That cabal would just as soon sell OIL to RED China....tell it to your friends at Eni, BP, Shell, GUlf and ExxonMobile.
That cabal would just as soon sell OIL to RED China....tell it to your friends at Eni, BP, Shell, GUlf and ExxonMobile.
Don't you think they are doing that already?That cabal would just as soon sell OIL to RED China....![]()
Suppose they are.Don't you think they are doing that already?
Probably Eni since the Italians are addicted to the Libyan oil.tell it to your friends at Eni, BP, Shell, GUlf and ExxonMobile.
Another evidence to prove you are an idiot. China has 3 gigantic government-controlled oil companies that rival to any of the so-called big oil. Never heard of PTR, SNP and CEO, eh?That cabal would just as soon sell OIL to RED China....
Nope, the Chinese prefer to do the exploration on their own, in places where the Democracies are not welcomed, say Libya, Sudan, Iran, Angola.Don't you think they are doing that already?
Well excuse me!Another evidence to prove you are an idiot. China has 3 gigantic government-controlled oil companies that rival to any of the so-called big oil. Never heard of PTR, SNP and CEO, eh?
Not a pinko like you so I don't follow them....
One has little to do with the other. They seem to be more than hoping. They're doing. The aircraft carrier acts as the linch pin for a multi level, multi-dimensional, multi-discipline battle group. You're trying to look at it in the isolated case. The whole system is built around the carrier. No other country does it better.So the fact that one faction of the military is hoping, hoping, to build some new carriers is evidence that they are:
a) cost effective;
b) will be able to survive a high intensity environment:?
Seriously?
Nothing wrong to follow them since they are the sugar daddies for ECA and TLM here, CHK and RRC in the States going forward when it comes to fund expensive shale gas projects and more importantly get the natural gas for the Chinese consumption.Not a pinko like you so I don't follow them....
It would be interesting to know which union the floor monkey/village idiot (you choose) Woodrow belongs to, as we could then tell him that they probably invest in all the big money corporation that he so vents about. The union money doesn't just sit in a jar by the door.Nothing wrong to follow them since they are the sugar daddies for ECA and TLM here, CHK and RRC in the States going forward when it comes to fund expensive shale gas projects and more importantly get the natural gas for the Chinese consumption.
And I haven't counted big oil like Exxon Mobil's XTO division yet, LOL.![]()
Dunno but not going to be surprised the Unions are into ponzis, like Bernie Madoff and allegedly Uncle Sam.It would be interesting to know which union the floor monkey/village idiot (you choose) Woodrow belongs to, as we could then tell him that they probably invest in all the big money corporation that he so vents about. The union money doesn't just sit in a jar by the door.
Even they're not that stupid. Ooooops! Wrong!!Dunno but not going to be surprised the Unions are into ponzis, like Bernie Madoff and allegedly Uncle Sam.![]()
I'd say the better question is (and much more telling) what country (first world, a world I would not yet put China in, or otherwise) has been willing to take on a carrier..... no one is that stupid.The proper question is how many times have carrier had to defend themselves against a first world opponent...like say...China...
The good news is that the only things that can threaten a carrier are nuclear submarines and atomic ballistic missiles. The bad news is that these two contraptions easily can take out a carrier.I'd say the better question is (and much more telling) what country (first world, a world I would not yet put China in, or otherwise) has been willing to take on a carrier..... no one is that stupid.
I wonder what % of countries have less firepower than is resident in a single carrier battle group.... and we have a dozen I believe.
OTB
Funny you mention Sudan. Didn't the loony liberals chase a good Canadian company Talisman out of Sudan? Guess the PRC is now filling the void left by Talisman. Loony liberals are so dumb (Stalin use to call them "useful fools").Nope, the Chinese prefer to do the exploration on their own, in places where the Democracies are not welcomed, say Libya, Sudan, Iran, Angola.
You live in a dream world bottie, as you smugly twirl your Pom-Poms while jumping up & down chirping, USA-USA-USA!I'd say the better question is (and much more telling) what country (first world, a world I would not yet put China in, or otherwise) has been willing to take on a carrier..... no one is that stupid.
Do you mean Libertards? They are just as loony as the Tories and their NDP cousins.Funny you mention Sudan. Didn't the loony liberals chase a good Canadian company Talisman out of Sudan? Guess the PRC is now filling the void left by Talisman. Loony liberals are so dumb (Stalin use to call them "useful fools").
When Talisman was in the Sudan, they brought with them the concept of democracy, human rights, etc. But, the loony liberals chased Talisman out of Sudan and guess who filled the void?BTW, Talisman is still a value trap and people simply could not let go on their hmm Sudan investment before 2002.
If they can find the carrier and get close enough to it to take a shot, AND if that country is willing to endure the never ending glow that would be the response..... you don't want to forget that there is no place on earth that the US can't rain massive precision guidance on - tomorrow, directly from the show me state.The good news is that the only things that can threaten a carrier are nuclear submarines and atomic ballistic missiles. The bad news is that these two contraptions easily can take out a carrier.






