Toronto Escorts

Poll: Who gets your vote

If a federal election were held tomorrow who would get your vote

  • Pierre Pollievre's Conservative Party

    Votes: 41 67.2%
  • Justin Trudeau's Liberal Party

    Votes: 13 21.3%
  • Jagmeet Singh's New Democratic Party

    Votes: 5 8.2%
  • Elizabeth May's Green Party

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Maxime Bernier's People's Party

    Votes: 2 3.3%

  • Total voters
    61
  • Poll closed .

DesRicardo

Well-known member
Dec 2, 2022
1,013
740
113
A lot longer than 8 yrs ago.

Just reading this thread tells you what is wrong with politics. People are so deep into their allegiance that they can't even see clearly the overall portrait of the situation and takes no accountability for their parties bad actions. I am neither a liberal or a cons, but imagine if the cons economic abilities would meet the liberal people oriented ideology. Something could probably work here.

However if I would have to choose between the extreme religious right or the corrupted left. I would go for the left. What the extreme right implies nuls everything they might have that is good.
First off, You basically said you'd vote for the Devil over God.

Secondly, I think this thread does illustrate what's wrong with politics, but not for the reason you pointed out. I've brought tons of fact based arguments to the Liberal supporters on this site, but they continue to deny and troll. What can you say to someone who boldly tells you 1mil immigrants in 9 months is ok? They only do it because They don't want to admit they're wrong.

That's what it really breaks down to. Liberals don't like what's going on, but just don't want to admit they are wrong. It's childish, ignorant and stubborn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JuanGoodman

Kautilya

It Doesn't Matter What You Think!
May 12, 2023
8,430
11,675
113
which turns out to be a minority on this site

3 to 1 to be more specific :ROFLMAO:

yet they are loud, consistent and obnoxious

to make themselves look like they are a majority
May be they are silent because there is no point talking the righties. By the way I am wondering. What will you guys say if the Libs win in 2025, but Trudeau leaves? I dont think Freeland will take his spot as she has too much "Trudeau Stink" on her. What if it is someone else?
 
Last edited:

Josephine

Making your life special
Supporting Member
Nov 6, 2023
218
407
63
Etobicoke
www.josephinegreycanada.com
First off, You basically said you'd vote for the Devil over God.

Secondly, I think this thread does illustrate what's wrong with politics, but not for the reason you pointed out. I've brought tons of fact based arguments to the Liberal supporters on this site, but they continue to deny and troll. What can you say to someone who boldly tells you 1mil immigrants in 9 months is ok? They only do it because They don't want to admit they're wrong.

That's what it really breaks down to. Liberals don't like what's going on, but just don't want to admit they are wrong. It's childish, ignorant and stubborn.
The devil over God lol. That's cute.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kautilya

NotADcotor

His most imperial galactic atheistic majesty.
Mar 8, 2017
6,041
4,038
113
My vote is no vote. Charles in Charge, absolute monarchy, strange women in ponds giving out swords for the win.

If I am burdened with the vote, Cthulhu is the way to go, why settle for the lesser evil. If I must vote human, Zombie Taft, fat guys represent yo.


May be they are silent because there is no point talking to the righties. By the way I am wondering. What will you guys say if the Libs win in 2025, but Trudeau leaves? I dont think Freeland will take his spot as she has too much "Trudeau Stink" on her. What if it is someone else?
Mark Carney might be a bit of all right in the Paul Martin mold.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kautilya

NotADcotor

His most imperial galactic atheistic majesty.
Mar 8, 2017
6,041
4,038
113
The devil over God lol. That's cute.
If you take the bible seriously, the devil is the one who introduced us to knowledge and the path from ignorence.
It isn't the devil who ordered mass exterminations
It isn't the devil who will torture you in the most horrific manner [not as bad as a Justin Beiber concert but still pretty bad] if you don't love him like some psycho ex bf/gf
It isn't the devil who put one of his followers through utter misery just to win a bet
It isn't the devil who ordered his followers to kill people for all sorts of minor reasons from working on Sunday or doing gay buttsex.
It isn't the devil that condoned slavery.

Thankfully I don't take the bible seriously, I mean God has done some good work, songs like Iron Man, Crazy Train, Paranoid, very enjoyable, where as the devil, fuck Justin Beiber is all I have to say.
 

Josephine

Making your life special
Supporting Member
Nov 6, 2023
218
407
63
Etobicoke
www.josephinegreycanada.com
If you take the bible seriously, the devil is the one who introduced us to knowledge and the path from ignorence.
It isn't the devil who ordered mass exterminations
It isn't the devil who will torture you in the most horrific manner [not as bad as a Justin Beiber concert but still pretty bad] if you don't love him like some psycho ex bf/gf
It isn't the devil who put one of his followers through utter misery just to win a bet
It isn't the devil who ordered his followers to kill people for all sorts of minor reasons from working on Sunday or doing gay buttsex.
It isn't the devil that condoned slavery.

Thankfully I don't take the bible seriously, I mean God has done some good work, songs like Iron Man, Crazy Train, Paranoid, very enjoyable, where as the devil, fuck Justin Beiber is all I have to say.
Exactly. It all depend on how you look at things
 

Kautilya

It Doesn't Matter What You Think!
May 12, 2023
8,430
11,675
113
Mark Carney might be a bit of all right in the Paul Martin mold.
I was also going to suggest him but held back to see what others may say.
 

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
11,899
3,826
113
Go back and read this thread and then every other immigration thread and see how many talk about the need for lowered immigration because "white replacement", "immigrants are uncivilized" and so on. Oh and also the Israel threads, where they call Muslims savages and what not. Not Hamas. But Muslims.
You're reaching....I've been on the Israel thread from the start....never seen one guy said about muslims...you keep playing the race card even when there's no need for one....you keep crying for shitwolf...
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Kautilya

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,609
5,756
113
What's behind Canada's housing crisis? Decades of policy failures, says former deputy PM

Canada’s housing crunch is the result of decades of poor policy stemming from the federal government leaving the issue to the provinces in the 1980s, according to one former deputy prime minister.

Former deputy prime minister Sheila Copps said in an interview with BNN Bloomberg(opens in a new tab) that when Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) was involved in building housing, there was a significant amount of national investment in housing as well as housing policy and strategy.

“The decision that was made back in 1987 to get out of housing at the federal level has resulted in 30 years of underbuilt housing, and also 30 years of not really analyzing good public policy on housing,” Copps said. “I think that's a big issue.”

POLICY SHIFTS
According to Copps, who served as a Liberal deputy prime minister in the 1990s, housing policy in the 1970s saw the national government more directly involved in building housing, including the development of seniors and Indigenous housing.

This changed in the 1980s when provincial governments took over housing policy, Copps said.

While some provincial governments, like Quebec, decided to allocate funding to social housing, Copps said many others have not.

“When the provincial governments took over the money (intended for housing), a lot of them didn't actually spend it on housing,” she said.

From that period on, she said the federal government was not involved in housing until 2017 when the Liberal government led by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau decided to “insert itself back into the housing game.” Copps said this move marked the beginning of a collaboration that will take time to address the issues of shortage and affordability currently plaguing Canadian cities.

“Now five years later, we're looking at a problem that has been percolating since we signed off on housing back in 1987,” Copps said.

“Sometimes a national government needs to be at the table to fix problems and leaving it up to 10 provinces and three territories is not always the right way to go.”

ENCOURAGING MIGRATION
In addition to building homes to increase supply, Copps said the federal housing strategy should also entail ways to incentivize migration out of Canada’s most densely populated areas.

“The other thing we need to look at is what the housing prices are in rural and remote communities versus urban areas and how we can encourage people to move around. We learned during the pandemic that everybody doesn't have to live in downtown Toronto,” she said.

“There's lots of opportunities to make people think about migrating elsewhere and getting maybe extra points for a registered homeownership investment plan. These things should be built into the thinking and to have that you really need to have a national government that is not just looking at building housing.”

 
  • Like
Reactions: Kautilya

DesRicardo

Well-known member
Dec 2, 2022
1,013
740
113
which turns out to be a minority on this site

3 to 1 to be more specific :ROFLMAO:

yet they are loud, consistent and obnoxious

to make themselves look like they are a majority
They make so much noise and diversion as possible to avoid admitting they were wrong.

You have to look at the bigger picture. We haven't seen Progressives policies get this far in a long time and it's blown up in their face.

They learned a lesson: It's either you deal with reality or reality will deal with you.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
82,229
18,371
113
They make so much noise and diversion as possible to avoid admitting they were wrong.

You have to look at the bigger picture. We haven't seen Progressives policies get this far in a long time and it's blown up in their face.

They learned a lesson: It's either you deal with reality or reality will deal with you.
All it does is confirm the claim that the terb board swings right and doesn't represent the views of Canada.

New budget today, the libs will tax the rich.
PeePee declares that's an attack on the middle class and the NDP say they should end all oil&gas subsidies and tax corporate profits too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kautilya

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
3,706
1,750
113
All it does is confirm the claim that the terb board swings right and doesn't represent the views of Canada.

New budget today, the libs will tax the rich.
PeePee declares that's an attack on the middle class and the NDP say they should end all oil&gas subsidies and tax corporate profits too.
All it does is affirm what most polls are showing. The Libs are done.
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
3,706
1,750
113
Libs + ndp = pc votes right now.
Talk to me next year.
Splitting the vote between Libs & NDP only means the PCs will win.
And considering Jagmeet has not accepted the budget yet, that can be sooner rather than later.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
82,229
18,371
113
Splitting the vote between Libs & NDP only means the PCs will win.
And considering Jagmeet has not accepted the budget yet, that can be sooner rather than later.
No, it means that the cons never get as many votes, even now when PeePee hasn't had to announce any policies.
He's still polling less than the left wing.
 

NotADcotor

His most imperial galactic atheistic majesty.
Mar 8, 2017
6,041
4,038
113
What's behind Canada's housing crisis? Decades of policy failures, says former deputy PM

Canada’s housing crunch is the result of decades of poor policy stemming from the federal government leaving the issue to the provinces in the 1980s, according to one former deputy prime minister.

Former deputy prime minister Sheila Copps said in an interview with BNN Bloomberg(opens in a new tab) that when Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) was involved in building housing, there was a significant amount of national investment in housing as well as housing policy and strategy.

“The decision that was made back in 1987 to get out of housing at the federal level has resulted in 30 years of underbuilt housing, and also 30 years of not really analyzing good public policy on housing,” Copps said. “I think that's a big issue.”

POLICY SHIFTS
According to Copps, who served as a Liberal deputy prime minister in the 1990s, housing policy in the 1970s saw the national government more directly involved in building housing, including the development of seniors and Indigenous housing.

This changed in the 1980s when provincial governments took over housing policy, Copps said.


While some provincial governments, like Quebec, decided to allocate funding to social housing, Copps said many others have not.

“When the provincial governments took over the money (intended for housing), a lot of them didn't actually spend it on housing,” she said.

From that period on, she said the federal government was not involved in housing until 2017 when the Liberal government led by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau decided to “insert itself back into the housing game.” Copps said this move marked the beginning of a collaboration that will take time to address the issues of shortage and affordability currently plaguing Canadian cities.

“Now five years later, we're looking at a problem that has been percolating since we signed off on housing back in 1987,” Copps said.

“Sometimes a national government needs to be at the table to fix problems and leaving it up to 10 provinces and three territories is not always the right way to go.”

ENCOURAGING MIGRATION
In addition to building homes to increase supply, Copps said the federal housing strategy should also entail ways to incentivize migration out of Canada’s most densely populated areas.

“The other thing we need to look at is what the housing prices are in rural and remote communities versus urban areas and how we can encourage people to move around. We learned during the pandemic that everybody doesn't have to live in downtown Toronto,” she said.

“There's lots of opportunities to make people think about migrating elsewhere and getting maybe extra points for a registered homeownership investment plan. These things should be built into the thinking and to have that you really need to have a national government that is not just looking at building housing.”

Holy fuck is she clueless and dangerously so.
 
Toronto Escorts