Eh ...
What year is it again???
guyroch said:NBA Finals .... Lakers vs Celtics ....
What year is it again???
guyroch said:NBA Finals .... Lakers vs Celtics ....
slk55amg said:Easy with the extreme comments, Bill Walton.
The networks, who are determining things such as these (like they did for the 2-3-2 format and not necessarily because of team travel) clearly have more experience in this than you do.
Loads of prep required to produce an NBA Finals. Two days to do so would be ludacris especially since you don't know who the opponents are until now. And just because you are following the playoffs and watching them doesn't necessarily mean everyone else is. Two days would cripple their ability to market and hype the NBA's final product for maximum viewership. A guaranteed two Sundays also has less rhythm to a series as it forces large two-day breaks between home games.
slk55amg said:Easy with the extreme comments, Bill Walton.
The networks, who are determining things such as these (like they did for the 2-3-2 format and not necessarily because of team travel) clearly have more experience in this than you do.
Loads of prep required to produce an NBA Finals. Two days to do so would be ludacris especially since you don't know who the opponents are until now. And just because you are following the playoffs and watching them doesn't necessarily mean everyone else is. Two days would cripple their ability to market and hype the NBA's final product for maximum viewership. A guaranteed two Sundays also has less rhythm to a series as it forces large two-day breaks between home games.
lawyerman said:My schedule would be as follows:
Sun Jun 1 - Boston
Tue Jun 3 - Boston
Thu Jun 5 - LA
Sun Jun 8- LA
Tue Jun 10 - LA
Fri Jun 13 - Boston
Sun Jun 15 Boston
Typical Bill Walton.lawyerman said:Are you employed by the NBA? ...my schedule makes perfect sense...
slk55amg said:Typical Bill Walton.
I am neither critizing your thought process nor arguing the validity of your points or if it makes sense. My post was only commenting on your position that the schedule is "absolutely asinine". Obviously not so, since you have now changed your tune from a 2 day break to 4 days with my simple "need more prep" reasoning.
The game dates/time for the Finals are determined prior to the outcome of the Conference Finals...significantly prior. You would know this Bill, because advertisers determine their time buys on the network based on a schedule. And the networks determine the schedules ahead of time, right? That means doing so before the outcome of the round 3...sooo if the ECF went to a game 7 (Sundays are great days for a game 7s, no?)...the Finals would start 4 days later on...wouldn't you know it...Thursday June 5.
Maybe just me, but I found your "asinine" comment a little ignorant, somewhat patronizing, and all posture. Hey, maybe you are a lawyer...if so, carry on
As for my NBA employment...what would be so surprising if I worked for MLSE...and that the perks are great?
lawyerman said:The Celtics were solid last night. You can't say enough about Paul Pierce who really gutted it out with that sprained right knee. He has been with so many awful Celtics teams and stuck with them through thick and thin. Now he might have the chance to win the Championship. Can't wait for game two.
guyroch said:Wow I predicted Lakers in 5 ... Still find its hard to believe that a team that
lost 3 times to the Hawks is up 2-0 against a team that beat the Spurs in 5 ..
Still Lakers will take it in 7 ...
guyroch said:What the hell happened .... Went to Bed and the Lakers were kicking Celtic
Butt ... Wake up and Celtics are up 3-1 in series ..![]()
guyroch said:Well here is hoping Lakers go back to Boston down 2-3 and take a lesson from the Celtics on how comebacks are done ..![]()