tell it to your friends at Eni, BP, Shell, GUlf and ExxonMobile.
That cabal would just as soon sell OIL to RED China....
tell it to your friends at Eni, BP, Shell, GUlf and ExxonMobile.
That cabal would just as soon sell OIL to RED China....![]()
Don't you think they are doing that already?
tell it to your friends at Eni, BP, Shell, GUlf and ExxonMobile.
That cabal would just as soon sell OIL to RED China....
Don't you think they are doing that already?
Another evidence to prove you are an idiot. China has 3 gigantic government-controlled oil companies that rival to any of the so-called big oil. Never heard of PTR, SNP and CEO, eh?
Not a pinko like you so I don't follow them....
So the fact that one faction of the military is hoping, hoping, to build some new carriers is evidence that they are:
a) cost effective;
b) will be able to survive a high intensity environment:?
Seriously?
Not a pinko like you so I don't follow them....
Nothing wrong to follow them since they are the sugar daddies for ECA and TLM here, CHK and RRC in the States going forward when it comes to fund expensive shale gas projects and more importantly get the natural gas for the Chinese consumption.
And I haven't counted big oil like Exxon Mobil's XTO division yet, LOL.![]()
It would be interesting to know which union the floor monkey/village idiot (you choose) Woodrow belongs to, as we could then tell him that they probably invest in all the big money corporation that he so vents about. The union money doesn't just sit in a jar by the door.
Dunno but not going to be surprised the Unions are into ponzis, like Bernie Madoff and allegedly Uncle Sam.![]()
The proper question is how many times have carrier had to defend themselves against a first world opponent...like say...China...
I'd say the better question is (and much more telling) what country (first world, a world I would not yet put China in, or otherwise) has been willing to take on a carrier..... no one is that stupid.
I wonder what % of countries have less firepower than is resident in a single carrier battle group.... and we have a dozen I believe.
OTB
Nope, the Chinese prefer to do the exploration on their own, in places where the Democracies are not welcomed, say Libya, Sudan, Iran, Angola.
I'd say the better question is (and much more telling) what country (first world, a world I would not yet put China in, or otherwise) has been willing to take on a carrier..... no one is that stupid.
Funny you mention Sudan. Didn't the loony liberals chase a good Canadian company Talisman out of Sudan? Guess the PRC is now filling the void left by Talisman. Loony liberals are so dumb (Stalin use to call them "useful fools").
BTW, Talisman is still a value trap and people simply could not let go on their hmm Sudan investment before 2002.
The good news is that the only things that can threaten a carrier are nuclear submarines and atomic ballistic missiles. The bad news is that these two contraptions easily can take out a carrier.