He's still pretty blah looking. He's just not as pudgy. Who is this dude anyway?
He's still pretty blah looking. He's just not as pudgy. Who is this dude anyway?
read again- re. strip joint.You realize that you live in a fantasy world, JC. Most "lefties" on this board think that Boobs is a rightie troll. It's got SFA to do with actual trans rights. I went to the Rail and other strip joints literally 100's of times. And you call me a leftie.
Similar with the rest of the sad nonsense you just wrote.
It's a fully dressed little girl dancing while her mom and other women clap. What's wrong with you?read again- re. strip joint.Did you take your kid with you?
No, what's wrong with you?It's a fully dressed little girl dancing while her mom and other women clap. What's wrong with you?
Any different from this world?No, what's wrong with you?
Twitter is killing it.
www.instagram.com
Anyone who has had responsibility for these issues in the real world would be undeterred by the lack of "certainty" as to how the policy should be drafted, and whether anyone will try to test its limits. It's not possible to be "certain" how an arbitrator will react to every aspect of the policy. You won't even know who the arbitrator will be until a grievance goes forward to arbitration, and every arbitrator is likely to have slightly different views. As a result, you draft the policy to prohibit everything that could negatively affect the learning environment, and you let an arbitrator decide if the policy needs to be refined, and how. Policies are organic. They change and adapt over time and in response to legal rulings. That is no reason to shy away from the task at hand. The focus needs to be put back on education in Lemieux's classroom, in the school, and in the school board as a whole.Dress codes are really difficult because you have two choices and both can be fucked with if someone deliberately wants to fuck with them.
One - list EVERYTHING you think needs to be there, or otherwise put some very serious limitations.
This has the problem that people mostly hate it if it is too restrictive (everyone in a uniform) and it almost always means something gets left out, because you can't think of everything. Then someone who wants to fuck with it just works to the loopholes and you have to deal with shit all over again.
Two - go for some vague general sense like "professional", "appropriate", and so on.
This has the problem that it isn't strictly defined so you can end up with fights over what is appropriate or not and why.
The simple fact is that if someone is determined to fuck with the system and dares you to crack down on them, you can't do much about it. Either crack down on them and face the backlash (either in public or the lawsuit) or ignore them and deal with them giving a fuck you to the code.
Yes, you can't draft a perfect code that avoids all problems.Anyone who has had responsibility for these issues in the real world would be undeterred by the lack of "certainty" as to how the policy should be drafted, and whether anyone will try to test its limits. It's not possible to be "certain" how an arbitrator will react to every aspect of the policy. You won't even know who the arbitrator will be until a grievance goes forward to arbitration, and every arbitrator is likely to have slightly different views. As a result, you draft the policy to prohibit everything that could negatively affect the learning environment, and you let an arbitrator decide if the policy needs to be refined, and how. Policies are organic. They change and adapt over time and in response to legal rulings. That is no reason to shy away from the task at hand. The focus needs to be put back on education in Lemieux's classroom, in the school, and in the school board as a whole.
It's pretty clear that JC and Orry spend pretty much all day there.
That's my point. Again, you can't shirk your responsibility for the education of children because your draft code may get picked at by an arbitrator. That kind of dithering is not management material.Yes, you can't draft a perfect code that avoids all problems.
Some will just not draft a code at all because they think it is obvious teachers won't want to fuck with that kind of thing and an unspoken agreement will do. (After all, lots of people believe that over regulating something is bad.) This might bite them in the ass. Or they will draft a code and someone will use its loopholes against them. Thus drafting a code will bite them in the ass.
Pick your poison.
I don't think anyone is holding up the school board here as the paragons of management material.That's my point. Again, you can't shirk your responsibility for the education of children because your draft code may get picked at by an arbitrator. That kind of dithering is not management material.
Totally agree.To illustrate the point by comparison to another employment decision - do you know why companies fire employees when they know they don't have just cause and are probably going to end up paying significant severance? Answer - because that employee is doing so much harm to the business, replacing them is worth the cost.
You are welcome to make whatever guess you want.Likewise here, except I think this problem ends with a policy. Lemieux won't bet his job on defying the policy. He'll cook up some form of mental health leave and file a grievance over the policy. Teachers unions have no balls (they aren't reall unions - they never had to organize anyone - statute granted them bargaining rights), so they'll go through the theatre of pursuing the grievance, and everyone will know it's theatre, including the arbitrator.
This isn't about this one teacher, its part of a larger campaign against LGBTQ, trans and women's rights.Yes, you can't draft a perfect code that avoids all problems.
Some will just not draft a code at all because they think it is obvious teachers won't want to fuck with that kind of thing and an unspoken agreement will do. (After all, lots of people believe that over regulating something is bad.) This might bite them in the ass. Or they will draft a code and someone will use its loopholes against them. Thus drafting a code will bite them in the ass.
Pick your poison.
I feel sad that there's people who look at little girls having fun and have sexual thoughts.No, what's wrong with you?
...
You really shouldn't post selfies here.





