusing to hire them were well documented on the other thread. He lost multiple lawsuits over those issues.
As Boing Boing pointed out, the Times account simply names Fred Trump as one of the seven individuals arrested at the rally, and it states that he was released without charges, leaving room for the possibility that he "may have been an innocent bystander, falsely named, or otherwise the victim of mistaken identity during or following a chaotic event."
This is about a 21 year old Fred Trump in the 1930s.

We are all partly a product of our time. The article goes on to state that Fred Trump's informal discriminatory housing policies likely benefitted his business since it was being financed by the government.

Finally, it's funny how you louts never launch the same abusive criticisms of people like the late Senator Byrd who was an actual proven Klan member. If you can forgive (or forget) the history of people like him, why do you hold Trump to a different standard. If Jesse Jackson can get beyond it, surely you can.

And For the love of God, stop conflating immigration policy with racism.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
This is about a 21 year old Fred Trump in the 1930s.
Let's be clear: in the Klan.

And it was Donald who was repeatedly taken to court and forced to pay reparations for refusing to rent to blacks, refusing to hire blacks, etc.

Byrd very publicly admitted to and renounced his racist past and became a passionate advocate for black civil rights. Trump has done nothing like that, he's quietly hoping people will forget. Maybe if he stands up and apologizes for his racist past you can compare him to Byrd--not until then.

Like father, like son.
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,696
21
38
Let's be clear: in the Klan.

And it was Donald who was repeatedly taken to court and forced to pay reparations for refusing to rent to blacks, refusing to hire blacks, etc.

Like father, like son.
Nothing definitive states that Fred Trump was in the Klan. I guess you also missed the context that putting things in 1930 perspective should have given you.

There are hurdles to businesses transitioning from one generation to another. When you come to grips with the complexities and intricacies of large businesses you'll understand that a few lawsuits is a part of doing business.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Nothing definitive states that Fred Trump was in the Klan. I guess you also missed the context that putting things in 1930 perspective should have given you.

There are hurdles to businesses transitioning from one generation to another. When you come to grips with the complexities and intricacies of large businesses you'll understand that a few lawsuits is a part of doing business.
What is it about 1930 that you think made it OK to be in the Klan? And this was in New York, the unionist heartland, not Alabama. Being in a Klan march was newsworthy racism.

And again, it wasn't Fred who had to pay big settlements for racist behavior, it was Donald. And not in 1930, in the 80s.

Oh, and as of now white supremacists are big Trump backers--welcome at his rallies that famously throw out anyone he disagrees with.
 

MattRoxx

Call me anti-fascist
Nov 13, 2011
6,752
3
0
I get around.
I don't know wigglee. Maybe we should let them all into Canada too, so they can do all the jobs that Canadians won't do. That would help our economy, right?
This thread's gone off the rails as far as the OP but this article was interesting.

Most Foreign Workers Hired Without Proof No Canadian Could Be Found: Studyhttp://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2016/0...rence-board_n_11935124.html?utm_hp_ref=canada

As the federal Liberals prepare for what’s expected to be an expansion of Canada’s foreign worker programs, a new study says businesses have been increasingly hiring foreign nationals without proving no Canadians could be found to do the job.

The report also says the new free trade deals negotiated by Canada will further increase the number of foreign nationals hired without seeking a Canadian, if the agreements are ratified.

The Conference Board of Canada study released this week found that, between 2010 and 2014, there was a small decline in the number of people coming into Canada under parts of the foreign worker program that require proving the employer couldn’t find a Canadian.

But from 2004 to 2014, there was a tripling in the number of workers who get permits that don’t require seeking a Canadian for the job. More than 194,000 such permits were signed in 2014, roughly double the number of permits that require seeking a Canadian.
Overall, 360,000 temporary work permits were signed in 2014, an increase of 64 per cent from a decade earlier, the Conference Board report said.

A recent Nanos poll found three-quarters of Canadians oppose or "somewhat oppose" allowing foreign workers to be employed while Canadians qualified for the same jobs are looking for work...

Dearth of data on foreign workers in Canada

The study criticized what it saw as a dearth of data on foreign workers in Canada, which "hinders policy-makers' ability to make informed decisions that are critical to the country’s economic performance."

They called the IMPs "especially problematic" because those work permits are not subject to the same reporting requirements as those under the TFW program.

"Consequently, it is difficult to know the types of jobs open work permit holders are taking in Canada and what effect they may be having on the domestic labour market."

The federal Liberals have recently signalled that they plan to expand Canada’s foreign-worker programs, pending a review scheduled to be released later this month.

During a trip to China last month, Immigration Minister John McCallum indicated his government wants to see a larger flow of migrants from China into Canada — not just temporary foreign workers, but students, tourists and others as well.

In terms of the flow of Chinese nationals into Canada, “we want to get it even bigger,” McCallum said.

The Conference Board noted that two free trade deals the Liberals aim to sign would further expand the number of foreign workers allowed to work in Canada without proof a Canadian couldn’t be found...

The Conference Board of Canada’s vice-president for industry and business strategy, Michael Bloom, said "balance" is the key to building a proper foreign worker program.

"The government has a legitimate role to monitor the TFWP to ensure domestic workers are given priority in the labour market," he said in a statement. "Employers across Canada would like enough flexibility to fill their temporary employment needs when domestic workers are unavailable to do the job."

But, he added, "The Canadian public wants assurance that foreign workers are supplementing, rather than supplanting domestic workers. And protections must be in place to ensure temporary foreign workers are treated fairly by employers."
 

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
10,522
2,481
113
A few? Why not a flood? Let's bring in millions more. We'll all be better off for it, right?

Why would I jump on it? I'm one of those Canadians that won't do those jobs, remember?

I feel sorry for you. You live with a mind so small, confused, and contradictory.
of course a flood would be foolish, but don't let that stop you now,.....you never have.
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,696
21
38
of course a flood would be foolish, but don't let that stop you now,.....you never have.
So you agree with Trump (and Hillary AND Bill Clinton) on the illegal immigration problem in the US. Great!
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
So you agree with Trump (and Hillary AND Bill Clinton) on the illegal immigration problem in the US. Great!
Let's be clear what you just did: you asked somebody if they agree with one extreme position, namely flooding the US with millions more illegals than are already here. Then you insisted anybody who disagrees with that extremist view must therefore support your extremist view on the other side.

Most people are in the moderate camp here. Most people want to find a way to keep American businesses that rely on illegals afloat, while finding a way for the illegals to normalize their status. Few people share your extremist view.
 
Toronto Escorts