What is the point then? I understand no BBFS, but no BBBJ? Come on! I'd rather save $200 and use my hand watching porn.
Ok so are you passing on ladies who state up front “safe only/no bbbj” or if bbbj is denied in room for whatever reason or just lamenting there are ladies you want to see who are cbj only? I can think of a few who sometimes I hope may switch from cbj but I’ve also experienced cbj only miraculously be not. Those are times I jsut count the luckyNot grooming or not showering has nothing to do with wearing a condom. This is not a hygiene post. I'm saying, I ain't paying $200 to get sucked off with a cover on.
I’m trying to understand who is forcing him to go ? or is this just a rate /services shame post?It's pretty simple. If you don't agree with the offerings, don't go.
She has every right to say "CBJ only", and you have every right to not text her.
What is the point then? I understand no BBFS, but no BBBJ? Come on! I'd rather save $200 and use my hand watching porn.
If they advertise no bbbj, I pass. I respect their decision, it’s just not for me. I don’t eat cake with the wrapper on.Ok so are you passing on ladies who state up front “safe only/no bbbj” or if bbbj is denied in room for whatever reason or just lamenting there are ladies you want to see who are cbj only? I can think of a few who sometimes I hope may switch from cbj but I’ve also experienced cbj only miraculously be not. Those are times I jsut count the lucky![]()
Exactly. And that’s what I said. Did you read my post.It's pretty simple. If you don't agree with the offerings, don't go.
She has every right to say "CBJ only", and you have every right to not text her.
There is a risk to everything in life. Maybe get another hobby if you think like this.Do you seriously think your little 500$ worth the risk of catching an STI![]()