Hi Jessica,
It's impossible to prove how many men are currently / or were blackmailed because that's how blackmail works. They are forced to keep quiet 'or else'.
I see that you are very much in favour of prescreening many details about your clients before meeting them to ensure compatibility. I do agree that your safety is very important, and you are free to operate whichever way works best for you.
I also noticed that you require to see reviews about you before they are posted. One of your main reasons is listed as to ensure you don't get too busy "with the increased volume they create in a time when I simply can not handle the amount"
Ironically, I cannot find a negative review about you here either. All positive.
I am sure there are plenty of SPs who are raped and robbed that are not reported in the stats I would find too so I am sure both of our "lack of numbers" would balance each other out but we both know the numbers of voilence against women in this industry is higher then the amount of men being blackmailed.
All my clients have repeated too or at the very least have wanted too but other reasons have not allowed it yet. Screening works very well and not just for safety as I have already admitted. Thank you for proving my point.
As you can see, I am not bullshitting either. Since my signature clearly shows that I don't want increased volume. I am not even accepting new clients at the moment. I don't have enough time. I only recently allowed a couple of reviews when the couple of gentlemen who wrote them, asked to do so. Before I had a NRP. Again due to volume. However, I would not have the power to stop a negative review if someone decided to write one. No one ever has because no one has been unhappy. Not because I am the perfect escort but because I ..... you got it - screen.
I also have no interested in my time or your money being wasted. I don't need your money or any "escorting" money. It pads my retirement, not pay my bills. I do this because it is a great form of paid dating. So I have no problem telling inquiring gentlemen that I am probably not what they are looking for and I will be happy to refer someone else if I can. That includes other SPs in my area with similar body type, age, incall, and with less screening for guys like you who choose not to be screened.
See I have no issue with guys who don't want to be screened. My issue comes from guys acting like the sky is falling when a lady like myself chooses to screen. It seems to me that men take it as a slight or rejection against them or as some diva princess move on the part of the escort. When neither are the case. I don't take offence when a guy says he won't see me because I ask for too much info, but men seem to get their panties bunched when I say I won't see them with a text app.
Just because we advertise ourselves on the public domain does not mean are available to the public. I know that seems off but that is the reality. I am not available to all people. I am not available to women, couples, in duos or to men who use text apps. I am not available to all men.
I get that most escorts are available to more men then I am but that does not negate the fact that 90% of escorts are not available to every single guy either. Plenty screen for age minimums for example. Screening is more then just real names and numbers. Women screen how they feel works for them. It is about safety at a minimum and it is as much more as each individual escort wants it to be.
So gentlemen should respect a ladies screening and booking process. Respecting does not mean you have to give out info you don't feel comfortable giving. But it does mean that you just politely move on and not create a big stink on forums like these. We don't start threads complaining that guys don't want to be screened. This thread wasn't even about screening. It was about websites. It is the guys who bring it here, who complain, who tell us we are wrong for doing it the way we do.
Just like there is a willing-to-be screened client for every guy here who complains, there is another escort who has relaxed screening processes for every one of us who screens. So why are we wasting this thread about websites debating something that needs no debate?
You do you, I will do me and we will both be happy.
Okay so on a board like this maybe suggesting we both "do" ourselves is not right but you know what I mean. LOL
