The Porn Dude

Ontario offers to take John A. Macdonald statue removed in Victoria

Should the statues of Sir John MacDonald be removed

  • No

    Votes: 42 91.3%
  • Yes

    Votes: 4 8.7%

  • Total voters
    46
  • Poll closed .

LT56

Banned
Feb 16, 2013
1,604
1
0
Don't remove the statues, just put the good AND the bad on the accompanying plaque.
Yes...or maybe erect another statue honouring the victims of his abuse to stand alongside his statue.
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,682
21
38
Don't remove the statues, just put the good AND the bad on the accompanying plaque.
Yes...or maybe erect another statue honouring the victims of his abuse to stand alongside his statue.
Every day it gets harder to take you nitwits seriously.
 

omegaphallic

Well-known member
Mar 26, 2010
3,006
48
48
The problem with residential schools was that they were punished for practicing their own culture and there was physical and sexual abuse in those schools.

Speaking to First Nations people they say that this affected a generation of kids who weren't equipped to parent due to being sent to these schools.

As for the 4th line I'm going to chalk that up to trolling.

Me personally I don't have a feeling one way or the other for John A. He's far removed enough that he seems like an abstract concept. But I understand that people affected by residential schools would obviously feel differently and their feelings matter more than people who weren't affected.
A lot of people see him as an important part of their heritage and it's not your average FN person who asking for this, it's only a handful of FN activists who do not have the support of all FN peoples and mostly white antifa loving idiots, but FN people will get the blame for it, #Antifasowhite. How about we take that money and get FN clean drinking water and gradual funding for schools and training for trades.
 

ravencroft

Eternally pseudo-retired
Jul 2, 2005
705
100
28
As a Black Canadian I am surprised so many people give a shit, so I like to ask:
a) Are you even distantly-related to Sir John MacDonald?
b) Have you EVER mentioned him in casual day-to-day conversation (never been to a party where someone said "you know what was cool about Sir John A..."?)
c) Can you even tell us one non-Googled fact about his life off the top of your head, including his middle name (what the 'A' stands for)

If you can't answer YES to at least two of these three points, you probably shouldn't be getting yourself up in arms over a statue of a guy you know nothing about and never gave a shit about before someone asked to remove it.
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,872
242
63
As a Black Canadian I am surprised so many people give a shit, so I like to ask:
a) Are you even distantly-related to Sir John MacDonald?
b) Have you EVER mentioned him in casual day-to-day conversation (never been to a party where someone said "you know what was cool about Sir John A..."?)
c) Can you even tell us one non-Googled fact about his life off the top of your head, including his middle name (what the 'A' stands for)

If you can't answer YES to at least two of these three points, you probably shouldn't be getting yourself up in arms over a statue of a guy you know nothing about and never gave a shit about before someone asked to remove it.
I'd revise question c) so that the fact goes beyond the high school Canadian History textbook.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,485
12
38
The point is not the statues, but the message attached to them. We can rewrite that and move the bronzes as often as we're up to it. Simply removing and destroying that evidence of our collective past is the sort of dumb stuff that keeps us ignorant, stupid and prejudiced. It makes it more likely we'll be just as bad as any of the characters in the statues.
 
Last edited:

Conil

Well-known member
Apr 12, 2013
4,382
1,289
113
As a Black Canadian I am surprised so many people give a shit, so I like to ask:
a) Are you even distantly-related to Sir John MacDonald?
b) Have you EVER mentioned him in casual day-to-day conversation (never been to a party where someone said "you know what was cool about Sir John A..."?)
c) Can you even tell us one non-Googled fact about his life off the top of your head, including his middle name (what the 'A' stands for)

If you can't answer YES to at least two of these three points, you probably shouldn't be getting yourself up in arms over a statue of a guy you know nothing about and never gave a shit about before someone asked to remove it.
If you go with your 3 points we shouldn't give a shit of many other people like: Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela or Bob Marley all people that Imho should be honored or remembered.
 

Fathammer

Banned
Mar 9, 2018
961
0
16
Treat people like animals and this is what you get.


Don't even compare the abuse in those schools to what happens today. Not the same league. Not the same sport.
Firstly, they lived with the animals...nuff said.

Secondly, how much abuse and what type makes not in the same league as you mentioned?

Abuse is abuse.

If a man hits his wife with an open hand and another man hits his with his fist, whats the difference?

Going back to the subject, I mentioned in another post that what happened was basically a trial run. Like most things in life, you live and learn and try to fix things if they dont work. Hence our system today.

John A . had a vision. Was it a great idea? Probably not. It was in a primitive setting with primitive people. Did we learn? I hope so?

Remember, at one time it was ok to smoke in the mall. Was it a good thing? And have we come along and changed it? Do we tear down our past politicians accomplishments for letting us smoke in the mall not knowing second hand smoke was causing cancer to others?
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,872
242
63
Firstly, they lived with the animals...nuff said.

Secondly, how much abuse and what type makes not in the same league as you mentioned?

Abuse is abuse.

If a man hits his wife with an open hand and another man hits his with his fist, whats the difference?

Going back to the subject, I mentioned in another post that what happened was basically a trial run. Like most things in life, you live and learn and try to fix things if they dont work. Hence our system today.

John A . had a vision. Was it a great idea? Probably not. It was in a primitive setting with primitive people. Did we learn? I hope so?

Remember, at one time it was ok to smoke in the mall. Was it a good thing? And have we come along and changed it? Do we tear down our past politicians accomplishments for letting us smoke in the mall not knowing second hand smoke was causing cancer to others?
https://nationalpost.com/news/canad...-died-in-residential-schools-commission-finds

4000 died

How many kids die in schools today? How many die running away from school? How many commit suicide because of the school system (not bullying)?

Here's an article on the deplorable conditions

https://globalnews.ca/news/2402492/...ents-to-disease-abuse-experiments-trc-report/

How many kids today have been experimented upon? How many are kept close to diseased kids? How many kids are in fire traps?

https://www.ctvnews.ca/thousands-abused-at-residential-schools-stats-show-1.361325

Thousands of kids were abused 7K have come forward
 

harryass

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2010
3,252
953
113
Stupid move by city of Victoria. So are they going to take down and rename every other thing that was negative or offensive to first nations people? What next, rename Victoria to TorontoWest? Non thinking dingbat politicians, trying to make themselves look good to appease first nations wishes.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,761
3
0
Surprisingly enough Ravencroft , indeed I can answer yes to at least two of your questions, although of course you have deliberately rigged them.

Indeed Conil's post (#28) is entirely true!
 

Brill

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2008
8,679
1,193
113
Toronto
The cultural genocide of residential schools was still happening just 22 years ago, it’s not ancient history. PM Stephen Harper apologized on behalf of Canada.
I’d say keep the statues up along with reminders of how destructive our leaders have been.
 

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
10,732
2,739
113
Every day it gets harder to take you nitwits seriously.
I don't even try to take you seriously, but neither of our comments have anything to do with the topic of this thread. What is wrong with including the good with the bad, as long as it is the truth?
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,485
12
38
It's very sad that arguing bitterly and trading insults about something that's already done and finished is so typical of us here. The statue's gone.

What we'd be far better doing is discussing where best to re-erect it and with what message, or how to make melting it down a better message for those who come after us.
 

ravencroft

Eternally pseudo-retired
Jul 2, 2005
705
100
28
If you go with your 3 points we shouldn't give a shit of many other people like: Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela or Bob Marley all people that Imho should be honored or remembered.
Last time I checked there weren't dozens of statues of Martin Luther King Jr., Nelson Mandela, and certainly not Bob Marley littered across Canada. My point is regarding STATUES, and I still ask the question: "why does anyone give a shit"?

It's not like they're erasing his name from the history books, and Grade 10 history was the only time I was ever taught anything about the founding of Canada. Grade 8 history in Quebec where I grew up was Global history/civilizations (e.g. Egypt, Greek, Romans, etc.) and stopped with Columbus. Grade 10 history was the founding of Canada and the USA (mostly Canada and the Native tribes).
 

bazokajoe

Well-known member
Nov 6, 2010
10,623
9,288
113
Personally I think the statue should stay. It bothers me more that catholic schools are named after child molesting priests.The disgusting crimes that the Catholics have committed is more of a concern to me.People seem to give them a free pass for whatever reason.
 

yomero5

Well-known member
Jan 12, 2017
1,976
490
83
Every country in the world is laughing at us, that we allow a small, powerless minority to dictate to large powerful majority what to do. It's a complete joke.
 

Jasmine Raine

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2014
4,041
49
48
Every country in the world is laughing at us, that we allow a small, powerless minority to dictate to large powerful majority what to do. It's a complete joke.
Except they were the majority at one point, until a bunch of immigrants came and took over the land to make their own country, distorting a culture and way of life in the process.

I personally think the status should have stayed. I think adding to it, to learn of the mistakes made, would have been better.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,485
12
38
Every country in the world is laughing at us, that we allow a small, powerless minority to dictate to large powerful majority what to do. It's a complete joke.
No, not every country. Only the places you'd rather live.

No minority's dictating to this country — except maybe the minority of one currently in the White House — and I'm happy and proud of the choices and the efforts the majority of Canada is making through our governments and institutions to undo some of the damage we've done to the original peoples of this country and make a better future together.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts