Right-wing terrorism vs. Islamic terrorism - which one is the greater global threat??

[Phil C. McNasty]

Islamists kill 150 men, women and children in Mali: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...lls-150-mali-islamist-insurgency-intensifies/


Updated tally:

Muslims: 24 attacks - 302 deaths
Right-wingers: 0 attacks - 0 deaths
Islamophobes: 0 attacks - 0 deaths

 

[Frankfooter]

Islamists kill 150 men, women and children in Mali: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...lls-150-mali-islamist-insurgency-intensifies/


Updated tally:

Muslims: 24 attacks - 302 deaths
Right-wingers: 0 attacks - 0 deaths
Islamophobes: 0 attacks - 0 deaths

From your article:

The raid appeared to be a reprisal for an attack carried out by a pro-government Dogon militia elsewhere in the Mopti region in March that killed 157 Fulani villagers.

Funny how those 157 killed aren't on your list anywhere.
Still just an Islamaphobic tally, isn't it?

 

[canada-man]

Christians flee homes as Islamist terrorists murder 29 in Burkina Faso in twin attacks

Christians are fleeing for their lives in northern Burkina Faso after twin attacks by Islamist extremists on 9 and 10 June left at least 29 people dead, according to Barnabas Fund contacts.

Nineteen people were murdered in the town of Arbinda on Sunday 9 June and reports are coming in of a further ten slaughtered in nearby Namentenga province the next day.

“There is no Christian anymore in this town [Arbinda],” said a Barnabas Fund contact. He added that 19 people were killed and that the entire population of Christians had fled for their safety.

He said, “It's proven that they were looking for Christians. Families who hide Christians are killed. Arbinda had now lost in total no less than 100 people within six months.”

https://barnabasfund.org/en/news/ch...sts-murder-29-in-burkina-faso-in-twin-attacks

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

https://barnabasfund.org/en/news/ch...sts-murder-29-in-burkina-faso-in-twin-attacks

The Islamist militants’ murderous rampage began on 28 April in Silgadji, when gunman rounded up a pastor, his son and four of his congregation and demanded they deny their Christian faith and convert to Islam. When they refused they were executed one-by-one

Here you go. Here's your religion of peace

 

[Frankfooter]

Here you go. Here's your religion of peace

Islamaphobe.

'Christians' have killed way more Muslims then the other way around, yet you would never accuse Christians of being a 'religion of peace'.

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

Suicide bomber kills 11 in Afghanistan: https://www.afp.com/en/news/3954/suicide-bomber-kills-11-eastern-afghanistan-doc-1hh46z2


Updated tally:

Muslims: 25 attacks - 313 deaths
Right-wingers: 0 attacks - 0 deaths
Islamophobes: 0 attacks - 0 deaths

 

[doggystyle99]

Suicide bomber kills 11 in Afghanistan: https://www.afp.com/en/news/3954/suicide-bomber-kills-11-eastern-afghanistan-doc-1hh46z2

Updated tally:

Muslims: 25 attacks - 313 deaths
Right-wingers: 0 attacks - 0 deaths
Islamophobes: 0 attacks - 0 deaths

I am trying to find the logic behind how you are keeping track of these attacks but your tracking is invalid.
As you are keeping track of attacks in war regions by groups who are fighting one another but yet you're only keeping track of one side of the attacks that are taken. There is absolutely no logic in that, but hey keep going you've reached the resident Islamaphobe level of Zeibetter. Congrats.

 

[Frankfooter]

I am trying to find the logic behind how you are keeping track of these attacks but your tracking is invalid.
As you are keeping track of attacks in war regions by groups who are fighting one another but yet you're only keeping track of one side of the attacks that are taken. There is absolutely no logic in that, but hey keep going you've reached the resident Islamaphobe level of Zeibetter. Congrats.

Yes, Phil includes countries at war but won't include numbers from both sides, only from Muslim groups. Not to mention that he claims that the motivation is religious as opposed to political or reactions to foreign 'interventions' for Muslims but would never attribute religion to other sides, even when shown evidence.

A good example was posted here earlier, where US forces bombed a civilian home, killing an entire family. That didn't make his list but a Taliban attack on another home did.
Or he would include numbers from Hamas yet ignore deaths by Israeli snipers who target and kill civilian protesters.

He just makes up rules to support his confirmation bias, based on his racist, Islamaphobic views.

 

[basketcase]

Yes, Phil includes countries at war but won't include numbers from both sides, only from Muslim groups. Not to mention that he claims that the motivation is religious as opposed to political or reactions to foreign 'interventions' for Muslims but would never attribute religion to other sides, even when shown evidence....

As usual you don't want to blame the people who actually choose to commit terrorism but instead blame the west for taking away the dictators.

Yes, the righties like to pretend that religious violence in countries across the world are a threat to us here and ignore things like significant Hindu violence against Muslims in places like Sri Lanka but there is no way to deny that groups like Boko Haram or ISIS are motivated by their interpretation of their religion.

 

[Frankfooter]

As usual you don't want to blame the people who actually choose to commit terrorism but instead blame the west for taking away the dictators.

Yes, the righties like to pretend that religious violence in countries across the world are a threat to us here and ignore things like significant Hindu violence against Muslims in places like Sri Lanka but there is no way to deny that groups like Boko Haram or ISIS are motivated by their interpretation of their religion.

I don't know much about Boko Haram, but ISIS was largely motivated by the US occupation of Iraq, combined with their firing of all Saddam's old guard, who largely were the initial base of ISIS.

 

[doggystyle99]

As usual you don't want to blame the people who actually choose to commit terrorism but instead blame the west for taking away the dictators.

Yes, the righties like to pretend that religious violence in countries across the world are a threat to us here and ignore things like significant Hindu violence against Muslims in places like Sri Lanka but there is no way to deny that groups like Boko Haram or ISIS are motivated by their interpretation of their religion.

I agree with you that groups like Boko Haram, ISIS or Taliban are motivated mostly by their interpretation of their religion, but Frankfooter was replying to my post above which I was questioning PhilcMcnasty's lack of logic behind how he keeps track of attacks by the Taliban in Afghanistan while they are fighting a war against another group and yet Phil is only keeping track of attacks of one side.
Which proves there is no logic behind it at all but rather his keeping track is based on his Islamophobic views and trying to just show all the attacks by one side meanwhile wifully ignoring the other sides killings.

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

I am trying to find the logic behind how you are keeping track of these attacks but your tracking is invalid.
As you are keeping track of attacks in war regions by groups who are fighting one another but yet you're only keeping track of one side of the attacks that are taken. There is absolutely no logic in that, but hey keep going you've reached the resident Islamaphobe level of Zeibetter. Congrats

Wrong! Some countries are still at war, but a lot of other countries are not.

The purpose of this thread is to show that radical Islam is a giant shitdisturber across the world when it comes to killing people. Especially killing civilians intentionally! Apologists like Frankfooter start equating collateral damage whenever a US drone misses its target with Islamists who intentionally try to kill as many civilians as they can.

If you travelled to Europe tomorrow for vacation, what would you worry about more, a US drone missing its target or an radical muslim detonating a bomb at some airport?? I think you know the answer.

The US does occassionally kill civilians unintentionally. Unfortunately there is no way round that, no matter how careful they are, or no matter how smart their bomb is, mistakes will always be made and that is unfortunate. Radical muslims however go out and try kill as many civilians as they can and that makes them a far greater threat to civilization worldwide than white supremacists or islamophobes (as this thread clearly proves so far).

The number dont lie. I know you Lefties dont like to hear the politically incorrect truth, but the truth is still the truth

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

I agree with you that groups like Boko Haram, ISIS or Taliban are motivated mostly by their interpretation of their religion, but Frankfooter was replying to my post above which I was questioning PhilcMcnasty's lack of logic behind how he keeps track of attacks by the Taliban in Afghanistan while they are fighting a war against another group and yet Phil is only keeping track of attacks of one side

Because right now Afghanistan has some sort of stable government (thanks to the US).
The Taliban (who of course are all radical muslims) are trying their best to overthrow that government so they can establish a muslim caliphate.
That makes the Taliban terrorists in all this. Its plain and simple

 

[Frankfooter]

Wrong! Some countries are still at war, but a lot of other countries are not.

The purpose of this thread is to show that radical Islam is a giant shitdisturber across the world when it comes to killing people. Especially killing civilians intentionally! Apologists like Frankfooter start equating collateral damage whenever a US drone misses its target with Islamists who intentionally try to kill as many civilians as they can.

If you travelled to Europe tomorrow for vacation, what would you worry about more, a US drone missing its target or an radical muslim detonating a bomb at some airport?? I think you know the answer.

The US does occassionally kill civilians unintentionally. Unfortunately there is no way round that, no matter how careful they are, or no matter how smart their bomb is, mistakes will always be made and that is unfortunate. Radical muslims however go out and try kill as many civilians as they can and that makes them a far greater threat to civilization worldwide than white supremacists or islamophobes (as this thread clearly proves so far).

The number dont lie. I know you Lefties dont like to hear the politically incorrect truth, but the truth is still the truth

The numbers don't lie.
About 500,000 were killed by the US and allies in the Global War on Terror.
And half of those were civilians.
https://theintercept.com/2018/11/19/civilian-casualties-us-war-on-terror/

But since they are Muslims, Phil won't count them as people.

 

[Frankfooter]

Because right now Afghanistan has some sort of stable government (thanks to the US).
The Taliban (who of course are all radical muslims) are trying their best to overthrow that government so they can establish a muslim caliphate.
That makes the Taliban terrorists in all this. Its plain and simple

The US puppet government has not run Afghanistan well, its corrupt and inept and also only runs Kabul, not the full country.

The US is now in discussions with the Taliban, who they overthrew, for peace talks. Not included in these talks are the US puppet government.
Wonder why?

From their point of view, its a foreign invasion they are fighting, not a religious war.

Since the Taliban was overthrown by the US-led military intervention in 2001, the group maintains that the country has been occupied by foreign forces.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/05/taliban-talks-peace-afghanistan-190510062940394.html

What it looks like is that the US will retreat from the country and hand it back to the Taliban, not the puppet government.

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

Nobody takes a certain poster here seriously. His name starts with an F

 

[basketcase]

I agree with you that groups like Boko Haram, ISIS or Taliban are motivated mostly by their interpretation of their religion, but Frankfooter was replying to my post above which I was questioning PhilcMcnasty's lack of logic behind how he keeps track of attacks by the Taliban in Afghanistan while they are fighting a war against another group and yet Phil is only keeping track of attacks of one side.
Which proves there is no logic behind it at all but rather his keeping track is based on his Islamophobic views and trying to just show all the attacks by one side meanwhile wifully ignoring the other sides killings.

The challenge is to identify what the targets of the attacks were and whether civilian casualties are the goal or an accident. I would consider Taliban attacks on an army base to be a military act but bombings in markets or around polling stations are terrorism. I have seen little evidence that shows the US is intentionally targeting Afghan civilians.

But yes, Phil and others here are clearly motivated by their view negative of non-white foreigners and Muslims in particular.

 

[basketcase]

I don't know much about Boko Haram, but ISIS was largely motivated by the US occupation of Iraq, combined with their firing of all Saddam's old guard, who largely were the initial base of ISIS.

So why was ISIS so busy attacking Christians, Shia, and other religious groups and why do you refuse to hold them accountable for their choices?

 

[basketcase]

...

The purpose of this thread is to show that radical Islam is a giant shitdisturber across the world when it comes to killing people. ...

Except your talking points often ignore that it's an extreme fringe, not the majority.

 

[Frankfooter]

Nobody takes a certain poster here seriously. His name starts with an F

Sure Phil.
I notice you're too afraid to answer to any of my points anymore, since you've been shown wrong so often here.
Go ahead and try to dispute the facts.