Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 hijacked, official says

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0
I am starting to doubt anything and everything we have been told: there seems to be no reliable evidence of anything.
Certainly from Malaysia - they have consistently shot themselves in the foot.

How the Devil do you confuse "Goodnight, Malaysia three-seven-zero" for "Alright Goodnight" and then keep repeating the later for three weeks!
 

BlueLaser

New member
Jan 28, 2014
1,023
0
0
I am starting to doubt anything and everything we have been told: there seems to be no reliable evidence of anything.

How reliable is that evidence from the satellite?

The situation begins to fit the words that Winston Churchill used to describe the Russians (unrelated to MH370!): "It is a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma."

I expect that if we ever find an answer, it is going to be something pretty weird! Something like maybe the plane was hijacked to North Korea?

Perry
I've always been taught that aviation satellite reports can carry up to a 5 hour lag. So, I'm not sure how reliable it is. I assume that data is time-stamped though. I mean, how else could they calculate a position if it wasn't? But since they aren't releasing any details, it's pretty hard to know how concrete anything is.
 
S

**Sophie**

Latest Update: 2 New Pings detected!!

Looks like they have found the final resting place of MH370, in the northern part the southern Indian Ocean. Still wondering why there was no debris field, and if it went down and did not explode how could that possibly be? Is it possible not to crash into the ocean, and have the plane stay in tact while it sinks?
 

IM469

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2012
11,139
2,469
113
Latest Update: 2 New Pings detected!!

Looks like they have found the final resting place of MH370, in the northern part the southern Indian Ocean. Still wondering why there was no debris field, and if it went down and did not explode how could that possibly be? Is it possible not to crash into the ocean, and have the plane stay in tact while it sinks?
Low altitude and an attempt for a water landing that failed ? No one got out but the plane is still largely intact ? A lot of questions could be answered if they finally find it.
 

BlueLaser

New member
Jan 28, 2014
1,023
0
0
Low altitude and an attempt for a water landing that failed ? No one got out but the plane is still largely intact ? A lot of questions could be answered if they finally find it.
A largely-intact plane is one of the two most likely reasons for no debris. A nose-dive is another possibility. Alien abduction still isn't off the table.
 

superstar_88

The Chiseler
Jan 4, 2008
5,544
1,123
113
Alien abduction with them spitting out the black box before departing.
 

Perry Mason

Well-known member
Aug 20, 2001
4,682
208
63
Here
Or abduction, do what they need to do, then teleport the whole thing to the bottom of the ocean. It's really the simplest explanation.
Coming to you directly from The Twilight Zone!

da-da-da-da da-da-da-da...
:alien:

[So my post #26, above, finally persuaded you? :Eek:]

Perry
 

TeasePlease

Cockasian Brother
Aug 3, 2010
7,738
5
38
If the plane glided intact they would have attempted an evacuation.

I'm going with alien abduction.
 

BlueLaser

New member
Jan 28, 2014
1,023
0
0
If the plane glided intact they would have attempted an evacuation.

I'm going with alien abduction.
Not necessarily. I can't remember the details off the top of my head, but there was a flight that landed somewhere with a fire, and everyone burned to death with the aircraft because no one evacuated. It's strange, but this kind of thing does happen. I don't know what the sea state was at the time either though. I do know that the Indian Ocean can be pretty inhospitable at times, so is it possible the state was so bad that an evacuation wouldn't leave any trace? Maybe in a few months bodies will wash up on the shores of Brazil.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,498
4,903
113
Not necessarily. I can't remember the details off the top of my head, but there was a flight that landed somewhere with a fire, and everyone burned to death with the aircraft because no one evacuated. It's strange, but this kind of thing does happen. I don't know what the sea state was at the time either though. I do know that the Indian Ocean can be pretty inhospitable at times, so is it possible the state was so bad that an evacuation wouldn't leave any trace? Maybe in a few months bodies will wash up on the shores of Brazil.
I would imagine that the waves in the southern Indian ocean always are so great that a soft landing will be impossible.
 

Keebler Elf

The Original Elf
Aug 31, 2001
14,618
239
63
The Keebler Factory
It is virtually impossible to land a jetliner in the ocean. Maybe if you're right near the beach but out on the open seas... good luck.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Here is a an explanation for no debris: in the month they spent looking in the wrong place the debris mostly sunk in the rough seas and storms, and what didn't is widely dispersed in a big ocean.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,490
1,359
113
The next step with the pingers is pretty cool. They are going to drop 84 sonobuoys in a giant field with microphones at 1000m and let them drift over the area and use signal differentiation to try and get a fix on the location. Still, with thermal layers and depth of 4500 I doubt they will be able to get a lot more precise. I wonder how they found it. I suspect it was with seismic microphones which is how the found the USS Scorpion
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,689
2,587
113
Here is a an explanation for no debris: in the month they spent looking in the wrong place the debris mostly sunk in the rough seas and storms, and what didn't is widely dispersed in a big ocean.
That's what I was thinking, in the true sense of looking for a needle in a haystack.
 

BlueLaser

New member
Jan 28, 2014
1,023
0
0
The next step with the pingers is pretty cool. They are going to drop 84 sonobuoys in a giant field with microphones at 1000m and let them drift over the area and use signal differentiation to try and get a fix on the location. Still, with thermal layers and depth of 4500 I doubt they will be able to get a lot more precise. I wonder how they found it. I suspect it was with seismic microphones which is how the found the USS Scorpion
At this point, it's a wing and a prayer. Batteries are probably dead by now. They'd be better off doing sonar traces of the ocean bed looking for the fuselage.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,490
1,359
113
At this point, it's a wing and a prayer. Batteries are probably dead by now. They'd be better off doing sonar traces of the ocean bed looking for the fuselage.
They will try this first because it will take 6 weeks to 2 months to map the current area based on the pings they have . As the pings fade, locating them will be even more defintive for finding the wreck
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,359
11
38
Here is a an explanation for no debris: in the month they spent looking in the wrong place the debris mostly sunk in the rough seas and storms, and what didn't is widely dispersed in a big ocean.
Totally agree. Water-logged too if anything was capable of floating at first.
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,359
11
38
It is virtually impossible to land a jetliner in the ocean. Maybe if you're right near the beach but out on the open seas... good luck.
Especially in those rough waters but if really lucky and calm, a distinct possibility but it wouldn't float for long that's for sure.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts