Would be grumpy w a leolist level experience at that price point and different expectation lol
Other high end ladies
- Thread starter ryan_ott
- Start date
I've been burnt before with that
I paid $500 hr for a boring session that left me disappointed and broke
Followed by a $260 hr that left me with a smile that lasted a week
Good luck bro
Curious as to who you found for $260 hr that left you with a smile!
DM's appreciated as well.
Those are trully unfortunate, but you can't put these bad experiences as general for all the $500 providers.
There are too many elements to take into consideration for a general statement.
That would be up to personal preference. I don’t think McKenna is enhanced, but other than that she absolutely meets the description! She offers a great service, she’s beautiful in real life, her location is clean & well maintained. She’s definitely one of the best in Ottawa if she is your type.
Fully agree with you
Not all disappointing sessions are 100% to blame on the SPs/MAs
And not all higher priced SPs/MAs are a waste of money
I just wanted to state that some higher priced sessions cannot guarantee a mind blowing time
Last edited:
You think what you want to think, and power to you, but she's maybe a 5. I'm looking for 8s/9s/10s. The 'spectrum of hotness' is not up to personal preference.
It literally is. There's no Scoville scale for women.
If you ask 100 men to say if a woman is a 1-10. I bet you 80-90 would be within +-1 point, and the rest would be outliers.
So if you look at it, there definitely is a scale.
But hey, you see beauty in all women, I respect that. I'm a shallow POS I guess. I prefer to see very attractive women.... 8-10s!
Your words babe. Sure, everyone’s entitled to a preference. Just funny how the loudest ones rating women like sports scores are never the ones getting picked for the team. McKenna moves in circles that don’t even know your scale exists. Stay humbled, spreadsheet Romeo.
I'm not sure about your analogy, as every male member on this website is not being "picked", but instead being a "pay-to-play".
Anywho, this thread has altered into a completely different topic. Let's get back on track.
True, she's not enhanced. But that makes her hotter in my book. Each to his own preference I guess.
Maddy, you are just incredible.
Haven’t been on TERB in months and find it so funny this is the first thread I see
Seriously, been moving in many different circles this year and forgot this board even existed!
In all honesty though, I don’t care about being one person’s 5, when I know I’m many people’s 8-10
C’est la vie!
Exactly, enhanced is a negative in my books. Mckenna looks good to me, partly because she looks natural.
To each their own, as you said.
Being so obsessed with ranking women to the point of negging the recommendations of other men is a beta move at best.
Men who understand that we are all beautiful in our own way and not devalued by the rest of the daisies in field are the ones who will always get extra kisses and attention.
