Re: Justice Minister

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0
The comments of the justice minister suggest that the Harper government within the next year will bring in laws which will be toxic to the sex trade without fear of losing any votes at the poll. Likely those who are working in the sex trade do not vote Conservative or may not vote period.
You may be correct, but I don't hear the Minister of Justice having suggested that. True Blue customers - you know the one's that at whom potshots are often taken on TERB, presumably also have the intelligence to write letters to those they know which basically address issues in the third person. Likewise thanks to the Australian Ballot they are even able to vote their conscience without anyone knowing.
 

ICEman72

Member
Apr 4, 2011
753
0
18
Downtowner
We often expect others to conduct themselves, or react much like we do...The world would be a better place if half of society conducted themselves like I do.

Is it then fair to say that although you personally have taken great strides to ensure you aren't booking someone underaged, that even though you do this, that everyone else does too? Absolutely not. I am not delusional enough to think such a thing. There for it isn't a problem or does not occur? The problem is widespread and rampant. You asked a question and I answered based on my experiences. While I cannot make the problem go away, I can personally take precautions to ensure I do not perpetuate the selling of underaged pimped girls.

If your experiences then lead you to believe a majority of gentlemen conduct themselves like you do, you wouldn't necessarily be aware of anything outside of that, nor would they. Even though I conduct myself in the fashion I stated, I am educated enough and not naive to believe anyone conducts themselves as I do and I am well aware of the problem of human trafficking and the effects on society.

If you believe underaged prostitution only exists on sub par advertising outlets, as you've suggested- you truly are mistaken. Oh I know. I referenced backpages and terb because those sites are familiar to me. I am positive high end child prostitution sites exist however I have no interest in partaking in said activity and will never seek it out. This is not to suggest others will do as I do. I am well aware of the perversions sought by certain elements of society.

I would then also state, your awareness of the actual problem is limited based on your experience... Wouldn't you? While I agree my awareness may be limited I was not born last night. I may look shiny but I am not new. This problem will not go away with any change in legislation. It is akin to the war on drugs and I'm not sure it can be won which is unfortunate because I see human trafficking and pimping to be far worse than drugs. Any drugs...except maybe for that crazy krokodil shit that started in Russia and is now in North America. How does society stop this? I don't know. I'm afraid I am not qualified to say. Perhaps education is key. Maybe this way people will recognize the signs and notify the authorities when necessary.

Certainly does not mean there isn't a huge problem, or that underaged prostitution isn't a thriving unfortunate part of the sex trade, often not clearly understood by even those who participate responsibly in the sex trade.
I agree with you 100% and support your attempt at having discussion and debate over the topic. This is one way to educate and encourage participants to act responsibly however this will not impact those individuals who have the base urges to see younger and younger girls/boys whatever.
 

lomotil

Well-known member
Mar 14, 2004
6,497
1,355
113
Oblivion
I have seen ~50 providers... walking into spas or indies. Almost all Asian. I have definitely never seen any underage girls, I prefer women over 30. As for pimping, who knows but I doubt it. If I was seeing tatted up chicks out of motels on the 427 then maybe. When I started I was paranoid that I was going to be seeing trafficked, desperate women. The reality was pretty surprising. I've met homely, overweight, older women who spoke little English and had no relevant-to-Canada education yet were finishing the payment on their third rental property while paying their kids' private school tuitions. These are women who would have trouble working the register at Timmy's doing better than most Canadian born citizens.
There are a few thousand woman, many Asian as you mentioned in the sex trade in the GTA, Vancouver, some in Montreal increasingly in Calgary and Edmonton. The public face of prostitution in Canada largely ignores these women. In the GTA, it is unlikely to find Asian street walkers, but likely more than half of the prostitutes in Toronto are Asian involved in holistic, massage, incalls and agencies. The spotlight is not on these women, but on street walkers like the ones who were killed by Picton in Vancouver or in York Region or Calgary, the drive to go after black pimps controlling Caucasian females and the Conservative government will enact laws primarily addressing those groups. No one can argue that these older Asian females are being pimped.
 

Vixens

New member
Dec 26, 2006
2,698
0
0
www.torontovixens.com
Here are a few I found:

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/_/dict.aspx?rd=1&word=pimp

http://www.change.org/petitions/mer...efinition-of-pimp-to-a-realistic-definition-2
^ as stated, the definition of a "pimp" needs to be altered, equally obvious in links we both found.


So I then looked up "procuring"
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procuring_(prostitution)

"Procuring or pandering popularly known as pimping, is the facilitation or provision of a prostitute in the arrangement of a sex act with a customer.

[1] Examples of procuring include:

-trafficking a prostitute into a country for the purpose of soliciting sex
-operating a prostitution business
-transporting a prostitute to the location of their arrangement
-deriving financial gain from the prostitution of another"


"A procurer, colloquially called a pimp (if male) or a madam (if female), is an agent for prostitutes who collects part of their earnings."

Perhaps "procuring" or "procurer" better defines a broad scope of what a pimp or pimping could be considered.

Procurer is indeed a better word although the definition you posted still has negative connotations.

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/procurer

This one is better but still wrong. I don't find girls for clients. I find clients for girls.

I value your opinion, have enjoyed some of your posts and wouldn't mind discussing these issues with you but if I'm being 100% honest I find your approach a bit passive aggressive. There is good and bad in this business but painting everyone with the same brush perpetuates the stereotypes. Not every agency owner is a pimp, not every client is a trick and not every escort is a hooker.

This industry should be coming together as a whole to try to incite real and effective change, not trying to trip each other up. Unfortunately, as long as we remain focused on our own little sections of it nothing will change.

Steph
 

staggerspool

Member
Mar 7, 2004
708
0
16
The sex industry is demonic in most people's minds. Talk to 25 people and 24 will wrongly think it is a sleazy cesspool that needs eradication. There is a PR problem with this industry that Teri Bedford, Valerie Scott and a bunch of creepy looking lawyers can't fix by themselves. Easy votes for the real sleazes now in power.
Actually, you're wrong.

"A review of seven national public opinion polls conducted between 1984 and 2011 reveals that, contrary to the CLF and the prime minister's claims, since 2005 a small majority of Canadians favour some form of decriminalization of consensual adult prostitution. The surveys reveal marked gender differences in attitudes to prostitution law reform, with men being more likely to favour decriminalization than women. Three Angus Reid surveys (2009, 2010, 2011) suggest that there is little support for the "Nordic model" of demand-side prohibition."

From https://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/canadian_journal_of_criminology_and_criminal_justice/v054/54.2.lowman.html
 

pocahottie

New member
Jan 19, 2011
206
0
0
Procurer is indeed a better word although the definition you posted still has negative connotations.

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/procurer

This one is better but still wrong. I don't find girls for clients. I find clients for girls.

I value your opinion, have enjoyed some of your posts and wouldn't mind discussing these issues with you but if I'm being 100% honest I find your approach a bit passive aggressive. There is good and bad in this business but painting everyone with the same brush perpetuates the stereotypes. Not every agency owner is a pimp, not every client is a trick and not every escort is a hooker.

This industry should be coming together as a whole to try to incite real and effective change, not trying to trip each other up. Unfortunately, as long as we remain focused on our own little sections of it nothing will change.

Steph
Steph, I effectively start a conversation in an attempt to not only include, but welcome opinions, input or any form of discussion to bring awareness to ALL issues while also trying to challenge those who do, to offer insight in aspects not "discussed".

Nowhere have I stated my personal opinion.


If you then want to tell me, that even if you do procure and have a moral compass when doing so, that I am not aware of both the bad and the good, then you are making assumptions or putting words into my mouth. I do know that, but Steph, please be realistic in also understanding you are a rarity and do NOT represent the majority of "agencies".

I will also state Steph, having been around for some time- you and I are both aware that organized crime is very much involved in the industry, both in the higher tiered agency aspect, as well as street level thug "pimps".

Where you feel I am passive- aggressive, I am simply showing all aspects, some obvious, some not.

At the very least... It makes people think.

I can also reserve my personal opinion, which won't change- while still being openminded enough to take your opinion, and viewpoints into account and respect what you do think, even if I believe differently than you do.

So, I'd love to talk- in fact I was going to call... But wasn't sure if that would be welcomed even if we don't agree on "everything".
 

lomotil

Well-known member
Mar 14, 2004
6,497
1,355
113
Oblivion
These older Asian sex workers are likely Canadian citizens already and did not come to Canada to be sex workers originally as opposed to the sex tourists coming on working holiday or student visas who stay for a year work as escorts and then leave. The SCC ruling and the coming interests of the Harper Government in addressing prostitution do not pertain to the above.
 

Vixens

New member
Dec 26, 2006
2,698
0
0
www.torontovixens.com
Steph, I effectively start a conversation in an attempt to not only include, but welcome opinions, input or any form of discussion to bring awareness to ALL issues while also trying to challenge those who do, to offer insight in aspects not "discussed".

Nowhere have I stated my personal opinion.


If you then want to tell me, that even if you do procure and have a moral compass when doing so, that I am not aware of both the bad and the good, then you are making assumptions or putting words into my mouth. I do know that, but Steph, please be realistic in also understanding you are a rarity and do NOT represent the majority of "agencies".

I will also state Steph, having been around for some time- you and I are both aware that organized crime is very much involved in the industry, both in the higher tiered agency aspect, as well as street level thug "pimps".

Where you feel I am passive- aggressive, I am simply showing all aspects, some obvious, some not.

At the very least... It makes people think.

I can also reserve my personal opinion, which won't change- while still being openminded enough to take your opinion, and viewpoints into account and respect what you do think, even if I believe differently than you do.

So, I'd love to talk- in fact I was going to call... But wasn't sure if that would be welcomed even if we don't agree on "everything".

We are saying the same things from different perspectives. In fact I completely agree on a lot of your points. Most of what is "wrong" with this industry isn't obvious to most....even those who fancy themselves "insiders".
I don't believe I'm a rarity though. There are a lot of good people, most of those just aren't as opinionated and vocal as I am. Lol.
Call anytime it would be good to chat :).

Steph
 

pocahottie

New member
Jan 19, 2011
206
0
0
I agree with you 100% and support your attempt at having discussion and debate over the topic. This is one way to educate and encourage participants to act responsibly however this will not impact those individuals who have the base urges to see younger and younger girls/boys whatever.
If there's one thing that gets my panties in a bunch, if I wore them... is not being able to reply, with all of your quote :D

But you my friend, nailed it... although I will correct one small thing;

While starting the conversation and making people "aware" when paired with "action" it does make a difference.

If each one of us, were responsible and accountable and took a stand- there would be an impact.

The problem is: it usually isn't until it affects them directly... Which is sometimes too late.

So while I believe "this" conversation won't divert sick fucks who exploit children, if us "responsible" people worked together to make sure their was accountability, to protect children who may not be our own; under the premise IT could be, and everyone did their part... it would make a difference.

Perhaps the nordic model has it pit falls, maybe it would enable protecting the "vulnerable" or maybe there's a solution outside that, like raising the legal age, altering the consequences if anyone obtains the services of a minor, or maybe working along those direct lines.

At this moment, I don't have all the answers. But if all of this makes one person think, or has the audience to act as a 'voice' then it served a well intended purpose.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,508
1,375
113
One has to wonder about the organization that pushed this on the agenda during a conservative govt. I think they are morons and did their membership a huge disservice. There is no question we will go with the Nordic model. I would wager a fair sum of money on it. Anyone who is in this business better start making plans to find a new career path. I will probably spend much less time in Canada. This country is really turning into a conservative shithole.
 
Last edited:

pocahottie

New member
Jan 19, 2011
206
0
0
One has to wonder about the organization that pushed this on the agenda during a conservative govt. I think they are morons and did their membership a huge disservice. There is no question we will go with the Nordic model. I would wager a fair sum of money on it. Anyone who is in this business better start making plans to find a new career path. I will probably spend much less time in Canada. This country is really turning into a conservative shithole.
I think your wording of "pushed" is interesting.

Irregardless of personal agendas, the issues surrounding prostitution have been swept under the carpet for a very long time. In fact, suppressing this has made it even more to have to deal with when 'pushed' to because of inaction.

The government having to "address" this and the discord in trying to do so, leaves many with the option at the "poles" and also taking an active part in being an advocate for your beliefs.
 
Toronto Escorts