Putin's Russia & Ukraine updates

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,408
1,703
113
Inch by inch is the saying no? LOL
Not only that, but, in the military at least, strategy is your theoretical, overarching plan while tactics are the incremental steps taken to achieve your strategic goal. So a strategic breach would be a purely theoretical one until a tactical breach realizes it. So either this was a surprise breach that the strategy never planned for, which is amazing, or the strategic breach happened months ago at the planning table. If the former, I guess they're waiting for the battle planners to plot the current tactical breach onto the map and implement the new development into their strategy. If the letter, I'm not sure what they're waiting for.
 

NotADcotor

His most imperial galactic atheistic majesty.
Mar 8, 2017
7,205
4,859
113
Are the Ukes being invaded by South Africa and Vietnam?
There are also no plans for Ukraine to take Moscow so that comment is about as valid as yours. Except wooosh there went the point over you head.
You are making up bullshit poutine talking points so I also did... to mock.
 

NotADcotor

His most imperial galactic atheistic majesty.
Mar 8, 2017
7,205
4,859
113
Difference between striking and reaching. It should be clear from the thread when I mentioned I'd be happy if they reached the Azov or Tormak.
 

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
42,117
8,913
113
Pootin has failed miserably in taking out western Ukraine's coastal big guns, as such an invasion of Odesa is impossible.

This sums up what Pootin has achieved on the Black Sea.

 

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
42,117
8,913
113
Pootin is willing to absorb the casualties until his snuggle poo is back in power in 2025.

 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
25,609
3,604
113
Pootin has failed miserably in taking out western Ukraine's coastal big guns, as such an invasion of Odesa is impossible.

This sums up what Pootin has achieved on the Black Sea.

Why would Russia attack Odessa from the sea? Its absurd to launch a amphibious attack. They can build up the force in Transnistria and also attack from the east. any talk of an amphibious attack is stupid talk. They would need HUNDREDS of landing ships, which they have never had.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
25,609
3,604
113
Difference between striking and reaching. It should be clear from the thread when I mentioned I'd be happy if they reached the Azov or Tormak.

this is the highly propagandized BBC view. And even they admit the first line has not been breached. And FYI the lines are designed to be breached. And when you breach line 1, there are minefields, artillery, air power and hell will be brought down upon that breach. So yeah. Not likely to happen and its taken them 3.5m of brutal grinding war just for selfies at the dragons teeth. 🐷 to the slaughter.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: squeezer
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts