You guys are just claiming that molten metal leaking out the building is aluminum or glass, something that doesn't look anything like molten iron. Aluminum doesn't glow a bright orange color when its completely smelted
Wrong, yes molten aluminum and/or glass can absolutely look bright orange at temperatures below the known fire temperatures in the WTC. We have provided 3 separate independent sources of information and a simple google image search of "smelted aluminium" will prove this as fact.
whats to stop it from running down once it can start flowing at its melting point?
This was already reasonably explained in the video URL I provided.
Hundreds of eye witness and victom reports of secondary explosions all throughout the elevator shafts that have no connection to the upper floors where the fire was.
How do "eyewitnesses" on the ground
see through the structure of the building to witness "secondary explosions all throughout the elevator shaft" <-- do they have x-ray vision?
How do these same "witnesses" know precisely where the sound came within the building? These people were surrounded by 100s of sources of loud noise, they were
at least 4 blocks from the building (police created a 4 block zone within an hour of the attack) and the human ear cannot easily locate a unique source of noise within a few feet from 1000s of feet away and inside a structure.
Nobody has debunked the thermite reports.
There are 100s of website debunking this theory.
Ironically where the support columns are.
Ummm dah. What makes the WTC so unique is that there are no support columns throughout the floors. Just the elevator core and outside columns. If you are trying to say that the elevator shaft below the fire floors was destroyed using explosives, there is no way that the eyewitnesses could know that as the outside of the building blocked their view. Most controlled demolition conspiracy theories claim the thermite was used on the outside columns and the joints between the floor structure and the core and outside columns.
The molten metal after the collapse was keeping its heat rather than cooling when the fires were out and the "massive energy" has stopped in the form of a pile of rubble. In 24-48 hours the metal should have cooled but it remaind intensely hot for weeks, only a chemical reaction can create and maintain its heat until the process is complete.
UGH. You really need to research better. Two of the main advantages of thermite is it burns very hot and fast. Thermite itself does not continue to generate a chemical reaction and therefore heat once it's done. In your video, both demos lasted less than 10 seconds with no glowing afterwards. So your theory is wrong. Any continued heat in the rubble would be as a result of the fires and collapse itself as has already been proven in this thread.
a thermite reaction is irreversable it cant be cooled with water even if it was submerged.
Depending on how it was designed to burn, the thermite reaction would last from seconds to less than a minute - as supported by YOUR video. Your argument is nonsense.
This guy nailed it with these demonstrations while exparimenting the effectiveness of thermite used for controlled demolition....I take it some ppl here dont know what a "demonstration" is but just watch anyways.
Nice video, but zero proof that's what actually happened in the WTC.
Now you please explain to us:
1) How the bad-guys got the 100+ tons of thermite into the building, installed it in 100s and 100s of locations needed, wired it, repaired all evidence of the installation without anyone seeing
2) Managed to keep the 100s of people involved quiet for 16 years
3) Convince 1000+ experts to buy into their fake story
4) Why? Why did they do it?? What did they gain??? Insurance money? A war? Why?
5) How do you convince 100s of people to murder 1000s of fellow Americans with no real gain to America?
6) The logistics of wiring the building was immense! The resultant need to fly the planes into a very specific floor almost impossible. The chance of the explosive wiring not being damaged almost impossible. The chance of unexploded thermite being found was high. C'mon, get real!
7) YOUR video clearly shows that all that is required for the thermite to melt a 1 inch wide slot into each structural location. That would generate ..... 5? ounces of liquid metal each? Multiple that by 200 locations. I'm guessing of course, but lets say is was 10X more of each. That's very little molten metal compared to what poured out of the building and was found in the rubble.
