Paris Hilton sex tape?

[Big Bear]

According to radio reports I heard on Friday you are right the video is her from 3 years ago when she was underage so to my mind that is the first argument against the tape being in public domain.

The second, more important reason is that apparently in the tape she is so drunk she is passed out so there is question as to whether the sex was consentual.

To me those two reasons outweigh the "public's right to know" and frankly either of them works for me.

In any event I have a lot of problems with a tape that is done without someone's consent, as apparently is the case here regardless of whether or not they are a public figure. I'm sure there are lots of things we all have done that we would not like in the public domain because of someone else's "right to know"

 

[LateComer]

ok stupid question here, i have seen the pics and all but who is this woman and why is she famous??

I hadn't heard of her either. When I read the title of this thread, I honestly thought it was about a video of a couple having sex in a Paris hotel.

 

[montreal]

I hadn't heard of her either. When I read the title of this thread, I honestly thought it was about a video of a couple having sex in a Paris hotel.

heheh, I thought the same! But yet again media blitz usually gets our simple little minds going!

 

[Snook.fr]

Do you really think it is right for everyone to be wanting this tape that was private?
Like I said I am downing you all, but do you not think she deservse some respect in this matter of privacy alone?

Kiarra

BULLSHIT !!!!!!!!

Kiarra, as they say, If you don't want to burn yourself, Don't play with Fire...right?
So if you don't want anyone watching a dude screwing your brains out, Don't tape !

Plain and Simple.

And BTW, celebrity comes with a BIG Price to Pay : The end of your Privacy.

Love you Too....)

Frenchy

 

[Keebler Elf]

I downloaded a portion of a "tape" and it certainly looks like her but in the vid she has a tat across her lower back and around her left bicep.

I haven't found any pics that show her having tats....any suggestions? (maybe I've got the wrong vid LOL)

That's not her - that's pornstar Krystal Steal.

 

[n_v]

Re: is this it?

Yup that's it

 

[Pablo Escobar]

I have downloaded the tape, or at least a damn good portion of it off of kaaza. Its def her, and u def see EVERYTHING, including her looking into the camera at the cameraman at one point. The size od the file isnt too too bad , if ur running DSL Cable. 22 086 KBs.

 

[jwmorrice]

More entertainment on the way

Here's a piece that appeared in the Globe and Mail today. Yup, everybody's heading to court.

jwm

"Paris Hilton sued by ex-boyfriend


Los Angeles — Paris Hilton's ex-boyfriend filed a $10-million (U.S.) slander lawsuit against the hotel heiress and reality TV star with whom he made a sex video three years ago.

Richard Salomon maintains in the suit that Hilton was an "active participant" in making the video but she and her family have waged a "cold, calculated and malicious campaign to portray Salomon as a rapist" to protect her image.

The suit, filed Wednesday in Los Angeles Superior Court, names Hilton, her parents and a publicist, Siri Garber.

Messages left for Garber on Thursday evening were not immediately returned.

Hilton's lawyers are threatening legal action against anyone who distributes the tape or fails to destroy their copy of it, but purported snippets have been offered on eBay.

Hilton family representatives have said they are trying to determine whether Salomon, 33, was involved in releasing the tape, which he denies.

Salomon's lawyer, Martin Singer, has said a friend of his client stole the tape.

Salomon, the estranged husband of former Charmed actress Shannen Doherty, contends in the lawsuit that the defendants "implied to the press" that Hilton was incapacitated and was therefore sexually assaulted during the 27-minute video.

In the suit, Salomon states that the Hilton "posed and preened" during the video, said "hi" to the camera and stops to answer her cell phone.

Hilton, who was 19 when the tape was made, is soon to star in Fox's new reality series, The Simple Life, set to launch on Dec. 2. In the show, she leaves the urban social scene to live in a rural, working-class environment.

 

[booboobear]

Re: is this it?

http://www.bangedup.com/Current/ParisGetsTheBeefin.wmv

Thanks lisa but i can't open it . Any hints, i'm dying to see it.

 

[booboobear]

According to radio reports I heard on Friday you are right the video is her from 3 years ago when she was underage so to my mind that is the first argument against the tape being in public domain.

The second, more important reason is that apparently in the tape she is so drunk she is passed out so there is question as to whether the sex was consentual.

Other reports say she was 19 and not drunk but made comments during the filming.

Her life is not private it's public and if she did not want it shown she should have complained when it was made not now.

 

[TravellingGuy]

Her life is not private it's public and if she did not want it shown she should have complained when it was made not now.

Her life is not private? Since when does any amount of fame or celebrity, or money in the family all of the sudde take away your right to privacy? Yes she and her ex-boyfriend made a sex tape, did she sign a waiver for its general release? From her fuss we can assume she didn't release it, and the ex-boyfriend is saying he had no hand in releasing the tape, well then its a stolen tape then isnt it?

Lets say Miramax makes a movie and they decide not to release it, they let it sit on their shelves, then some unscrupulous stock boy steals the film and releases it on the internet. Does Miramax now lose their rights to the film? Do the producers and proper identities who should have wreaked the profits receive anything in return?

Just because a tape is made does not make it public property, release forms are very important, without a proper release form you can be held liable.

 

[djk]

ok stupid question here, i have seen the pics and all but who is this woman and why is she famous??

She's the heiress to the Hilton Hotel Chain, she also models and has a show on Fox TV.

Her family is worth around $300 million.

Cheers,

-djk

 

[djk]

You'll have to get it from sexbrat.com.

Paid membership, of course.

Cheers,

-djk

 

[Goober Mcfly]

Selina: In the video I have seen, she says "Hi" to the camera and giggles. Now, knowing what I do about her, it would be possible that she would be saying that to the "mirror", but I highly doubt it.

AFAIK, she knew about the camera. I believe her lawyers have admitted to that.

 

[wrong hole]

If it was dark, then why would she look at herself in the mirror b/c she would not be able to see anything either.

...from the video, she was totally posing for the camera

also last night on ET or hardcopy or some crappy show like it....the show reported that Paris Hilton has made something like 10 videos having sex with different people...

 

[booboobear]

Her life is not private? Just because a tape is made does not make it public property, release forms are very important, without a proper release form you can be held liable.

It's funny how this just seems to keep happening to celebs.

Unfortunately, like it or not, public figures lives are sometimes not as private as ours.

 

[Goober Mcfly]

Perhaps she was saying Hi to the guy in the mirror's reflection.....Admitting to knowing about being filmed doesn't make sense......Why use infrared??

Dunno. Because it's more expensive?

BTW : cite for my previous post -> http://www.usatoday.com/life/2003-11-07-hilton-sex_x.htm

Although Hilton knew the video was being made, her representatives said, leaking the video was "horrendous and in such bad taste."

 

[TravellingGuy]

Unfortunately, like it or not, public figures lives are sometimes not as private as ours.

Its funny how your 'suck it up and accept it' attitude shows in regards to others but hey you'll raise a whole hell of a lot of stink over what dancer's make for a living, for $10 vs. $20 when it directly affects you.

I'm sure Princess Diana would love to hear your thoughts on how anyone (regardless of fame) is not entitled to their privacy, that they should accept the trauma that these incidents cause.

Wether or not Paris made 20 sex films, maybe she likes to videotape herself in the privacy of her own home, unless she's signing release forms, or intentionally producing them for the general public then she has every right to be upset and pissed off, and fight this in every way that she can.

 

[Goober Mcfly]

Selina: If she was being filmed secretly, I don't think she would have admitted to knowing she was being filmed.

 

[DenWa]

I have a Sony Hi-8 normal size handy-cam that has an infrared setting on it. Not some tiny spy camera. I can set it on the dresser and hit record and turn on the infrared light, and the footage will look exactly like the footage on the Hilton tape. She clearly looks at the camera several times, and says hello and waves in that way that everyone who has ever waved at a camera does.

DW