If I had a billion or so to spend, and I thought I would make a reasonable ROI, I probably would.elmo said:Then perhaps you should pony up the cash and buy the airline.
If I had a billion or so to spend, and I thought I would make a reasonable ROI, I probably would.elmo said:Then perhaps you should pony up the cash and buy the airline.
Actually Joe, let's not get carried away. Muslims break the law everyday and are arrested and punished for it. Just like anyone of any religions.S.C. Joe said:What about that Asian guy who shot and killed 32 students at that school in the USA a few winters ago...if he was a muslim the media would have called that act a terrorist act.
What about all this fraud on Wall Street that cost many of us lots of cash...if those bankers were muslims, it be a "terrorist" act.
When a muslim breaks the law it is a "terrorist" act but when others do harm to many people, its just a normal crime.
another fart in the wind from a newbie.....arthurfonzerelli said:Of course you would. Because the story, as it stands, conflicts with your world-view. Why is this a surprise to anyone? Why bother posting your intellectual conundrum for all to see?
ROTFL
Next.
and yet another fart in the wind from a newbiearthurfonzerelli said:*yawn* Yet again, you fail to see the point, or don't want to admit you're wrong.
Either way, have at it.
as do I.......and in your case, it is a BASKETcase.......arthurfonzerelli said:ROTFL
I rest my case.
LOL this coming from an idiot with the name of a character from a 70's TV show???arthurfonzerelli said:Wow. That sounds like a joke I heard from my eight year-old nephew not too long ago. You guys must have the same source for your material.
LOL
Thanks for proving my point, tboy. You rock.
tboy said:But it is things like the honor killing of the muslim daugher up here in Ontario that bring the religion bad press as it were. That wasn't labeled a terrorist act was it?
.
Sorry Joe, I didn't realize that one had to commit a crime against a large number of people. But in that case, the idiots on wall street didn't commit any crimes so whether they were muslim, christian or buddist, it wouldn't have mattered.S.C. Joe said:No it wasn't but a large group of people were not hurt or killed...name one time when a muslim has harmed or killed a large number and the act wasn't called a terrorist act.
I don't know who you were responding to, but the story as it stands today is plainly incomplete.arthurfonzerelli said:Of course you would. Because the story, as it stands, conflicts with your world-view.
Sure. Now how long does it take TSA to process those updates from the FBI? Do they have an agent review the changes? Do they update that data on a daily basis? Or is it an overnight thing?arthurfonzerelli said:But, just for kicks ...
"The Terrorist Screening Center, which is part of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, maintains the U.S. government's Consolidated Terrorist Watchlist."
"TSA is a major customer of the Terrorist Screening Center, using their information to determine Selectees, people who are subject to extra screening, and No Fly individuals, who are not permitted to board a plane under any circumstances."
I have to agree with you here fuji, there was a story going around earlier last year about a guy who had the same name as a terrorist and was put on the No Fly list. I think it took him a year or more to clear his name......fuji said:My point is the old saying--never attribute to malice what can be attributed to stupidity.
I find it is much more likely that the government has some slow and stupid process for getting people off watch lists, than that there is institutionalized racism in place.
What is the EXPECTED turnaround time between clearing someone and getting them off the watch list?
I bet it is days, not hours, if not weeks.