Have you seen the "house" the owner of Mattamy lives in?tboy said:My point being don't go in there thinking the developer is rolling in cash on every house they sell......sure they make money but not as much as you think.
No, but that really is irrelevant. If you sell 10,000 houses at $6,500.00 profit each, that is still $65,000.000.00 profit but they wouldn't have that profit if they sold the houses at a loss now would they?dcbogey said:Have you seen the "house" the owner of Mattamy lives in?
That is true but that only applies to the big boys...many smaller ones can't afford to do it and often get nothing but headaches. But one thing I've learned recently: in Toronto, if a developer doesn't get his way with the city, he can simply go to OMD and more likely than not, they approve whatever the hell he's asking for because the only thing Ontario cares about is the tax base. They don't care if the building is ugly, over the density, going to strain the city's resources etc.LancsLad said:They do a nice enough volume that the main "family" businesses in the developers game can afford whatever they want and pay off as many regional and local councillers as they need. Some people collect stamps or coins, they collect politicans.
the guy may have made $4K on each townhome, but ask him how much he made on the project management fees on the development. usually 3-5% of total budget. this is considered a "cost" to the budget and included add that to his margins and he is doing pretty good. Especially if he has a few prjects on the go.tboy said:No, but that really is irrelevant. If you sell 10,000 houses at $6,500.00 profit each, that is still $65,000.000.00 profit but they wouldn't have that profit if they sold the houses at a loss now would they?
To put it another way: when you buy windows Vista at a computer store: do you negotiate a cheaper price? And the house that the owner of Mattamy lives in is a run down shack compared to Bill Gate's......
Anyone know those townhouses that are being built at royal york/islington just south of the QEW? About 8 yrs ago when they just were starting phase 1 I met the principal of the company building them. When we were talking about costs etc he let on that he only made about $4,000.00 clear profit per unit when it was all said and done. Now that is the company's profit and is on top of his nice salary and bonus' etc but still, when you think about it, you can make that much, and more, selling cars......
For the record BOTH developers said it was more a labour of love than a get rich business. They both said that is what they wanted to do, and that is the main reason they did it. Sure they both made a nice living out of it but they both said there is easier and less risky ways to make better money.
Think of it this way: say Mattamy starts a development and starts building houses. Then the bottom drops out of the market and they can't sell ALL the properties. Do you think they can just leave the lots vacant? I know some do but many contracts with the city etc stipulate that a house must be built on the property within x amount of time. Then the developer has to carry the mortgage on those empty houses. Same as condo developments: the builder has to carry the cost and maintenance etc on units that don't sell. That is a tremendous overhead to risk......
tboy,tboy said:Well the project management fees are (in the developments I worked at) are eaten up by, ahem, project management. Each had a staff of about 10 or so overseeing the project. Just guessing that each made about $50K so that's half a mil right off the top. And as we all know, that employee costs run about 30 - 40 percent of the wage so that's another $200K. So we're talking a cool 3/4 mil.
For the record, at one development (condos) I was out with the principal for lunch. We were going over all the headaches etc and (backstory, I've known him for about 8 yrs, been to his house, know his kids etc) I asked him: seriously, how much are you going to make on this project when it's all said and done because these deficiencies are killing us. He said "honestly? about a million...." and I said "whoa, that's not much considering how much it's costing you to put up" he said "well, a million's a million no matter how you slice it...".
Think of it another way: costs 20 mill to put up a building, he makes 1 mil on it, that's what....5 %??? not very much!!!! I worked for companies that freaked if they didn't hit 50% profit......
agreed. take Degasparis and his Seaton lands in pickering. Buy farm land at $40K/acre and rezone it to $500K/acre. obviously u quote the higher amount on your budget to the bank to reduce amount of cash equity u gotta plow in project.Sukdeep said:York Region, particularly the 404/48 corridor. I'm not talking about the city. There is a lot of land that is owned by developers in the greenbelt. I'm talking about north Richmond Hill and Markham. All that land has been owned for decades by developers. The "cost" to them was a lot lower than the value that is now being used to compute their per unit profits. That was my only point.