Fiction seems to come naturally to you, Arclighter
Maybe you can do a bit a research and tell us when Reuters became my news source. That seems to be a bit of a delusion on your part. I have to admit...your claim is funny....but kind of sad and stupid.
If that stumps you, you can move on to providing us with the proof that Reuters is a left-wing news source. Not funny ( the joke got old fast) but still stupid.
Is all of this just something you pulled out of the air....like a piece of useless window dressing for a weak argument?
Yes, Blair denied it. I guess for you that's good enough. But given his track record on accuracy i.e. the Iraq truth fiasco...you are going to have to do better than that with me. You are going to have to corroborate this.
You might start by explaining how two British civil servants who work in the Cabinet Office were charged with releasing this memo. You might also explain how the transcripts were published by a newspaper (Daily Mirror) after confirming the legitimacy of the document. And further, you should explain why the British goverment used the Official Secrets Act to stop the newspaper from publishing the relevant excerpts.
But of course, Tony Blair said the it wasn't true. But, you know, you'd think he'd want it published if it would show it wasn't true. But I tell you, he's lucky to have people like you rely on faith rather than critical thinking.
arclighter said:
Maybe you can do a bit a research and tell us when Reuters became my news source. That seems to be a bit of a delusion on your part. I have to admit...your claim is funny....but kind of sad and stupid.
If that stumps you, you can move on to providing us with the proof that Reuters is a left-wing news source. Not funny ( the joke got old fast) but still stupid.
Is all of this just something you pulled out of the air....like a piece of useless window dressing for a weak argument?
Yes, Blair denied it. I guess for you that's good enough. But given his track record on accuracy i.e. the Iraq truth fiasco...you are going to have to do better than that with me. You are going to have to corroborate this.
You might start by explaining how two British civil servants who work in the Cabinet Office were charged with releasing this memo. You might also explain how the transcripts were published by a newspaper (Daily Mirror) after confirming the legitimacy of the document. And further, you should explain why the British goverment used the Official Secrets Act to stop the newspaper from publishing the relevant excerpts.
But of course, Tony Blair said the it wasn't true. But, you know, you'd think he'd want it published if it would show it wasn't true. But I tell you, he's lucky to have people like you rely on faith rather than critical thinking.
