Oakville teacher wears huge prosthetic breasts to shop class

[curr3n_c1000]

Why would they be hostile to me liking boys or me feeling more comfortable with a different gender identity?

Yeah, you tell me? Why would they be hostile?

And sorry but most people have developed their sexual and gender identity long before 16.

YES, YES YES!!!! Now you are getting it.

That is why they want access to the children at a young age!!!!

Because if they don't, 99% of them will not identify with this and will move on with their life. They know this. That why it's an agenda.

That's why it's absolutely ridiculous to pretend they don't exist until 16 just so you feel comfortable. Are you under the impression that kids don't watch porn?

Do straight women watch lesbian porn? Yes or No.

 

[dirtyharry555]

Like I said. That is your version of truth. And you are confusing gender with sexual orientation and identity.

There is no version of truth. There is only truth.

 

[dirtyharry555]

Who is obsessed? The same people who always start these threads

Now Aretha Franklin's song Natural Woman is deemed OFFENSIVE to trans women: Outrage as 'activists' demand song is removed from Spotify and Apple Music

Group slams Aretha Franklin song as offensive, before backtracking

Released as a single by the Queen of Soul back in 1967, the stirring love ballad is now facing scrutiny - despite preaching positive messages in regards to women and femininity.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Stop bending for these weirdos.

It's okay to be normal and to ostracize mentally ill freaks that want to impose their sickness on you.

 

[toguy5252]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1617308709515890689

Hmm.........LOL...

Are you trying to prove my point?

 

[toguy5252]

There is no version of truth. There is only truth.

I quite agree and that is why I keep referring to your version of the truth as opposed to the truth.

 

[dirtyharry555]

I quite agree and that is why I keep referring to your version of the truth as opposed to the truth.

This isn't a left vs right issue. It's a normal vs weirdo issue. Choose accordingly.

 

[toguy5252]

Now Aretha Franklin's song Natural Woman is deemed OFFENSIVE to trans women: Outrage as 'activists' demand song is removed from Spotify and Apple Music

Group slams Aretha Franklin song as offensive, before backtracking

Released as a single by the Queen of Soul back in 1967, the stirring love ballad is now facing scrutiny - despite preaching positive messages in regards to women and femininity.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Stop bending for these weirdos.

It's okay to be normal and to ostracize mentally ill freaks that want to impose their sickness on you.

There are idots on all sdie but trying to gernalize from an isolated incident adds nothing to the conversation. If I had to post all of the moronic statements by righties terb would need a lot more bandwidth.

 

[Valcazar]

What happened to the party of personal freedom and liberty.

Nothing.
They still believe that they should have personal freedoms and liberty and other people shouldn't.
Same as it ever was.

 

[Dutch Oven]

Definitely not but I think you're just mixing terms. Freedom of speech and freedom of press almost never encouraged in school. Ask my teacher said freedom is out there not in here. School is a Dictatorship. Why they might not say That out loud anymore its still the case

Freedom of speech and freedom of the press are: 1) rights of citizens, but do not apply in all forums at all times (for example, freedom of speech does not apply in private sector workplaces), and 2) protections from government overreach.

Freedom of the press exists in Canada, but that doesn't give members of the press unfettered access to public schools. Freedom of speech does not permit teachers to use the classroom to promulgate their own crazy views on politics, society, or otherwise. They are supposed to stick to the parameters of the curriculum established by the school board. In turn, school board trustees are accountable to voters for the decisions they make concerning the curriculum.

I think what you are really highlighting, and where I agree with you, is the need for schools to encourage the processes of debate and discussion regarding topics within the curriculum about which reasonable people may hold different viewpoints. Debate and discussion is essential to development of critical thinking skills. Too often, our schools and teachers are focused on simply getting to the end of the curriculum as quickly as possible and with the least thought and effort possible. Sometimes, that is in service of specific political messaging that our school boards are promoting. We are starting to see the results of this approach as students enter the workforce, unable to make good decisions.

 

[toguy5252]

This isn't a left vs right issue. It's a normal vs weirdo issue. Choose accordingly.

Yes I agree entirely but I surprised that you have taken the weirdo side.

 

[toguy5252]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1617308709515890689

Hmm.........LOL...

LOL.. And yet you keep posting these things which you claim not to be obsessed with.

 

[silentkisser]

There are idots on all sdie but trying to gernalize from an isolated incident adds nothing to the conversation. If I had to post all of the moronic statements by righties terb would need a lot more bandwidth.

Yeah, I'm sure a small group of idiots on either side say crazy shit, but you can't use that to pain the entire group. Again, there is a reason why they call that site the Daily Fail...It's a right-wing tabloid that looks for the most outrageous statements or what not to paint a broad group of people as insane...

 

[dirtyharry555]

Yeah, I'm sure a small group of idiots on either side say crazy shit, but you can't use that to pain the entire group. Again, there is a reason why they call that site the Daily Fail...It's a right-wing tabloid that looks for the most outrageous statements or what not to paint a broad group of people as insane...

It's not about a small subset of idiots on any side.

The small group in all of this is the entire trans community. They're a tiny group of mentally ill people that need our help. Stop giving them more rope to hang themselves with.

 

[Frankfooter]

It's not about a small subset of idiots on any side.

The small group in all of this is the entire trans community. They're a tiny group of mentally ill people that need our help. Stop giving them more rope to hang themselves with.

You've never talked to anyone trans before, have you?

 

[mandrill]

Who is obsessed? The same people who always start these threads

Anyone who spends hours each day reading "Liberals of Tiktok" is pretty obsessed.

 

[mandrill]

Now Aretha Franklin's song Natural Woman is deemed OFFENSIVE to trans women: Outrage as 'activists' demand song is removed from Spotify and Apple Music

Group slams Aretha Franklin song as offensive, before backtracking

Released as a single by the Queen of Soul back in 1967, the stirring love ballad is now facing scrutiny - despite preaching positive messages in regards to women and femininity.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Stop bending for these weirdos.

It's okay to be normal and to ostracize mentally ill freaks that want to impose their sickness on you.

Leading the charge to have the song nixed is the Norway-based Trans Cultural Mindfulness Alliance (TCMA), a group started this year and has since made its presence known with a series of polarizing posts on social media. The post, perceived by many as satire, began by asserting the song is offensive to transgender people and that 'there is no such thing as a "natural" woman.' 'Aretha Franklin's 1968 song "Natural Woman" perpetuates multiple harmful anti-trans stereotypes,' the post reads, erroneously listing the song's September 1967 release as coming in 1968.

Oh look! It's the shitsheet Daily Mail driving clicks by milking a post by a Norwegian group that may or may not have made the post seriously and may or may not actually exist.

 

[Frankfooter]

Leading the charge to have the song nixed is the Norway-based Trans Cultural Mindfulness Alliance (TCMA), a group started this year and has since made its presence known with a series of polarizing posts on social media. The post, perceived by many as satire, began by asserting the song is offensive to transgender people and that 'there is no such thing as a "natural" woman.' 'Aretha Franklin's 1968 song "Natural Woman" perpetuates multiple harmful anti-trans stereotypes,' the post reads, erroneously listing the song's September 1967 release as coming in 1968.

Oh look! It's the shitsheet Daily Mail driving clicks by milking a post by a Norwegian group that may or may not have made the post seriously and may or may not actually exist.

That sounds like a group as legit as phil's gay against groomers.
And just as legit as libs of tiktok.

 

[basketcase]

Yeah, you tell me? Why would they be hostile?
...

So you're admitting that some parents conceptions can interfere with children's access to care and that children under the age of 16 have sexual impulses but still think people shouldn't be taught about them.


And pretty stupid that you see a conspiracy in this. There is no conspiracy to turn people gay or trans, simply recognizing that some people are.

 

[basketcase]

There are idots on all sdie but trying to gernalize from an isolated incident adds nothing to the conversation. If I had to post all of the moronic statements by righties terb would need a lot more bandwidth.

But some fringe idiot proves how evil wokeness is while the things mainstream conservative voices aren't important.

 

[curr3n_c1000]

So you're admitting that some parents conceptions can interfere with children's access to care and that children under the age of 16 have sexual impulses but still think people shouldn't be taught about them.


And pretty stupid that you see a conspiracy in this. There is no conspiracy to turn people gay or trans, simply recognizing that some people are.

basketcase are you admitting you think children should consent to surgeries like this and you believe them to be ethical and therapeutic?