It's a fact.
And I should stop seeing White clients immediately !!!
And you meant Serial not Cereal !!!
Please don't do that!! we aren't all racist assholes!!!!
Pondering stereotypes
- Thread starter oftenrong69
- Start date
Please don't do that!! we aren't all racist assholes!!!!
And you meant Serial not Cereal !!! [/QUOTE]
Damm auto correct!! I edited it and made changes, thanks for the edit!
[/QUOTE]Damm auto correct!! I edited it and made changes, thanks for the edit!
I know that you are just making a point here
However, if that is a stand that you are prepared to make than you are just as wrong!
I wasn't going to touch this thread with a ten foot pole - but have to point out that the stats are pointing to a key stereotype that has an even higher correlation than race or skin colour: SEX. Predominantly all of the problems were from clients/people with a penis and ballsack. So the obvious solution is to only see female customers - the stats point to this. It might be a growing market too.
Oh, and an easy way to spot a cereal rapist is to see who gets a stiffie when you pull out a box of Cheerios.
Oh, and an easy way to spot a cereal rapist is to see who gets a stiffie when you pull out a box of Cheerios.
It's a myth an urban legend thanks for the media:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/wicked-deeds/201412/serial-killer-myth-6-they-are-all-white
Here is the serial killers statistics by Radford University by race:
http://maamodt.asp.radford.edu/Serial Killer Information Center/Serial Killer Statistics.pdf
While in 1900 in US the all of the serial killers 73% was white , and 25% was black, then in 2010 the 60% of the serial killers was black and only 30% was white. It's weird because the white population is 6 times higher than the black population in 2010. So do the math where is the bigger risk.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demography_of_the_United_States
@Iris the serial killer stuff is pretty pointless (and harmless to you)
Most white serial killers (who are the vast majority) kill white people
Most black serial killers kill black people
Equality has not yet penetrated the serial killer circles (although sometimes a racist serial killer will hunt outside his own race)
But black serial killers are in general about as common as female serial killers
Most white serial killers (who are the vast majority) kill white people
Most black serial killers kill black people
Equality has not yet penetrated the serial killer circles (although sometimes a racist serial killer will hunt outside his own race)
But black serial killers are in general about as common as female serial killers
so if we conclude "black men have big dicks, thus a burden to most women", period! This thread can have a happy ending
LOL....You didn't get it, as you didn't get anything on this board. A troll try to test me? Seriously?
It's kind of sad. It's sad you read too much into my comments. It's sad you make what is arguably an offensive point by using a single story about some guy as justification. It's sad you will call me a troll because I pointed out the error of said point. And test you - WTF are you talking about?
Any lady can choose not to see clients of any type - that is her choice. Now, I didn't ask you to explain yourself cause frankly your reasons make no difference. But you decided to lay it all out there by writing a bunch of statements that Mocha found somewhat offensive (even I kind of thought it wasn't the wisest writing either).
Bottom line, all you needed to say (note I said needed, not have to because again, nobody asked and nobody "forced" you), was that you've had some bad experiences. That's it - even I wrote that in my first response as a standard reason. Going off about it and then trying to blame me or insult me as a way to backpedal is not getting you anywhere.
I agree with your last part there. It was like she was pissed. Perhaps it was because I made a comment. Or perhaps she didn't like it being pointed out that her logic was messed and a little racist.
I know that you are just making a point here
However, if that is a stand that you are prepared to make than you are just as wrong!
Dude - she's clearly joking. It's called sarcasm/satire. She's using other's people fuzzy logic to make a point. Based on similar logic, I shouldn't see white ladies, Asian ladies, or Middle Eastern ladies because at one time or another, I saw one that had BO or an odour down below. But I chalk up those issues to the individual, not each/every member of their race.
You right Sempel. Not everyone are the same but I had bad experiences too. If I want to play russian roulette I won't do it for 250 CAD.
Unfortunately if I don't feel safe or afraid from a client, I just don't take them and I have every right to do it. I kicked out many guys from other race from my place in the past. Otherwise trust me, black guys are not a big spender in this business. ( Except a few but I leave them for other girls )
If I don't want to sex with black guys why they, or you, or the media try to push me?? Why?? Spend their hard earning money for someone who likes and takes black clients.
I have 3 strong reason :
1. As an international ex dancer and SP, I had really bad experiences in the past. France and Canada and Spain too.
2. I hate when the media suggest it's so cool, as a white blond girl, I must f..k with black guys with big dicks( what is a totally false info. They
not bigger just darker) I don't like if the media push me at any direction. I'm an adult and I can make my own decisions.
3. 85% of my regular clientele are usually older than 40-50 years old. Asians, whites, indians, middle easterns.
Believe it or not, those guys don't like to share me with black clients. You can't believe how happy they are because no ebonies in my
bedroom and I got that question through text many times in the past.
They don't want daty or any activity if they know there were a black sausages half hour before their session.
It's funny...... because it's true.
If I take black guys ( what I simply won't because it's my body and my choice) I will lose half of my regular clients.
Case closed!
I don't think you would lose clients if you saw black guys. Johns accept that this is a business for SPs and we assume that SPs see all kinds of men so long as they have the money. Likewise, if a john is happy with you not seeing black guys, he would probably be even happier if you stopped seeing other ethnicities too. It makes no difference to us who you see as long as they're clean, so that you stay clean.
Human beings have a natural stereotyping mechanism built-in that actually does a lot of good for us. In fact, stereotyping is how we learn to recognize the world around us, after sensing it. One way this helps us is when we're young we begin to recognize dangers. Metal glowing red burns you, now you have a stereotype. Sharp items cut you, now you have a stereotype. Fast objects can seriously hurt you, now you have a stereotype. Repeated instances of these reinforce the stereotype.
Racial stereotypes work more or less the same way. We hear something, see something, or read something about someone who is a specific race...that gets logged in our brains. Repeated instances reinforce it. Positive and negative stereotypes can duke it out for precedence.
Black gents unfortunately have a prevalent stereotype of pimping or being violent. This is based at least partially in reality. I haven't yet actually encountered a non-black pimp (that I know of), so the stereotype of a pimp to me IS black. Logic dictates to me that not all black people are pimps or violent, so I can somewhat dismiss the stereotype. But I can't eliminate it.
Same way we stereotype men as aggressive drivers. Not all men are aggressive drivers. Not all women are timid drivers. All the same, men, as a whole, pay more for insurance. Insurance companies act on the stereotype. It's the exact same thing with SPs who don't see black gents. They're acting on a stereotype that has statistical backing, but not universal truth.
Racial stereotypes work more or less the same way. We hear something, see something, or read something about someone who is a specific race...that gets logged in our brains. Repeated instances reinforce it. Positive and negative stereotypes can duke it out for precedence.
Black gents unfortunately have a prevalent stereotype of pimping or being violent. This is based at least partially in reality. I haven't yet actually encountered a non-black pimp (that I know of), so the stereotype of a pimp to me IS black. Logic dictates to me that not all black people are pimps or violent, so I can somewhat dismiss the stereotype. But I can't eliminate it.
Same way we stereotype men as aggressive drivers. Not all men are aggressive drivers. Not all women are timid drivers. All the same, men, as a whole, pay more for insurance. Insurance companies act on the stereotype. It's the exact same thing with SPs who don't see black gents. They're acting on a stereotype that has statistical backing, but not universal truth.
Yes... stereotypes live or die on repeated exposure. Stereotypes exist and are based on kernels of truth.
Actually this is very poorly written.
You stereotype people or groups of people. So the examples listed (hot metal, sharp items, fast objects) are not stereotypes. Plus suppose it was used to define objects, since hot metal DOES burn, it still would be incorrect usage.
Stereotypes do not need to have a kernel of truth to them. Mass genocide has taken place based on racial stereotypes (WW2, Rwanda, even slavery).
Insurance companies don't stereotype. They use statistics and actuarial science to come up with the probability of payout and then charge accordingly. Unfortunately since statistically more men get into accidents, we are charged more.
YUP!
That's very interesting. I wonder what the precise definition is for "serial killer". For example, do they classify a black gangbanger who kills 3 rival gangbangers are a serial killer?
Differences between a serial killer and hitman/assassin
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blo...professional-assassins-are-not-serial-killers
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blo...professional-assassins-are-not-serial-killers
Based on the article, none of the types fit. I would not have labeled the Las Vegas shooter a serial killer nor a person that kills their whole family. Clearly it's not the number of murders that puts you into the category. Paul Bernardo only killed two girls (that we know of) but he's considered a serial killer.
Similar threads
