This was about a cap from the very start and if the owners get a cap then, in my opinion, they win.n_v said:The owners did cave .. abit. $45 million only aftect less then 10 teams, 7 or so. But Bob did fuck up form the beginning not accepting a cap in any from in principle before. I think he got the riot act read to him by his constituents when gary called it an end.
....and so did Bettman...he got fucked sideways by Goodenow on the last CBA...so now it was payback.....and Bettman played it out to the limit...Even in the cancellation of the season, Bettman left the door open just enough to get a deal done, and get the season going...Goodenow underestimated tjhe owners resolve to getting the cap, and public opinion, which is strongly behind management....not saying they are right, but the public thinks management is...yychobbyist said:This was about a cap from the very start and if the owners get a cap then, in my opinion, they win.
So let's put a cap of $80 million. According to you then the owners win because a cap is in place.yychobbyist said:This was about a cap from the very start and if the owners get a cap then, in my opinion, they win.
Who gives a fuck what you say.jimmy coldplay said:Why do people even care about hockey? It's such a second rate sport behind NBA, NFL, MLB.
No Americans watch hockey. Few TV stations want to pick up hockey as part of their programming. I predict hockey will be a dead sport within 3-5 years.
Season was over b4 today. Today was Gretzsky and Lemeux''s try at 'uncancelling' it. From all reports it was a disaster. Especially public relations wise. The players still think that the owner's owe them something bargaining wise. If the NHL $40 million was the most it could afford (repeatedly) but made tries to be creative to go to 42 then how does the NHLPA anything down the road is going to be any differnt to their favour.Asterix said:Six and a half hour meeting today, no progress made, no new meetings scheduled, Bettman and Goodenow not in attendance. The season is over. Get used to it.
It is crystal clear that Goodenow had no exit strategy and continues not to have one. The best offer the NHLPA is going to get was the one they turned down last Tuesday. They fail to realize that there isn't a pot of gold and the end of the rainbow and this ain't the farkin' Wizard of Oz! So Bob, if you are listening.....there ain't no Santa Claus either!n_v said:Season was over b4 today. Today was Gretzsky and Lemeux''s try at 'uncancelling' it. From all reports it was a disaster. Especially public relations wise. The players still think that the owner's owe them something bargaining wise. If the NHL $40 million was the most it could afford (repeatedly) but made tries to be creative to go to 42 then how does the NHLPA anything down the road is going to be any differnt to their favour.
Regardless of any deal the NHLPA accept, Goodenow job as excutive director is over. That has been made abundentaly clear.scubadoo said:It is crystal clear that Goodenow had no exit strategy and continues not to have one. The best offer the NHLPA is going to get was the one they turned down last Tuesday. They fail to realize that there isn't a pot of gold and the end of the rainbow and this ain't the farkin' Wizard of Oz! So Bob, if you are listening.....there ain't no Santa Claus either!
Yeah, but I guess there are some who still won't admit it. Considering Gretzsky had made a comment a month ago that he didn't think the league would be able to start up again until January of '06, I don't know what he thought he was accomplishing today. So now we have the first time in history where a major league in North America has cancelled an entire season due to a labor dispute. The league would do well to spend the time in the next few months to take a hard look at what is wrong with the game beyond the labor issues. Contraction seems inevitable, but rule changes are due also (getting rid of the red line springs to mind). If the lockout continues into late fall/winter you can stick a fork in this league.n_v said:Season was over b4 today.