What rapes?
The OP was total bullshit and totally misquoted a report.
Where have we seen this kind of false accusation about mass rapes before?
Muslim Rape Gangs Targeted Tens of 1000s of Poor White Girls as Authorities Ran Cover
- Thread starter GameBoy27
- Start date
The OP was total bullshit and totally misquoted a report.
Where have we seen this kind of false accusation about mass rapes before?
The Biggest Peacetime Crime—and Cover-up—in British History
www.thefp.com
The Biggest Peacetime Crime—and Cover-up—in British History
The serial rape of thousands of English girls went on for many years. Few in power cared. Then Elon Musk started tweeting.
www.thefp.com
Repeating debunked links after they've been debunked doesn't make you look any better.The Biggest Peacetime Crime—and Cover-up—in British History
The Biggest Peacetime Crime—and Cover-up—in British History
The serial rape of thousands of English girls went on for many years. Few in power cared. Then Elon Musk started tweeting.
More on Pakistani crazies that attack with cleavers
I'm sure it still happens, no matter how much muslims try to deny it.The Biggest Peacetime Crime—and Cover-up—in British History
The Biggest Peacetime Crime—and Cover-up—in British History
The serial rape of thousands of English girls went on for many years. Few in power cared. Then Elon Musk started tweeting.
I'm sure you will believe it happened regardless of evidence.
Documentary on grooming gangs, Britain's shame. Listen to first-hand testimony of victims as they identify their assailants.
Nah, its just where the conspiracy theorists are all headed.I'm trying to decide if you doing some sort of Johnathan Swift-like satire here...
Grooming Gangs: Quilliam & the Myth of the 84 Percent
1) Welcome back, I didn't see you post over christmas
2) you REALLY want to put "myth" together with what happened in Rotheringham and others areas? Wait, .....you don't think it's true do you?
Please click the link below to read the full story ...
"I feel like many people still don’t quite understand the level of depravity inflicted on those little girls — or just how young they were. Think of your sister, daughter, or granddaughter as a child. Picture them. Think of how young and vulnerable they were.
Lucy Lowe was 14.
Vicky Round was 12.
Becky Watson was 11.
Charlene Downes was 11 or 12.
Sammy Woodhouse was 14.
Victoria Agoglia was 13.
Sarah Wilson was 11.
And there are countless more. They were children. Many barely out of primary school, so young and in no way responsible for the atrocities committed against them.
Think about what gangs of Pakistani-Muslim men put those little girls through. Now imagine it was your sister, daughter or granddaughter..."
x.com
"I feel like many people still don’t quite understand the level of depravity inflicted on those little girls — or just how young they were. Think of your sister, daughter, or granddaughter as a child. Picture them. Think of how young and vulnerable they were.
Lucy Lowe was 14.
Vicky Round was 12.
Becky Watson was 11.
Charlene Downes was 11 or 12.
Sammy Woodhouse was 14.
Victoria Agoglia was 13.
Sarah Wilson was 11.
And there are countless more. They were children. Many barely out of primary school, so young and in no way responsible for the atrocities committed against them.
Think about what gangs of Pakistani-Muslim men put those little girls through. Now imagine it was your sister, daughter or granddaughter..."
x.com
x.com
Samantha is a 20 year old far right activist.Please click the link below to read the full story ...
"I feel like many people still don’t quite understand the level of depravity inflicted on those little girls — or just how young they were. Think of your sister, daughter, or granddaughter as a child. Picture them. Think of how young and vulnerable they were.
Lucy Lowe was 14.
Vicky Round was 12.
Becky Watson was 11.
Charlene Downes was 11 or 12.
Sammy Woodhouse was 14.
Victoria Agoglia was 13.
Sarah Wilson was 11.
And there are countless more. They were children. Many barely out of primary school, so young and in no way responsible for the atrocities committed against them.
Think about what gangs of Pakistani-Muslim men put those little girls through. Now imagine it was your sister, daughter or granddaughter..."
x.com
Why do you think she's believable?
These men come from cultures where paedophilia, inbreeding, and abuse of women is commonplace. From cultures where a woman wearing normal western clothing is seen as too revealing and that makes her a whore.
You think integration is going to occur under mass immigration from such places? You have to be out of your mind.
bmcwomenshealth.biomedcentral.com
"With 65%, Pakistan has one of the highest rates of cousin marriages globally, followed by India (55%), Saudi Arabia (50%), Afghanistan (40%)"
The only reason why it's not happening in Canada yet is numerical demographics. Once critical mass is reached, it'll be here too.
Canada is not special.
Scandinavian countries thought they were special too and they've come to realize how wrong they were... but it's too late.
You think integration is going to occur under mass immigration from such places? You have to be out of your mind.
Consanguineous marriages and their association with women’s reproductive health and fertility behavior in Pakistan: secondary data analysis from Demographic and Health Surveys, 1990–2018 - BMC Women's Health
Background Pakistan has been showing consistently the highest prevalence of consanguinity. The popularity of consanguineous marriages is not declining in the country, because of social, cultural, and religious beliefs as well as economic advantages. However, couples also face various...
bmcwomenshealth.biomedcentral.com
"With 65%, Pakistan has one of the highest rates of cousin marriages globally, followed by India (55%), Saudi Arabia (50%), Afghanistan (40%)"
The only reason why it's not happening in Canada yet is numerical demographics. Once critical mass is reached, it'll be here too.
Canada is not special.
Scandinavian countries thought they were special too and they've come to realize how wrong they were... but it's too late.
Last edited:
Some parts in Afghanistan practices "Bacha Bazi" as well, fucking animals.These men come from cultures where paedophilia, inbreeding, and abuse of women is commonplace. From cultures where a woman wearing normal western clothing is seen as too revealing and that makes her a whore.
You think integration is going to occur under mass immigration from such places? You have to be out of your mind.
Consanguineous marriages and their association with women’s reproductive health and fertility behavior in Pakistan: secondary data analysis from Demographic and Health Surveys, 1990–2018 - BMC Women's Health
Background Pakistan has been showing consistently the highest prevalence of consanguinity. The popularity of consanguineous marriages is not declining in the country, because of social, cultural, and religious beliefs as well as economic advantages. However, couples also face various...
"With 65%, Pakistan has one of the highest rates of cousin marriages globally, followed by India (55%), Saudi Arabia (50%), Afghanistan (40%)"
The only reason why it's not happening in Canada yet is numerical demographics. Once critical mass is obtained, it'll be here too.
Canada is not special.
Scandinavian countries thought they were special too but they've come to realize how wrong they were... but it's too late.
Outrage as Wikipedia changes grooming gangs article to ‘moral panic’ from the 'Far-Right'Samantha is a 20 year old far right activist.
Why do you think she's believable?
The Wikipedia page for the national grooming gangs scandal has had its title updated to describe it as a “moral panic” popularised by the "far-right".
The change has been described as “disgusting” and “repulsive” by whistleblowers and survivors of the national atrocity, which saw thousands of girls systematically abused by gangs of predominantly Pakistani men.
Outrage as Wikipedia changes grooming gangs article to ‘moral panic’ from the 'Far-Right'
Thousands of girls have been systematically abused by Pakistani rape gangs in national scandal
www.gbnews.com
what they call "Far-Right" should be called "Right-so far"
So here is what Wiki says and - Oh my God!!!! - it's a lot different from what the 1000's of almost identical posts said on Twitter said last weekend.....
en.wikipedia.org
Statistics
The true number of offences remains doubtful, generally assumed to be larger, due to expected unreported cases of child abuse.[7] Some 90% of the sexually abused children were abused by people who they knew, and about one out of every three abused children did not tell anyone else about it.[2] The vast majority of child sex offenders in England and Wales are male, with men representing 98% of all defendants in 2015/16. A 2020 report by the Centre of Expertise on Child Sexual Abuse stated that "In the records of defendants prosecuted for child sexual abuse offences" among those in which ethnic background was recorded "the vast majority were white (89%); 6% were Asian, 3% were Black, 1% were from mixed ethnic backgrounds and 1% were from "other" ethnic backgrounds."[8]. The Ministry of Justices prison population statistics (2020) show the total number of convicted sexual offence prisoners with an associated child sexual abuse offence to be 8,345. Of this number 43 did not have their ethnicity recorded or stated. Of those with recorded ethnicity, white prisoners were the majority with a total of 7,353. 464 were Asian, 310 were black and 175 were mixed and 'other'.[9] A 2020 report on child sexual exploitation published by the Home Office warns of a "potential for bias and inaccuracies in the way that ethnicity data is collected" with the possibility of "greater attention being paid to certain types of offenders."[10]
Group-based child sexual exploitation
Group-based child sexual exploitation and localised grooming are terms used to describe a series of group-based child and adolescent sexual exploitation cases in the UK,[15] of which the youngest victim was 12 and the oldest was 18.[16]
A 2013 report by the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee describes a group first making contact with the child in a public place.[17] After the group's initial contact with the child, offers of treats (takeaway food, cigarettes, drugs) persuade the child to maintain the relationship.[17] Sometimes a boy similar in age presents himself as a "boyfriend"; this person arranges for the child to be raped by other members of the group.[17] Children may end up being raped by dozens of these group members, and may be trafficked to connected groups in other towns.[17] The Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre defines "local grooming" as follows:
These cases prompted several investigations looking into how prevalent British Asian backgrounds were in localised grooming; the first was by Quilliam in December 2017, which released a report entitled "Group Based Child Sexual Exploitation – Dissecting Grooming Gangs", which claimed 84% of offenders were of South Asian heritage.[23] However this report was criticised for its unscientific nature and poor methodology by child sexual exploitation experts Ella Cockbain and Waqas Tufail, in their paper "Failing Victims, Fuelling Hate: Challenging the Harms of the 'Muslim grooming gangs' Narrative" which was published in January 2020.[24][25]
A further investigation was carried out by the British government in December 2020, which concluded that:[26][27]
In 2023, then Prime Minister Rishi Sunak stated that victims of such gangs have been overlooked due to concerns about political correctness. In contrast, Alexis Jay, who led the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham, had previously said in 2015, "I have an aversion to phrases like that", attributing the governments' inaction to "their desire to accommodate a community that would be expected to vote Labour, to not rock the boat, to keep a lid on it, to hope it would go away".[29]
This initiative followed comments by Home Secretary Suella Braverman, who stated that perpetrators in high-profile grooming gang cases are predominantly "groups of men, almost all British-Pakistani." Her remarks sparked criticism, with some accusing her of employing a "dog whistle" and perpetuating stereotypes. The Home Office clarified that her comments were based on three specific cases in Rochdale, Rotherham, and Telford.[30][31]
Reviews of the Rotherham, Rochdale, and Telford cases have identified several common factors. Offenders often worked in night-time industries like takeaways and taxis, providing access to vulnerable children.[32]
British media has been accused of perpetuating Islamophobia by "conflating the faith of Islam with criminality, such as the headlines 'Muslim sex grooming'", as well as pursuing sensationalist coverage.[33] A number of academics have described the controversy as a moral panic.[34] In one academic paper, media outlets, including The Times, The Daily Mail's Mail Online, The Guardian and The Telegraph, were accused of boosting the moral panic by creating "Folk devils" from a perceived masculine threat in young South Asian men, especially in the wake of various high profile sex abuse scandals.[35]
The Muslim Council of Britain has called on investigations to "adhere to the facts of the matter, rather than deploying deeply divisive, racially charged rhetoric that amplifies far-right narratives and demonises an entire community."[31]
Rishi Sunak has called arguments against using the term "grooming gangs" as political correctness that fails victims.[36] Other Conservative Party politicians, such as Home Secretary Suella Braverman, argue that use of the phrase "grooming gang" is simply "unfashionable facts."[31] Braverman wrote in a 2023 opinion piece that "grooming gang" members in the United Kingdom were "groups of men, almost all British-Pakistani, who hold cultural attitudes completely incompatible with British values". In response, the Independent Press Standards Organisation issued a correction stating that Braverman's article was "misleading", since it did not make it explicit that she was talking about the Rotherham, Rochdale and Telford child sexual abuse scandals in particular.[30] Many organisations called on her to withdraw her comments due to amplifying far-right ideologies.[31] Some researchers and organisations, including the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) have argued that Braverman's focusing primarily on South Asian men simply fuels "misinformation, racism and division."[37][38] NSPCC argues that "a singular focus on groups of male abusers of British-Pakistani origin draws attention away from so many other sources of harm".[38] Reporting in The Guardian stated that the term "grooming gang" is "seen by many child protection professionals as legally meaningless and tainted by racism".[38]
In 2013, BBC Inside Out London investigated allegations made by members of the Sikh community that British Sikh girls living inside Britain were being targeted by men who pretend(ed) to be Sikhs.[39] However an investigation by the Sikh scholar Katy Sian of the University of York found no truth to the allegations and instead found it was an allegation being pushed by extremist Sikh groups.[40][41] Further reports compiled by the British government and child sex exploitation scholars also confirmed there was no evidence to this.[24][42]
Child sexual abuse in the United Kingdom - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Statistics
The true number of offences remains doubtful, generally assumed to be larger, due to expected unreported cases of child abuse.[7] Some 90% of the sexually abused children were abused by people who they knew, and about one out of every three abused children did not tell anyone else about it.[2] The vast majority of child sex offenders in England and Wales are male, with men representing 98% of all defendants in 2015/16. A 2020 report by the Centre of Expertise on Child Sexual Abuse stated that "In the records of defendants prosecuted for child sexual abuse offences" among those in which ethnic background was recorded "the vast majority were white (89%); 6% were Asian, 3% were Black, 1% were from mixed ethnic backgrounds and 1% were from "other" ethnic backgrounds."[8]. The Ministry of Justices prison population statistics (2020) show the total number of convicted sexual offence prisoners with an associated child sexual abuse offence to be 8,345. Of this number 43 did not have their ethnicity recorded or stated. Of those with recorded ethnicity, white prisoners were the majority with a total of 7,353. 464 were Asian, 310 were black and 175 were mixed and 'other'.[9] A 2020 report on child sexual exploitation published by the Home Office warns of a "potential for bias and inaccuracies in the way that ethnicity data is collected" with the possibility of "greater attention being paid to certain types of offenders."[10]
- England: In 2016–17 there were 43,522 recorded sexual offences against children under 16 years old, and a further 11,324 offences against young people aged over 16 and under 18. Police recorded 6,009 rapes of children aged under 13 years, and 6,299 rapes of children under 16 years.[11]
- Wales: In 2016–17 there were 2,845 recorded sexual offences against children under 16 years old. Police recorded 446 rapes of children aged under 13 years, and 340 rapes of children under 16 years.[11]
- Scotland: In 2016–17 there were 4,097 recorded sexual offences against children under 16 years old. Police recorded 196 rapes and attempted rapes of children aged 13–15 years, and 161 rapes and attempted rapes of children under 13 years.[11]
- Northern Ireland: In 2016–17 there were 1,875 recorded sexual offences against children and young people under 18 years old. Police recorded 360 rapes and attempted rapes of children and young people aged under 18 years.[11]
Group-based child sexual exploitation
Group-based child sexual exploitation and localised grooming are terms used to describe a series of group-based child and adolescent sexual exploitation cases in the UK,[15] of which the youngest victim was 12 and the oldest was 18.[16]
A 2013 report by the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee describes a group first making contact with the child in a public place.[17] After the group's initial contact with the child, offers of treats (takeaway food, cigarettes, drugs) persuade the child to maintain the relationship.[17] Sometimes a boy similar in age presents himself as a "boyfriend"; this person arranges for the child to be raped by other members of the group.[17] Children may end up being raped by dozens of these group members, and may be trafficked to connected groups in other towns.[17] The Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre defines "local grooming" as follows:
A television documentary was broadcast in August 2003, in which reporters uncovered details of an 18-month police and social services investigation into allegations that young British Asian men were targeting under-age girls for sex, drugs and prostitution in the West Yorkshire town of Keighley.[19] The Leeds-based Coalition for the Removal of Pimping (Crop) sought to bring this behaviour to national attention from at least 2010.[20] In November 2010, the Rotherham sex grooming case saw several convictions of child sexual abusers. In 2012, members of the Rochdale sex trafficking gang were convicted on various counts, and in 2016, following the largest child sexual exploitation investigation in the UK, "bigger than high profile cases in Rochdale and Rotherham",[21] 18 men in the Halifax child sex abuse ring case were sentenced to over 175 years in prison.[22] These cases were followed by the discovery of child sex abuse rings in Aylesbury, Banbury, Bristol, Derby, Huddersfield, Manchester, Newcastle, Oxford, Peterborough, Rochdale, Telford, and others.
These cases prompted several investigations looking into how prevalent British Asian backgrounds were in localised grooming; the first was by Quilliam in December 2017, which released a report entitled "Group Based Child Sexual Exploitation – Dissecting Grooming Gangs", which claimed 84% of offenders were of South Asian heritage.[23] However this report was criticised for its unscientific nature and poor methodology by child sexual exploitation experts Ella Cockbain and Waqas Tufail, in their paper "Failing Victims, Fuelling Hate: Challenging the Harms of the 'Muslim grooming gangs' Narrative" which was published in January 2020.[24][25]
A further investigation was carried out by the British government in December 2020, which concluded that:[26][27]
The British government originally refused to release the report but eventually did so after public pressure.[28]
In 2023, then Prime Minister Rishi Sunak stated that victims of such gangs have been overlooked due to concerns about political correctness. In contrast, Alexis Jay, who led the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham, had previously said in 2015, "I have an aversion to phrases like that", attributing the governments' inaction to "their desire to accommodate a community that would be expected to vote Labour, to not rock the boat, to keep a lid on it, to hope it would go away".[29]
This initiative followed comments by Home Secretary Suella Braverman, who stated that perpetrators in high-profile grooming gang cases are predominantly "groups of men, almost all British-Pakistani." Her remarks sparked criticism, with some accusing her of employing a "dog whistle" and perpetuating stereotypes. The Home Office clarified that her comments were based on three specific cases in Rochdale, Rotherham, and Telford.[30][31]
Reviews of the Rotherham, Rochdale, and Telford cases have identified several common factors. Offenders often worked in night-time industries like takeaways and taxis, providing access to vulnerable children.[32]
British media has been accused of perpetuating Islamophobia by "conflating the faith of Islam with criminality, such as the headlines 'Muslim sex grooming'", as well as pursuing sensationalist coverage.[33] A number of academics have described the controversy as a moral panic.[34] In one academic paper, media outlets, including The Times, The Daily Mail's Mail Online, The Guardian and The Telegraph, were accused of boosting the moral panic by creating "Folk devils" from a perceived masculine threat in young South Asian men, especially in the wake of various high profile sex abuse scandals.[35]
The Muslim Council of Britain has called on investigations to "adhere to the facts of the matter, rather than deploying deeply divisive, racially charged rhetoric that amplifies far-right narratives and demonises an entire community."[31]
Rishi Sunak has called arguments against using the term "grooming gangs" as political correctness that fails victims.[36] Other Conservative Party politicians, such as Home Secretary Suella Braverman, argue that use of the phrase "grooming gang" is simply "unfashionable facts."[31] Braverman wrote in a 2023 opinion piece that "grooming gang" members in the United Kingdom were "groups of men, almost all British-Pakistani, who hold cultural attitudes completely incompatible with British values". In response, the Independent Press Standards Organisation issued a correction stating that Braverman's article was "misleading", since it did not make it explicit that she was talking about the Rotherham, Rochdale and Telford child sexual abuse scandals in particular.[30] Many organisations called on her to withdraw her comments due to amplifying far-right ideologies.[31] Some researchers and organisations, including the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) have argued that Braverman's focusing primarily on South Asian men simply fuels "misinformation, racism and division."[37][38] NSPCC argues that "a singular focus on groups of male abusers of British-Pakistani origin draws attention away from so many other sources of harm".[38] Reporting in The Guardian stated that the term "grooming gang" is "seen by many child protection professionals as legally meaningless and tainted by racism".[38]
In 2013, BBC Inside Out London investigated allegations made by members of the Sikh community that British Sikh girls living inside Britain were being targeted by men who pretend(ed) to be Sikhs.[39] However an investigation by the Sikh scholar Katy Sian of the University of York found no truth to the allegations and instead found it was an allegation being pushed by extremist Sikh groups.[40][41] Further reports compiled by the British government and child sex exploitation scholars also confirmed there was no evidence to this.[24][42]
