That's what he says, and don't discount it after all "everything is relative" is such a hard position to defend.johnnyhandsome said:Mensa status???? Does he belong to Mensa??? You are kidding, right??
OTB
That's what he says, and don't discount it after all "everything is relative" is such a hard position to defend.johnnyhandsome said:Mensa status???? Does he belong to Mensa??? You are kidding, right??
There is nothing Christian about his attitudes towards Muslims - or even his sense of superiority.The_Jaded_One said:Come on Shake!! His radical beliefs are born from his Christian upbringing. I am not saying all Christians are like that, am I?
SO what do you think came first, Johnny's neo-con ideology or his Christian beliefs? His Christian superiority complex gives rise to his neo-con ideology and his xenophobia.
That indeed didnt take long. Technically speaking Sarin is a WMD and it doesnt matter if the bomb contained just a little because whomever had the stuff probably has access to more. A lot more I assume.The_Jaded_One said:Do you guys ever think? The Republican administration accused Saddam of having WMD. Why wouldn't Saddam have used them before he was caught? Do you honestly think the Republican administration is above planting WMD evidence, when it makes them look extremely bad for not having found them and that was their flimsy justification for going to war? Yeah, they are above planting WMD but not above torturing Iraqis (copper green ever heard of it?).
Besides they haven't found WMD and how many months has it been? Only an idiot would consider the homemade sarin bomb that went off as a WMD.
This sounds like a strong possibility. Question is though how many more unmarked shells are out there to be unwittingly used against coalition troops???loaded said:BBC article:
"However, a senior coalition source has told the BBC the round does not signal the discovery of weapons of mass destruction or the escalation of insurgent activity.
He said the round dated back to the Iran-Iraq war and coalition officials were not sure whether the fighters even knew what it contained."
you are one naive, self-conceited, arrogant individualjohnnyhandsome said:Smallpox can also leave someone pockmarked for the rest of their life after they have contracted the disease, but from what I hear about your facial appearance, Shake, a few pockmarks will just be a another drop in the bucket.
And I use the term 'Facial Appearance' loosely.
loaded said:you are one humble, cool and handsome individual
That's not a reasonable assertion. That's like saying if I sell you a key of coke I probably have access to a hundred thousand kilos of it. Not likely (logistics and command control don't work like that).johnnyhandsome said:That indeed didnt take long. Technically speaking Sarin is a WMD and it doesnt matter if the bomb contained just a little because whomever had the stuff probably has access to more. A lot more I assume.
I didn't say that. What I said is that if the USA finds WMD (I mean not a little homemade sarin bomb) then the possibility of a plant is quite possible especially when factoring in motivation.johnnyhandsome said:Also your "Bush planted the Sarin theory" is virtually impossible because to "plant" Sarin in Iraq you need to involve a number of players and if even ONE jumps ship and goes to the media with the story Bush would be impeached or perhaps even put on trial. [/B]
Have you been attending the Papasmerf English classes again?Goober Mcfly said:....
I mean if they can get sarin gas into Iraq under American occupation, why not when they had free reign of travel back then?
The fact is that religion can easily be used as a divisive manipulation tool to focus hate and dumb down the masses. All religion is contradictory to some degree and you can practically take any message out of religious texts that you want to and that suits your purposes (so it does in fact get perverted often enough from what the "ideal" message should be - i.e. love and tolerance). George Bush's initial rallying cry after 9/11 was "Operation Infinite Justice" and he referred to the mission as a crusade. As to your PS statement, perhaps it could be said that Neo-con politicians are no more religious than the average North American but they rely on a pretty big religious following for support and hence set their policies to appeal to them.The Shake said:There is nothing Christian about his attitudes towards Muslims - or even his sense of superiority.
Christ taught us that we are but humble servants of God. Obviously, you weren't implying that all Christians think like John, but even to suggest that there is causality between a Christian upbringing and such opinions is wrong-headed.
<snip>
PS - I think you'd find that Neo-cons are no more religious, and perhaps even less so, than the average North American.
I think we are seeing quite a bit of this in the Middle East these days.The_Jaded_One said:The fact is that religion can easily be used as a divisive manipulation tool to focus hate and dumb down the masses. ......
As much of a supporter of this war as I am, one shell does not make a WMD threat. I don't think it addresses the justified concerns of, did this war need to be fought and did it need to be fought now.bbking said:I don't think anybody questions the fact that Saddam had WMD, the question was if he destroyed them as he said he did to the UN. This shell is helpful to those of us who think that he had more than a few on hand.
Johnny - No need to kinda apologize, they made me chuckle. I thought it was a fairly clever way to tie an insult to the whole germ warfare theme.johnnyhandsome said:Also, Shake, my comments on your looks werent very nice so I kinda apologize. I dont know what you look like and I was just trying to get under your skin
I have to agree ............but that holds true for muslim or christian ......jihad (sp?) or crusade .The_Jaded_One said:The fact is that religion can easily be used as a divisive manipulation tool to focus hate and dumb down the masses. All religion is contradictory to some degree and you can practically take any message out of religious texts that you want to and that suits your purposes (so it does in fact get perverted often enough from what the "ideal" message should be - i.e. love and tolerance). .............. he referred to the mission as a crusade.
Sounds like television...The_Jaded_One said:The fact is that religion can easily be used as a divisive manipulation tool to focus hate and dumb down the masses.
I'm not so sure about that. In Canada, the relationship between neo-cons and social conservatives could best be described as a tenuous marriage of convenience. For example, many religious conservatives were appalled by the basically amoral politics practiced by the Mike Harris government in Ontario.As to your PS statement, perhaps it could be said that Neo-con politicians are no more religious than the average North American but they rely on a pretty big religious following for support and hence set their policies to appeal to them.
Damned if you do and damned if you don't. If Bush hadnt gone into Iraq and Saddam had harboured Al-queda or some other terrorist group, there could have been some type of proliferation of a WMD like Anthrax or Ebola. Had Saddam used this on a mass-scale in a large city like New York everybody would have screamed: "Why didnt Bush go into Iraq to stop this threat"??onthebottom said:did this war need to be fought and did it need to be fought now.
OTB
And theres a strong possibility that the war in Iraq (which again has no direct connection to Al-qaeda, unless you are still using the good intelligence information that Bush used to justify this war) may end even more lives, may promote even more terrorism, etc.johnnyhandsome said:possibility that Bush may have saved a lot lof lives by stamping out Al Queda or at least attempting to stamp them out.
OBL and his followers were trained and financed by 2 governments: USA and Saudi Arabia, you should know the monster you create.....there was a threat and you failed to recognize itjohnnyhandsome said:Damned if you do and damned if you don't. If Bush hadnt gone into Iraq and Saddam had harboured Al-queda or some other terrorist group, there could have been some type of proliferation of a WMD like Anthrax or Ebola. Had Saddam used this on a mass-scale in a large city like New York everybody would have screamed: "Why didnt Bush go into Iraq to stop this threat"??
Then you would have gotten congressional hearings like they have about 9/11 right now...etc...etc.
There's a strong possibility that Bush may have saved a lot lof lives by stamping out Al Queda or at least attempting to stamp them out.