Thank you Gina for the offer of a 6.3% discount when my time was shorted by 18.3% by your own admission, 25% by my watch, I suppose that is "fair". That being said, you are inferring that a very "concerning matter" happened while in the room, I have asked you privately to elaborate, since I am scratching my head as to what that could be. You also refer to "two specific and completely understandable reasons", which lead me to understand that there in fact 2 events that caused her concern, can you please help me understand what apparently happened? I have no idea. Also, you seem to be offering reasons as to why it was cut short, then make a point of stating it was unintentional...which was it? One would think if there were legitimate reasons to be cut short I would have been told at the time...did she claim to have done that?
No one wants a he said she said game, but I find your post inflammatory and accusatory and I think if you are publicly going to state that I did something to make Serena short the meeting (intentionally or unintentionally...I can't figure it out) then I have the right to know what I did to instigate the "concerning matter".
For the record, I would not characterize the service she provided despite whatever transgression I did as "above average", not sure how you can make that claim...From the receiver of the service I would call it just average.
And yes, I do still feel wronged, but I do not "thank" any members of this forum for feeling that way, in fact to the contrary, I appreciate the support of some of the members, please do not speak for me in the future.
No one wants a he said she said game, but I find your post inflammatory and accusatory and I think if you are publicly going to state that I did something to make Serena short the meeting (intentionally or unintentionally...I can't figure it out) then I have the right to know what I did to instigate the "concerning matter".
For the record, I would not characterize the service she provided despite whatever transgression I did as "above average", not sure how you can make that claim...From the receiver of the service I would call it just average.
And yes, I do still feel wronged, but I do not "thank" any members of this forum for feeling that way, in fact to the contrary, I appreciate the support of some of the members, please do not speak for me in the future.
WOW!
Congratulations!
Assumptions, hostility, bullying, false accusations, incorrect statements and claims that have festered into the ridiculous now...
After speaking with Serena and getting her side of the story and after confirming that Ryan was indeed shorted 11 minutes of actual session time on the hour and then after seeing the spectacle that this thread has become I will say this:
Ryan's time was far from intentionally shorted...there are large wall clocks in every room...Serena is astonished by the whole incident, as am I, in light of the circumstances & two specific and completely understandable reasons why Ryan's session ran unintentionally short & one very specific reason why Serena should be commended for providing an above average service regardless of a very concerning matter to her in the room at the time...none of which Serena should be persecuted for...and Vibe will happily refund Ryan the $10 for.
Without knowing both sides of an issue and without speaking privately to the parties concerned and instead creating a public outcry of ill-informed supporters...everyone still remains hostile, ignorant and bitter about a session they have no clue about.
Outstanding Customer Service and Complaint Resolution has always been our strong point....but this is just bullying now and we will not appease it...and yes Ryan unfortunately still feels wronged now...and we are sorry for that...he has many of you to thank & if this forum had not been involved a better understanding & a happy ending could have easily been found last week![]()
Please refer to comment #16 again in this thread for more of an insight into MA sessions & why yours may not go as expected.
Last edited:

