Ashley Madison

More lies from the loser ex President at his arizona rally- seek help donny before they lock you away

fall

Well-known member
Dec 9, 2010
2,740
679
113
He probably could, as level of frustration with current administration is quite high. However, we all know
who are the democrats - cheats, criminals and demagogs, seeing how they clever conned the whole country
in 2020, I have little faith for 2024
He could, but it would be a bad move for Republicans. The only way Biden can win next time if he will be against Trump as some middle voters may be scared. Anyone but Trump, and Biden will have no chance. Like when Trump won: anyone but Hillary could have beat him. It seems both parties compete in who can nominate the worst candidate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leimonis

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
40,625
7,889
113
The Deplorables are Donato's toilet paper.

If you give people enough shit, they will eat it. I couldn't get to the convenience store due to the overflowing line-up of cars at Tim's, people love Biebs turdlets.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
yeah man, working on it...you see ? growing :) Well, I despise most of the politicians (from both parties) but talking
about the democrats they are special case. That is a party of slavery, Jim Crow and segregation. Talking about GOP,
they just mostly don't care and do nothing.
LOL. Why not provide just one instance of the Dems having cheated in the last election.
 

whitehill_21

Active member
May 23, 2007
515
108
43
LOL. Why not provide just one instance of the Dems having cheated in the last election.
the problem is that many folks here wouldn't accept anything presented

there is this nice site describing irregularities during election https://hereistheevidence.com/

there are many fronts that dems acted to tip the scale into their favour: suppressing some information about the candidates,
changing rules, ignoring and harassing legislators, restricting and/or booting observers from the voting stations, using 3rd parties (like FB financing [~500mil]. and other shit.
 

Fun For All

Well-known member
Feb 9, 2014
11,668
5,911
113
the problem is that many folks here wouldn't accept anything presented

there is this nice site describing irregularities during election https://hereistheevidence.com/

there are many fronts that dems acted to tip the scale into their favour: suppressing some information about the candidates,
changing rules, ignoring and harassing legislators, restricting and/or booting observers from the voting stations, using 3rd parties (like FB financing [~500mil]. and other shit.
The only thing that tipped the election in the Democrats favour is they got more votes...
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
34,258
64,980
113
the problem is that many folks here wouldn't accept anything presented

there is this nice site describing irregularities during election https://hereistheevidence.com/

there are many fronts that dems acted to tip the scale into their favour: suppressing some information about the candidates,
changing rules, ignoring and harassing legislators, restricting and/or booting observers from the voting stations, using 3rd parties (like FB financing [~500mil]. and other shit.
So if this is what you're worried about, you support the Federal voting rights bill to protect against this sort of manipulation, right?
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
34,258
64,980
113
TBH, I don't know what is in this bill exactly, catchy name though
So how about you look into the bill and decide whether or not it is something you support.
Or even has pieces (like voter ID) that you support.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,730
23,998
113
CBC is openly funded by the government, hope it's not a surprise for you
so what are the chances they voice any critique against the ruling party
and their leader ?
They do post negative articles about the party in power. Libs, cons and ndp all have articles on them.
If the CBC was critical of only one party they wouldn't have lasted this long.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
the problem is that many folks here wouldn't accept anything presented

there is this nice site describing irregularities during election https://hereistheevidence.com/

there are many fronts that dems acted to tip the scale into their favour: suppressing some information about the candidates,
changing rules, ignoring and harassing legislators, restricting and/or booting observers from the voting stations, using 3rd parties (like FB financing [~500mil]. and other shit.
So in other words you are unable to provide even one.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,730
23,998
113
This site is about as useful as citing VAERS uncritically.
That site lists all of the nonsense that Rudy and his team brought to court 60 times.
Its a list of failed claims, total bullshit and likely the facebook post that Rudy used to initially claim there was electoral fraud.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,730
23,998
113
Ok, here you go...hahaha...you asked for it.

But wait, I just read this.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
34,258
64,980
113
Doesn't start well.
First paragraph is "Statistical anomalies" and has the following

For instance, he lost 18 out of 19 bellwether counties, failed to take any of the 27 toss-up Congressional seats, and overcame Trump’s incumbent advantage of winning 94% of the primary votes.
-- none of which are statistical anomalies.

Looking further, it doesn't get much better than that.
Lots of innuendo, designed to raise "clouds" and "shadows".

It's a remarkably shallow site for one that is pretending to be investigative.
 

Fun For All

Well-known member
Feb 9, 2014
11,668
5,911
113

whitehill_21

Active member
May 23, 2007
515
108
43
Doesn't start well.
First paragraph is "Statistical anomalies" and has the following



-- none of which are statistical anomalies.

Looking further, it doesn't get much better than that.
Lots of innuendo, designed to raise "clouds" and "shadows".

It's a remarkably shallow site for one that is pretending to be investigative.
https://www.lincolninstitute.org/voting-irregularities-in-the-2020-election-both-sides-are-wrong/ [for Georgia]


https://redstate.com/stu-in-sd/2021...lection-irregularities-in-many-states-n343947 [scroll to observation section]




 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts