More lies from the loser ex President at his arizona rally- seek help donny before they lock you away

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,643
60,774
113
https://www.lincolninstitute.org/voting-irregularities-in-the-2020-election-both-sides-are-wrong/ [for Georgia]


https://redstate.com/stu-in-sd/2021...lection-irregularities-in-many-states-n343947 [scroll to observation section]




Exactly.
Look how weak this all is.

You have articles from early last year with no follow up.
You have the Kemp memo of "36 inconsistencies" that total a few hundred votes (and which look like identifiable errors of data entry) and them trying to spin it as proof of massive fraud.
Presenting the court record in a skewed manner.
These are comically weak.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,806
22,230
113
Their idea of "statistical anomalies" is basically the author pointing out a bunch of stuff and then saying "I mean, come on, what are the odds?"
They also seem unable to look at the evidence, check to see if its legit or even what the accusation is exactly.
Instead they just do a Rudy and say, 'see, I saw this on FB so it must be true! Look how many entries!'
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,643
60,774
113
Their idea of "statistical anomalies" is basically the author pointing out a bunch of stuff and then saying "I mean, come on, what are the odds?"
Well yes.
They are also just really dumb examples.

Losing "bellwether" states as if those don't change over time anyway.
The frankly idiotic prediction model that judges general election success by how much you win in your primaries. (This was the model that predicted something like 400 electoral college votes for Trump.)
Got less votes in a bunch of counties but more votes overall as if population change over time isn't a thing.

They are just nonsense if you stop and think for more than 3 seconds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anonemouse

seagerbuzz

Well-known member
Sep 27, 2020
1,335
446
83
The Donald is a quintessential bully/coward and anti vaxxers are mostly loud mouthed chickens. It's a fit, except it's HIS vaccine, right?
As usual labeling people without knowledge. Forcing vaccines on people is a bully tactic. Blaming the unvaxxed for a shitty healthcare system is what cowards do.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
As usual labeling people without knowledge. Forcing vaccines on people is a bully tactic. Blaming the unvaxxed for a shitty healthcare system is what cowards do.
It is called public safety. I suppose speed limits are also a bully tactic. Ans it is mostly the unvaxced who are taking up hospital beds and taking them away from people who have medical problems not of their own making.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
https://www.lincolninstitute.org/voting-irregularities-in-the-2020-election-both-sides-are-wrong/ [for Georgia]


https://redstate.com/stu-in-sd/2021...lection-irregularities-in-many-states-n343947 [scroll to observation section]




LOL. Gee of only the SCOTUS had you doing their research. Too funny and really kind of pathetic and desperate.
 

seagerbuzz

Well-known member
Sep 27, 2020
1,335
446
83
It is called public safety. I suppose speed limits are also a bully tactic. Ans it is mostly the unvaxced who are taking up hospital beds and taking them away from people who have medical problems not of their own making.
Here we go. The old speed limit drunk driving wearing a seat belt or bulletproof vest comeback. It's getting old and stale. It's not the same.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
Here we go. The old speed limit drunk driving wearing a seat belt or bulletproof vest comeback. It's getting old and stale. It's not the same.
LOL. How is not get vaccinated during a pandemic not a matter of public safety? Something is not old or less valid just because you say so. Why not tell us the distinction.
 

seagerbuzz

Well-known member
Sep 27, 2020
1,335
446
83
LOL. How is not get vaccinated during a pandemic not a matter of public safety? Something is not old or less valid just because you say so. Why not tell us the distinction.
A vaccine is suppose to prevent infection. If you are vaccinated then you are protected so you are of no harm to others.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whitehill_21

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
19,047
5,429
113
Lewiston, NY

fall

Well-known member
Dec 9, 2010
2,740
679
113
Game, set and match.
And complete lack of logic. If vaccination prevents infection, the only people who can get hurt by someone who decided not to get accinated are the people who do not get vaccinated. Now, surely, with 40% prortection rate against Omicron, it is a different story. We had 2 years to build more hospitals and train doctors (jusy open immigration for doctors and have them take our exams). But no, JT prefers to through money to buy votes and cause labour shortage.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,806
22,230
113
And complete lack of logic. If vaccination prevents infection, the only people who can get hurt by someone who decided not to get accinated are the people who do not get vaccinated. Now, surely, with 40% prortection rate against Omicron, it is a different story. We had 2 years to build more hospitals and train doctors (jusy open immigration for doctors and have them take our exams). But no, JT prefers to through money to buy votes and cause labour shortage.
Kinda like seat belts, fall.

The only people who get hurt are those who don't wear seatbelts and end up flying through their windshields when they are in a car accident.
The question is, as a society, do we want to pay the hospital bills of those who won't wear seat belts or get the vaccine?
 
Toronto Escorts