Ontario premier says US energy exports will be cut off if Trump imposes sweeping tariffs on Canada

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
2,957
2,456
113
Even with pictures you don't understand the stupidity of your own remarks when explained to you.
Yes, you tried admirably to distract with pictures, the stupidity of your statement implying that somehow violating the charter equals treason.
But as usual you failed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shakenbake

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
7,175
4,330
113
Yes, you tried admirably to distract with pictures, the stupidity of your statement implying that somehow violating the charter equals treason.
But as usual you failed.
What would you call it when a governing party violates the people's rights?
I'll wait...
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
2,957
2,456
113
What would you call it when a governing party violates the people's rights?
I'll wait...
Nice pivot.
Let us stick to dissecting your statement:
"I haven't violated the Canadian Charter of Rights so if you're so concerned about treasonous behaviour you may want to start elsewhere."
 

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
11,034
3,593
113
What would you call it when a governing party violates the people's rights?
I'll wait...
I'd call it:

Doug Fraud being Doug Fraud
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
7,175
4,330
113
Nice pivot.
Let us stick to dissecting your statement:
"I haven't violated the Canadian Charter of Rights so if you're so concerned about treasonous behaviour you may want to start elsewhere."
I've given you the opportunity to explain why a government violating the charter of rights can't be considered treasonous.

You don't seem to have a response. Not surprised.
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
7,175
4,330
113

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
2,957
2,456
113
I've given you the opportunity to explain why a government violating the charter of rights can't be considered treasonous.

You don't seem to have a response. Not surprised.
Nice attempt at staying with the pivot.
You said - "I haven't violated the Canadian Charter of Rights so if you're so concerned about treasonous behaviour you may want to start elsewhere."
Please explain where in Canadian law or the constitution, it is written that an individual as evidenced by your use of the pronoun "I" to refer to yourself, can commit treason by "violating charter rights" and how they would be able to in the first place?
I'd be interested in understanding the convoluted logic and mental gymnastics that it will take you to explain this one.
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
7,175
4,330
113
Nice attempt at staying with the pivot.
You said - "I haven't violated the Canadian Charter of Rights so if you're so concerned about treasonous behaviour you may want to start elsewhere."
Please explain where in Canadian law or the constitution, it is written that an individual as evidenced by your use of the pronoun "I" to refer to yourself, can commit treason by "violating charter rights" and how they would be able to in the first place?
I'd be interested in understanding the convoluted logic and mental gymnastics that it will take you to explain this one.
Are you daft?
I used the term to show you that unlike the Liberals, I haven't violated the charter.
They did.

Is that simple enough for you? Do you need picture to grasp the point?
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
2,957
2,456
113
Are you daft?
I used the term to show you that unlike the Liberals, I haven't violated the charter.
They did.

Is that simple enough for you? Do you need picture to grasp the point?
Jumping from one place to another I see.
I called your statement showing support to Trump's calling Canada the US's 51st state, "treasonous".
You responded with "I haven't violated the charter".
So I am asking you how you would be able to violate the charter, and where an individual such as you violating the charter is defined as treason.
You are not making sense.
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
7,175
4,330
113
Jumping from one place to another I see.
I called your statement showing support to Trump's calling Canada the US's 51st state, "treasonous".
You responded with "I haven't violated the charter".
So I am asking you how you would be able to violate the charter, and where an individual such as you violating the charter is defined as treason.
You are not making sense.
I'll ask again...are you daft?

The Liberals violated the charter. I said I didn't.

You seem to be confused. Did you start drinking early again today?
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
2,957
2,456
113
I'll ask again...are you daft?

The Liberals violated the charter. I said I didn't.

You seem to be confused. Did you start drinking early again today?
Nice pivot an attempt at moving goalposts.
You responded to my criticism of your statement as being "treasonous" because it was supportive of Trump, where he called Canada the US's 51st state.
You responded by saying "I have not violated the charter".
This is not about Liberals.
This is about you and about what you said.
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
7,175
4,330
113
Nice pivot an attempt at moving goalposts.
You responded to my criticism of your statement as being "treasonous" because it was supportive of Trump, where he called Canada the US's 51st state.
You responded by saying "I have not violated the charter".
This is not about Liberals.
This is about you and about what you said.
What I said is my opinion and not treasonous.
What I said about the Liberals is factual and by virtue of that fact and their conduct, can be considered treasonous.

The reason I mentioned the Liberals is to enlighten you on what a government who violates your rights can be considered.

Do you need a diagram or something? You seem confused.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
2,957
2,456
113
What I said is my opinion and not treasonous.
I am characterizing your opinion as treasonous.
After all if Canada was the US's 51st state, then that would only be possible if Canada lost its sovereignty.
How else do you characterize a statement supporting a foreign leader who ways that about Canada?
 
  • Like
Reactions: shakenbake

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
7,175
4,330
113
I am characterizing your opinion as treasonous.
After all if Canada was the US's 51st state, then that would only be possible if Canada lost its sovereignty.
How else do you characterize a statement supporting a foreign leader who ways that about Canada?
So you would call my free speech opinion treasonous but not call a government that has violated your rights treasonous?

Are you reading what you are typing or is everything blurry?
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
2,957
2,456
113
So you would call my free speech opinion treasonous but not call a government that has violated your rights treasonous?
I was not talking about the government neither in my first statement or in any of the ones following.
My comment was about your statement.
And anyway, I am curious.
In what way did the Liberals violate your charter rights?
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,817
6,807
113
He promised to impose "if"...

"If" in this context is a very powerful word.

It's already making Canada fix the border and NATO members live up to their commitments...if only you understood the big picture.
So I guess we're down to a simple question.

If Canada doesn't do what Donald demands, do you think Trump's proposed tariffs will make it more expensive for American consumers?
 

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
10,441
2,379
113
Trump is taking care of his country. Trudeau is not.

Is that too difficult a concept for you to understand?
Trump is taking care of himself and his billionaire backers... everything else is a con you apparently fell for...Doh!
 

glamphotographer

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2011
17,087
17,293
113
Canada
I’m no fan of DoFo but I appreciate seeing him stand up for Canada and Ontario…I would have preferred to see a stronger response from JT but it’s not his style to react that way.

I wish PP would get onside rather than exploiting this crisis for his own political gain.
PP will give Trump Alberta oil for free. Anything to suck Trump's cock.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon1

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
7,175
4,330
113
I was not talking about the government neither in my first statement or in any of the ones following.
My comment was about your statement.
And anyway, I am curious.
In what way did the Liberals violate your charter rights?
OMFG!
All this time and you have no idea that the Liberals were found in court (Jan 2024) to have violated the Canadian Charter of Rights?

Why don't you first educate yourself before you start arguing with people about things you have no clue about?
Try that.
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
7,175
4,330
113
So I guess we're down to a simple question.

If Canada doesn't do what Donald demands, do you think Trump's proposed tariffs will make it more expensive for American consumers?
Depends on the products and if it does make things more expensive, it's a short term pain for long term gain.
He's trying to make America great again if you haven't been paying attention.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts