Really, manipulated? Who was it that threw out the point that the nurse must have had a mental problem?i'm not surprised that youve been manipulated, hopping on the bandwagon
You really are a piece of work and prove it every day. It's not media manipulation. It's you can't read, but that's been known for a while.those australian raadio DJ's are gonna get a bad media backlash. I don;t think what they did was wrong this nurse probably had previous mental issues and was obviously unfit to work. If she was really excellent and well respected she would have laughed it off and not killed herself
To which I have a two word reply: Eggshell plaintiff.The prank alone was harmless. It would not cause anyone to commit suicide.
Apparently they were shorthanded.nurses work swtichboard?
i'm not surprised that youve been manipulated, hopping on the bandwagon
ok, after reading another article it wasnt the second nurse who gave out all the private info who committed suicide, it was the first nurse working the switchboard lol. THE MEDIA HAS TRICKED US AGAIN! OH THAT POOR NURSE WHO GAVE OUT ALL THAT PRIVATE INFO SHE MUST HAVE BEEN SO DISTRAUGHT! How the fuck could the first one commit suicide she basically did nothing
I don't think this has been manipulated by the media at all, but you seem to be making stuff up.you got it all wrong, it wasnt the nurse who did all the talking who committed suicide, the one who gave out private info. it was the first nurse who transferred the call to the second nurse. its the second nurses job to verify the details and then proceed. the media has spun this if you quickly glance and read an article it gives you the wrong impression of who actually died. The media is horrible now these 2 radio dj's are gonna get all this hate from the ignorant masses and will probably lose their job
Don't buy MSOG's shit for a second. The first article in this thread made it perfectly clear which nurse did what.What makes you think the other article you read is the accurate one and not the one BR was quoting from? I'm quite familiar with the media's sleazy approach to business and that's why I'm not too quick to judge what they write until I have confirmation and consistency from several sources. BR's quote might be wrong, or right, but then again so could your source. We need to hear more before passing judgement.
Clear as day to anyone who chose to read it.Miss Saldanha answered the call and put them through to the ward where the Duchess was being cared for, another nurse there updated them on her condition.
:blah: :blah: :blah:Keep it in the back of your mind - but it all helps to raise emotional connection and awareness about a lackluster purposeless monarchy.
The Canadian legal system would view the case a little differently.To which I have a two word reply: Eggshell plaintiff.
You take your victim as your victim is, not as you would like them to be. This "prank" was far from harmless, and their "apology" is at best halfhearted (we apologize for the inconvenience we caused) and in fact not an apology at all rather an expression of regret that their "bright idea" had backfired on them.
a) I work in healthcareI don't think this has been manipulated by the media at all, but you seem to be making stuff up.
Do you have the hospital communications manual in front of you that confirms that it was the second nurse's job to verify the details? Or did you pull that out of your ass to support your position?
There is however some evidence that this nurse was deeply disturbed the the fact she put through the crank call.
And even if the nurse's response is disproportionate (as I said above) this remains a fraud and an invasion of privacy. For a free marketer (supposedly) you sure place no value on fraud and privacy.
You make yourself into more of a joke every day.
You are the guy who claims to work in healthcare but praised Cuba's private healthcare system, so what?a) I work in healthcare
b) its common sense that the nurse who has the patient info be the one to verify who shes talking too before she gives out that information.
The media is giving accurate facts, very accurate facts.and yes ive looked at a few articles its quite clear who died but the media is making it look to the average reader with a 5 second attention span that it was the nurse who gave out the private info that died. I guarantee you that at work today or tomorrow you will hear all of your colleagues spew the misinformation.
what they did was hilarious and im wondering since when did the world all of a sudden lose its sense of humour? if these radio dj's get fired then almost every other radio dj should get fired as well.You are the guy who claims to work in healthcare but praised Cuba's private healthcare system, so what?
I have discovered dozens of hospitals and find that they don't even have similar standards on how to restrain dangerous patients let alone telephone communications or transfer protocols...and you think you know how this is done in England.
Do you agree what they did was a fraud and invasion of privacy?
But it is not a fact that she was a nurse?Read a few more of the initial publications - if you can find them. They were quite unclear.
Recent publications show its the first call taker:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...n-who-answered-Kate-hoax-commits-suicide.html
Anyone who heard the prank would not be thinking that a Nurse was the initial call taker - she sounds like disinterested switchboard. Yet nurse is what she is and exploited in the headlines.
How lackluster would it be to say: Pranked call taker commits suicide (which is a fact)
Perhaps you should go to this young lady's funeral and remind people just how funny it is.what they did was hilarious and im wondering since when did the world all of a sudden lose its sense of humour? if these radio dj's get fired then almost every other radio dj should get fired as well.
Really, who is going to charge them? Not the British government, because they were Australia.yes it was an invasion of privacy technically, fraud is abit of a stretch. believe me if they did anything criminal they will be charged first they are being executed by the media
yes this is another good point, they are referring to her as a nurse to purposely confuse readers into believing she was kate middletons nurse. they should be referring to her as the switchboard operatorRead a few more of the initial publications - if you can find them. They were quite unclear.
Recent publications show its the first call taker:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...n-who-answered-Kate-hoax-commits-suicide.html
Anyone who heard the prank would not be thinking that a Nurse was the initial call taker - she sounds like disinterested switchboard. Yet nurse is what she is and exploited in the headlines.
How lackluster would it be to say: Pranked call taker commits suicide (which is a fact)
I would think impersonating one of the world's most famous couple for personal gain is considered identity fraud.yes it was an invasion of privacy technically, fraud is abit of a stretch. believe me if they did anything criminal they will be charged first they are being executed by the media
Really, who is going to charge them? Not the British government, because they were Australia.
I guess you like the media when they lie to perform a "prank" but you don't like them when they tell the truth about a story.
Strange world you live in. As usual.
