FOX NEWS: Tucker Carlson Gives Incredible Breakdown of #DirectedEvolutio...
Last edited:
Pfizer Exposed For Exploring "Mutating" COVID-19 Virus For New Vaccines ...
- Thread starter Addict2sex
- Start date
FOX NEWS: Tucker Carlson Gives Incredible Breakdown of #DirectedEvolutio...
No, Project Veritas Video Doesn’t Prove Pfizer Is Mutating Covid-19, Who Is Jordon Trishton Walker?
www.forbes.com
No, Project Veritas Video Doesn’t Prove Pfizer Is Mutating Covid-19, Who Is Jordon Trishton Walker?
A Project Veritas video claimed that it featured someone named “Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer Director of Research and Development - Strategic Operations and mRNA Scientific Planning.”
www.forbes.com
LOL.....This was just hilarious....''The lady doth protests too much, me thinks''
No, Project Veritas Video Doesn’t Prove Pfizer Is Mutating Covid-19, Who Is Jordon Trishton Walker?
No, Project Veritas Video Doesn’t Prove Pfizer Is Mutating Covid-19, Who Is Jordon Trishton Walker?
A Project Veritas video claimed that it featured someone named “Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer Director of Research and Development - Strategic Operations and mRNA Scientific Planning.”
Hmm..No, Project Veritas Video Doesn’t Prove Pfizer Is Mutating Covid-19, Who Is Jordon Trishton Walker?
No, Project Veritas Video Doesn’t Prove Pfizer Is Mutating Covid-19, Who Is Jordon Trishton Walker?
A Project Veritas video claimed that it featured someone named “Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer Director of Research and Development - Strategic Operations and mRNA Scientific Planning.”
"Wow - Pfizer finally puts out a press release about their gain of function research after
@Project_Veritas
exposed them *at 8 PM on a Friday night* That’s how you know they’re guilty and trying to bury the story Let the criminal investigations begin "
Wont happen. Politicians and mainstream media receive way too much money from Pharma lobbyists
Not my quote, but I agree with you.
More likely to have a congressional committee investigation where the GOP people can throw out some red meat to their base, but not actually pursue it.
Pfizer Responds After Director Says Company Is Developing Ways To Mutate COVID-19No, Project Veritas Video Doesn’t Prove Pfizer Is Mutating Covid-19, Who Is Jordon Trishton Walker?
No, Project Veritas Video Doesn’t Prove Pfizer Is Mutating Covid-19, Who Is Jordon Trishton Walker?
A Project Veritas video claimed that it featured someone named “Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer Director of Research and Development - Strategic Operations and mRNA Scientific Planning.”
SATURDAY, JAN 28, 2023 - 02:30 PM
Pfizer Responds After Director Says Company Is Developing Ways to Mutate COVID-19
www.theepochtimes.com
Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times
Pfizer late Jan. 28 responded to comments from a director at the company about exploring ways to mutate COVID-19 as a method to “preemptively develop new vaccines.”
“In the ongoing development of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, Pfizer has not conducted gain of function or directed evolution research,” Pfizer said in a lengthy written statement after days of ignoring queries from The Epoch Times and other outlets.
Pfizer did say that it has conducted research “where the original SARS-CoV-2 virus has been used to express the spike protein from new variants of concern.”
“This work is undertaken once a new variant of concern has been identified by public health authorities. This research provides a way for us to rapidly assess the ability of an existing vaccine to induce antibodies that neutralize a newly identified variant of concern. We then make this data available through peer reviewed scientific journals and use it as one of the steps to determine whether a vaccine update is required,” the company added.
Pfizer did say it has conducted experiments in a level 3 laboratory.
Pfizer said, in its work developing a treatment for COVID-19, it has “engineered” the COVID-19 virus “to enable the assessment of antiviral activity in cells.”
“In addition, in vitro resistance selection experiments are undertaken in cells incubated with SARS-CoV-2 and nirmatrelvir in our secure Biosafety level 3 (BSL3) laboratory to assess whether the main protease can mutate to yield resistant strains of the virus,” Pfizer said. “It is important to note that these studies are required by U.S. and global regulators for all antiviral products and are carried out by many companies and academic institutions in the U.S. and around the world.”
Pfizer produces a COVID-19 treatment called Paxlovid, or nirmatrelvir that is authorized in the United States and some other countries.
In its statement, Pfizer did not dispute that Dr. Jordon Walker, who told a Project Veritas journalist that Pfizer is exploring how to “mutate” the COVID-19 virus, was or is a Pfizer employee.
Professional profiles for Walker, which have since been taken down, listed him as a director of messenger RNA research at the company. Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine utilizes messenger RNA. The profiles also listed a Pfizer email address, and an email sent to that address did not bounce back. A receptionist at Pfizer on Thursday also told The Epoch Times that Walker had an internal company profile, but a different receptionist on Friday said there was no listing for the doctor, indicating he might have been terminated after the comments were made public.
Malone
Dr. Robert Malone, who helped develop the messenger RNA technology, said that the experiments Pfizer described met the definition of “gain of function.”
“Pfizer is basically acknowledging that they are doing the same type of gain of function research that Boston University was caught doing, but they are denying that it is gain of function or directed evolution,” Malone wrote on Twitter.
Malone pointed to Pfizer’s comment about taking the original SARS-CoV-2 virus and using it “to express the spike protein from new variants of concern.”
Gain of function generally describes experiments that aim to increase functions of a virus such as transmissibility and virulence. Walker had said in his comments that the work he was describing was not gain of function, but “directed evolution.”
Researchers with Boston University revealed in 2022 that they had developed a strain of COVID-19 that killed 80 percent of mice infected with it.
The U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) is supposed to oversee risky research conducted in or funded by the United States but has faced criticism for only reviewing a handful of projects—none since 2019—under the oversight system.
The NIH funded gain of function experiments at the Wuhan laboratory situated near where the first COVID-19 cases were identified, and officials have promised to keep funding research in China.
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) had written a letter to Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla referring to Walker’s remarks and questioning whether the company has or is planning to mutate the COVID-19 virus.
Walker’s comments “are alarming,” Rubio wrote in the Jan. 26 missive.
YouTube Takes Down Video
In a notice sent to Project Veritas, YouTube cited its medical misinformation policy, which bars “claims about COVID-19 vaccination that contradict expert consensus from local health authorities or the World Health Organization (WHO).”
It wasn’t clear which authorities specifically YouTube was relying upon to rebut the video.
YouTube, which is owned by Google, did not respond to a request for comment.
O’Keefe noted that the claims in the video were made by a Pfizer director.
Project Veritas was given a “strike,” which prevents the organization from taking actions like uploading new videos for one week. A second strike would block such actions for two weeks and a third strike in a 90-day period would result in a permanent removal of the group’s account, YouTube warned.
Always interesting to see what parts get highlighted.
That's the thing.
It is totally worth looking into Pfizer and keeping them on a short leash, but when you have such bullshit people pushing for it, it makes it harder.
Note they don't highlight the "these studies are required by U.S. and global regulators".
Malone going back to that BS "Boston University made a super virus" story.
That's the thing.
It is totally worth looking into Pfizer and keeping them on a short leash, but when you have such bullshit people pushing for it, it makes it harder.
No, Project Veritas Video Doesn’t Prove Pfizer Is Mutating Covid-19, Who Is Jordon Trishton Walker?
No, Project Veritas Video Doesn’t Prove Pfizer Is Mutating Covid-19, Who Is Jordon Trishton Walker?
A Project Veritas video claimed that it featured someone named “Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer Director of Research and Development - Strategic Operations and mRNA Scientific Planning.”
Forbes Hit Piece on Project Veritas is Written By a Scientist Funded by... Guess Who!?
Forbes Hit Piece on Project Veritas is Written By a Scientist Funded by... Guess Who!?
I'll give you a hint. It rhymes with "riser"...
raheemkassam.substack.com
I'll give you a hint. It rhymes with "riser"...
Raheem Kassam
6 hr ago
This weekend, Forbes.com published a clumsy attempt to discredit the self-declared and first hand source – Jordon Trishton-Walker – who was caughton a Project Veritas hidden camera boasting about Pfizer’s active, dangerous mutation of the COVID-19 virus.
What Forbes doesn’t tell you is its author Dr. Bruce Y. Lee’s proximity to Pfizer, Inc. itself.
Dr. Lee’s argument against the veracity of the Veritas video boils down to this paragraph:
Dr. Lee would have known, if he had bothered to check, that search results related to Walker, especially on LinkedIn, were purged just moments after the Veritas video dropped:
But the argument that because this person doesn’t have easily Google-able results associated with their name, or that Urban Dictionary has a funny entry about it, is not an argument against Veritas, nor its claims. So why is Dr. Lee really pursuing this attempt to discredit James O’Keefe and his outfit? Well, to understand that we have to get into Dr. Lee’s own difficult online profile.
Lee, currently listed as “a systems modeler, computational, artificial intelligence (AI), and digital health expert, professor, writer, and journalist,” per his employer’s website at the City University of New York (CUNY) School of Public Health.
What you won’t easily find on Google, Forbes, nor on Urban Dictionary, is Dr. Lee’s long-standing affiliations with Big Pharma and indeed the corporate goliath his Forbes article appears to defend: Pfizer, Inc. For that you have to go into the bowels of medical journals, press releases, and grant proposals. But don’t worry, you don’t actually have to do it. I did it for you.
Off the bat Dr. Lee appears to be wildly compromised out of being able to write an article like this for Forbes. He has co-authored papers which not only have directly benefited firms like Pfizer and Moderna, but in fact which implicate him in the rushed roll-out of vaccines which are now being linked to myocarditis, strokes, and other injuries in tens of thousands of people. Britain even recently began paying out around $140,000 to those affected.
One of Dr. Lee’s early COVID interventions supporting Big Pharma.
As recently as June 2022, Lee was listed as an author on a study which featured a listed competing interest from one of his co-authors, which read: “JSW is a co-founder of Avail Bio and is paid expert work from Pfizer and Sanofi.”
Indeed Lee’s own employer, CUNY, announced they had received $17,000,000 for their Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York, a million of which came directly from the Pfizer Foundation and which caused the school to name a room the “Pfizer Foundation Room” in return. Lee has even used his Forbes column to promote the Pfizer-backed Cold Spring Harbor Lab’s work.
But perhaps the most galling example of Lee’s unethical behavior is this proposal from just shy of a decade ago, wherein Lee and his team whip out their begging bowl in search of a six figure grant from, you guessed it, Pfizer.
Evidence for the vaccine study in Mozambique exists here, here, here, and here, in case Lee and his team want to take a few notes from Trishton-Walker and start covering their online tracks. But don’t worry, I’ve backed it all up.
I’ve even made it easier to read, since contrary to Dr. Lee’s claims about Google.com: that website is not the be all and end all of journalistic research.
Indeed, Pfizer themselves have the Lee-led vaccine study listed on their list of “funded initiatives”. The site also lists the study as still “In Progress.” Pfizer’s own PDF demonstrating the link is available here.
Critics will say, “Oh, come on now. It’s just a few hundred thousand dollars here. A few million there. This happens all the time in pharmaceutical research and medicine. It’s not a big deal.”
This normalization is precisely why it’s a big deal.
People like Dr. Bruce Y. Lee can take to major publications and smear the opponents of their funders both with impunity and public ignorance of the matter, while their publications do nothing to highlight the very real conflicts of interest arising. This is malfeasance and corruption in both industries: science and media. And it is directly linked to Pfizer’s whopping advertising budget, which makes it one of the largest spenders on public relations and marketing in the entire world.
I have enquired with Forbes as to whether Pfizer has recently advertised with them. They haven’t yet responded. But it wouldn’t be the first time the publication finds itself at the nexus of Big Pharma interests and dubious editorial decisions.
Thank you for reading.
Last edited:
I think you are full of it!
Malone is the father of mRna ( the inventor of mRna ) his reputation is outstanding. And you are just a mediocre medical resident or medical student at most …most likely premed student because the amount of time you spend on Terb make be really doubtful that your a med student or medical resident. Probably never even published anything in a medical journal. You just like to slander Dr Malone due to your left wing idealogy ( libtard).
Last edited:
