Wilful ignorance? Inability to keep up with the news? Relying only on social media for serious information?They did skip steps however......There was no peer reviewed human trials.
What type of mindset does it take to acknowledge that?
For example.
Pfizer and BioNTech Conclude Phase 3 Study of COVID-19 Vaccine Candidate, Meeting All Primary Efficacy Endpoints | Pfizer
Primary efficacy analysis demonstrates BNT162b2 to be 95% effective against COVID-19 beginning 28 days after the first dose; 170 confirmed cases of COVID-19 were evaluated, with 162 observed in the placebo group versus 8 in the vaccine group Efficacy was consistent across age, gender, race and...
NEJM releases ‘impressive’ peer-reviewed data for Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine candidate | AHA News
Peer-reviewed data for Pfizer Inc.’s BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine candidate was published by the New England Journal of Medicine, confirming its safety and efficacy.
There is this discussion too on this meme that peer reviews were not done.Peer-reviewed data for Pfizer Inc.’s BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine candidate was published today by the New England Journal of Medicine, confirming its safety and efficacy.
The study’s authors concluded that a two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against COVID-19 in individuals 16 years of age or older, with safety over a median of two months similar to that of other viral vaccines.
In an editorial accompanying the draft abstract, a team of NEJM editors called the data “impressive,” with a “remarkable level of safety and efficacy,” writing, “What appears to be a dramatic success for vaccination holds the promise of saving uncounted lives and giving us a pathway out of what has been a global disaster.”
COVID-19 Vaccine Data Was Peer-Reviewed, Contrary to Meme's Claim - FactCheck.org
The COVID-19 vaccines have been the subject of peer-reviewed studies that found they were effective and safe, but a meme has been circulating on social media falsely claiming that no such studies have been conducted.








