Duclair signed on, and if no one told him he should fire his agent.
However, I’m surprised the NHLPA haven’t addressed this in the CBA before now. Tell Lou he’s a dinosaur at the bargaining table and let the other teams defend him and pay something in return. Maybe this has already happened and it was a bargaining chip for something else. But the human rights / religious freedom issue should be handled by the league and not left to one team.
From the link in post #1:
" Nearly two months after signing a four-year contract with the New York Islanders, forward Anthony Duclair decided to stop delaying the inevitable and cut off his hair. He knew this day would come, and after taking the summer to enjoy his final days with his long locks, Duclair did what he had to do."
I don't see that Duclair complained. He just posted a photo of his shorn locks. Other people are taking offense on his behalf, as if hair length/ style is a human rights issue.
Clearly the clean cut policy is enforced only in season. Duclair got a haircut because training camp is about to start.
Social media addicts who know dick about hockey chip in with 'It's not fair...he should be able to keep his hair, it's racist..." when they don't understand that it doesn't have to be fair. There is no vote, no consensus opinion, no polls nor petitions. No one's opinion of this policy matters except Lou Lamoriello's. Whether or not anyone other than Lamoriello agrees with the policy is irrelevant. Lamoriello is subordinate to Scot Malkin, 'governor' of the ownership group. Malkin could instruct Lamoriello to change the policy, but he won't. Spokesmen who speak and act on behalf of a Sports team don't pay much attention to Yahoo!News stories. Yahoo!News is the Internet's 'go to' site for news about Meghan Markle.