Moslem Imam Preaching the usual and the norm in islamic world, HATE!!

Esco!

Banned
Nov 10, 2004
12,606
1
0
Toront Ho
papasmerf said:
Any resolution of war would have to get by both houses.
In other words probably never gonna happen since both hosues are held by Democrats.

Very interesting Papa, I learned something today :cool:
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,531
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
Esco! said:
In other words probably never gonna happen since both hosues are held by Democrats.

Very interesting Papa, I learned something today :cool:
Never is a long time

If a threat exists it could.
 

Asterix

Sr. Member
Aug 6, 2002
10,025
0
0
Blake659 said:
I mean US POLITICS......The Congress and Senate should get everything straightened out.

They have complained for years...Had all the answers...Criticized continuosuly.....While eastern Muslims gained support to eradicatre the Jews and the West.

But like I said..Everything should be alright now...The Democrats are in power....Know everything.....have the votes to do things right.

My guess..They will do nothing as usual.....oh maybe take a swing at George...tryto impeach him or somethin...but that is really to try and tarnish the Republicans..to garner support...while ignoring the growing storm to the east.

LETS WAIT AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS
As I said, I'm not sure you understand how the process works. Once troops have been committed, the President as commander-in-chief generally holds the cards. A slim majority in Congress doesn't hurt the opposition, but it isn't enough to over-ride a President determined to stay a particular course, as the immovable object George seems to be doing. The War Powers Act, first passed to curtail the actions of a renegade President, has been so watered down as to be useless. Cutting off funds for the war, the one power Congress could exercise, is a non-issue. Any attempt would be political suicide. It will take Republican defection, which seems to have begun, to truly change to the direction of this war. George won't be moved easily, if at all. Most of the clean-up for this mess will be left to the next administration, after George rides off into the sunset.

I'm reminded of a Civil War general, particularly boastful and pig-headed in his claims to being able to lead his men to victory. He liked to say his headquarters were in the saddle. After witnessing several blunders under his command, his leutenants began to comment that he had his headquarters where his hindquarters should have been. George to a "t".
 

Asterix

Sr. Member
Aug 6, 2002
10,025
0
0
papasmerf said:
Any resolution of war would have to get by both houses. That is what makes the accusations so silly.
Any President can commit troops or order strikes without congressional approval. Getting a resolution passed allowing the President to proceed is at best considered polite and politically expedient. Off hand, I can't remember anytime in the last several decades when Congress has refused a President what they wanted as far as military action, if ever. Resolutions on this are a rubber stamp. Congress was originally given the sole power to declare war, but this hasn't happened since WWII. Presidents since have simply side stepped the issue, and have pretty much done what they please without formal declaration. A matter of semantics.
 

Blake659

Banned
Mar 31, 2006
432
0
0
Blah Blah Blah

THE POINT IS..THE dEMOCRATS HAVE THE POWER....TO CORRECT THINGS...TO RIGHT ALL THE WRONGS....."CAUSE THEY HAVE ALL THE ANSWERS'

I KNOW HOW POLITICS WORKS...TOO OFTEN IT IS JUST A SHOW FOR POWER

WILL THE DEMOCRATS USE THE POWER???

THEY CERTAINLY HAVE THE VOTES TO IMPEACH HIM....BUT ITS ALWAYS EASY TO SHOUT WHEN YOU ARE IN A MINORITY...NOW THAT THEY HAVE THE VOTES.. NOT SURE THE DEMOCRATS (LIBS) HAVE THE STOMACH TO DO WHAT THEY HAVE PUSHED GEORGE TO DO FOR SO LONG!!!!!
 

Asterix

Sr. Member
Aug 6, 2002
10,025
0
0
Your usual thoughtful response. To impeach, perhaps. To convict, no way. At this point the attempt would serve no purpose, and would do nothing to get our butts out of Iraq. Enough Republicans are going to have to join Democrats to put pressure on George to begin disengaging, and the way things are going I think Republicans will fairly quickly.
 

Blake659

Banned
Mar 31, 2006
432
0
0
You make one fatal flaw...

You seem to suggeast that disengaging is the way things should go....

an opinion I agree.......But there are ANSWERS to the proplem of the growing storm in the East...I or You do no have the answers....but DISENGAGING is no one of them...In my opinion.


I would double the soldiers there....cut off all supply routes from the east.....Make sure outside influences from Iran..and Syrai to the north are stopped. Then engage the militias and disarm them.

Put weapons in the hands of a democratically elected goevernment and not every tom dick and harry that wants to run a wee war....

Also fight war with war.....Reverse the propoganda war and spread the word from the west as you and I know it is. Should we......YES....Cause you and I know the closed society with State television and radio is not seeing the truth!!! They spread LIES...YOU AND I KNOW IT....Which is the basis for the growing storm...
 

Asterix

Sr. Member
Aug 6, 2002
10,025
0
0
Double the troops? There aren't any. The reserves and National Guard have alreday been tapped to the limit. You're in fantasy land.
 

Blake659

Banned
Mar 31, 2006
432
0
0
Yes..double And Triple The Troops!!

There Are Many Many Nations In This World......many Of Whom Should Be Contributing Way More To The Troop Count...i Don't Only Speak About Americans....the Whole World Should Be Worried About The Growing Storm!!!!

i REALLY GET TIRED OF ALL THE U.S.A. BASHING WHEN THEY HELP ALL COUNTRIES...YOU AND I HELP WITH $.......WE ARE FIRST AND LOUDEST WHEN IT COMES TO AID FOR POOR COUNTRIES....BUT OTHER COUNTRIES...cANADA INCLUDED...RIDE ON THE BACK OF THE AMERICANS!!!!

IM HOPING HARPER GETS INTO THE ACT AS WELL....HE SHOULD!!!!!
 

Asterix

Sr. Member
Aug 6, 2002
10,025
0
0
The US had their chance to convince the world that invading Iraq was imperative, but when it didn't exactly take, George and Tony decided to go it alone. Reap what you sow. To expect any other country to help bail us out of this disaster now is laughable. Nobody is that stupid.
 

Blake659

Banned
Mar 31, 2006
432
0
0
But....The fact they went there is not necessarliy a mistake.

Perhaps in your mind....But the fact other countries are not yet convinced and won't join in does not make them RIGHT.


I happen to believe that appeasement, especially by Europe, will not work. Appeasement keeps the Europeans happy and avoids them from getting into a fight.....But it does not stop the fight from coming to you!!!!
 

Asterix

Sr. Member
Aug 6, 2002
10,025
0
0
So choosing not to invade another country, when the result will likely blow up in your face, is now considered appeasement? Interesting take on reality. As far as our intervention I believe the phrase is, hoisted by your own petard.
 

Blake659

Banned
Mar 31, 2006
432
0
0
No exactly

The 'blow up in your face thing"....Is called war......And I am so happy that we are trying to calm the storm.

Make no mistake.....Not invading....allowes the storm to grow.

Again. I don;t have all the answers, but the storm was / is growing......... This wee skirmish going on now is not what started the storm.

Imams long have preached hatred and beheadings to the west.....IT MUST BE STOPPED
 

LancsLad

Unstable Element
Jan 15, 2004
18,089
0
0
In a very dark place
XTORONTO said:
is this a canadian ora american site, there is a difference..



Love your signature line.

Didn't know you cared.

Please register at the front desk so we know where to find you, it's just easier that way.:)
 

Esco!

Banned
Nov 10, 2004
12,606
1
0
Toront Ho
LancsLad said:
Love your signature line.

Didn't know you cared.

Please register at the front desk so we know where to find you, it's just easier that way
Leave the bloke alone, he's obviously American and as such is highly confused!! :eek:
 

Blake659

Banned
Mar 31, 2006
432
0
0
I take exception to that Esco.

Who are you to talk down to someone.....You have no idea who Lansclad is....But I always find it interesting how the liberal left democrats are always good at criticizing.....War, Bush, Americans, Harper....Anyhting that someone else does.....and they don't like...CRITICIZE IT!!!!!......but really never have much thought go into their own solutions...Come to think of it....libs are more into..."Live and let live"......Which of course is all good until the western way of life is dramatically changed....And then we'll see who the liberals are upset at.


As we know..Its the libs who like all the toys...the excess....and of course the big cars etc etc.....

I hope the storm does not crash on the libs.........
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts