"There's an old truism, in that "the strongest points in a debate are not found in the ones that are addressed, but in the ones that are ignored. ""oy vey
"There's an old truism, in that "the strongest points in a debate are not found in the ones that are addressed, but in the ones that are ignored. ""oy vey
So, you think Comey helped Hillary? That is some pretty interesting gaslighting...especially since he announced a continued investigation a week or two before the election. You're telling me that didn't help Trump? Like, in a major way??? And what did Strzok or McCabe do that was warranted a prosecution? Are you telling me Durham didn't have the balls to do it, or that there was no evidence? Very interesting how that works out. As for this article...the "apparent" double standard? Please, spare us the outrage. There is a world of difference between what they did, and you know that. But flood the zone with shit to smear everyone. I'm pretty sure Hillary didn't sell classified intel. I cannot make the same statement regarding Trump. I mean, yes, there is a chance he didn't...but at the same time, it is interesting how so many CIA assets died shortly after he left office...The FBI lawer who doctored the FISA application "evedence" was convicted and received a slap on the wrist. Sussman, Strzok, McCabe, Comey and others all walked. So, don't tell me it's bullshit. Here's a contrast for you how things are really done in DC when you're on the right side of politics.
Unpacking the Apparent Trump-Hillary Double Standard: For Her, the FBI Helped Obstruct Its Own Investigation
By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigationsSeptember 15, 2022 Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch obtained evidence that a computer contractor working under the direction of Hillary Clinton’s legawww.realclearinvestigations.com
Of course Comey saved Hillary. You got to be a moron to "forget" that. So, what's the point of having this conversation? Here's the blast from the pastSo, you think Comey helped Hillary? That is some pretty interesting gaslighting...especially since he announced a continued investigation a week or two before the election. You're telling me that didn't help Trump? Like, in a major way??? And what did Strzok or McCabe do that was warranted a prosecution? Are you telling me Durham didn't have the balls to do it, or that there was no evidence? Very interesting how that works out. As for this article...the "apparent" double standard? Please, spare us the outrage. There is a world of difference between what they did, and you know that. But flood the zone with shit to smear everyone. I'm pretty sure Hillary didn't sell classified intel. I cannot make the same statement regarding Trump. I mean, yes, there is a chance he didn't...but at the same time, it is interesting how so many CIA assets died shortly after he left office...
The word "reveal" is wrong there, but crafting that narrative shield is what he's being paid for, yes.He is not going to reveal anything beyond of what we already know: the Russia circus was a hoax from beginning to end. Just as I said all along. ROTFLMFAO!
Didn't he get one plea deal on something minor?However, Durham couldn't convict anyone,
It's an article of faith among the congregation.So, you think Comey helped Hillary?
Comey helped rump get elected.Of course Comey saved Hillary. You got to be a moron to "forget" that. So, what's the point of having this conversation? Here's the blast from the past
Charles Krauthammer: Why did FBI Director James Comey let Hillary Clinton off the hook?
Comey summed up Clinton's behaviour as "extremely careless." How is that not gross negligence?nationalpost.com
BTW, which secrets Trump sold and to whom?
LOL. So, Comey saved Hillary? Right. Keep drinking the Kool-Aid. The reality here is, just because he laid out a case doesn't mean it would hold up in court. And that could be the same thing for Trump. Now, as to your other question, did I say he sold secrets? I said there is the possibility that he did. At the very least, there is a very strong chance that people without the right clearance likely saw these top secret documents, possibly people from foreign governments....We don't know. But are you telling me this doesn't stink? For all the sins of Clinton, these allegations are significantly more serious. I know you wanna play the whataboutism game, but this isn't comparing apples to apples.Of course Comey saved Hillary. You got to be a moron to "forget" that. So, what's the point of having this conversation? Here's the blast from the past
Charles Krauthammer: Why did FBI Director James Comey let Hillary Clinton off the hook?
Comey summed up Clinton's behaviour as "extremely careless." How is that not gross negligence?nationalpost.com
BTW, which secrets Trump sold and to whom?
It wasn't his call to make determination whether the case had legs or not.LOL. So, Comey saved Hillary? Right. Keep drinking the Kool-Aid. The reality here is, just because he laid out a case doesn't mean it would hold up in court. And that could be the same thing for Trump. Now, as to your other question, did I say he sold secrets? I said there is the possibility that he did. At the very least, there is a very strong chance that people without the right clearance likely saw these top secret documents, possibly people from foreign governments....We don't know. But are you telling me this doesn't stink? For all the sins of Clinton, these allegations are significantly more serious. I know you wanna play the whataboutism game, but this isn't comparing apples to apples.
We know, you think its up to the POTUS to decide who gets investigated and charged.It wasn't his call to make determination whether the case had legs or not.
Really, whom did Trump's DOJ raid?We know, you think its up to the POTUS to decide who gets investigated and charged.
Like Putin, this is the GOP way.
There was no coup. The Steele Dossier is and always was bullshit, paid for by Hillary, Alfa Bank story was fake news, the Piss Tape does not exist... I'm tired of writing the same thing over, and over again when you people fail to offer anything of substance.Omg… JCP has one sided malicious website to write stuff…. It all must be true.
Btw… Trump attempted a Coup, had minions attack the Capitol to stop the certification of an election, and is currently in hot water for stealing top secret documents.
What you call a set up, was simply someone telling Steele his evidence was first hand, when really it was 2nd hand info. It has never been proven false though.
I will let you get back to play time now.
Fucking hot air.com.
Be tired. The dossier was real. It does not matter who paid. It had problems with evidence and sources, and we take those into consideration. Truthfully, Trump paid people to dig up dirt on his opponents. Common practice. You are taking some true info and jumping to a conclusion that it was a giant hoax. The evidence does not support that… neither do all the convictions that Trump associates received.There was no coup. The Steele Dossier is and always was bullshit, paid for by Hillary, Alfa Bank story was fake news, the Piss Tape does not exist... I'm tired of writing the same thing over, and over again when you people fail to offer anything of substance.
There was no coup. The Steele Dossier is and always was bullshit, paid for by Hillary, Alfa Bank story was fake news, the Piss Tape does not exist... I'm tired of writing the same thing over, and over again when you people fail to offer anything of substance.
They aren't 'Trump's' DOJ or FBI.The FBI is the DOJ. Did they raid themselves?
Except for testimony and texts from Cohen, of course.No clue about the piss tape. I have seen no evidence myself.
ROTFLMFAO!! The President cannot steal "top secret" documents as the security classifications do not apply to him. As for selling them, that's just another conspiracy theory like the rest of your post. Just more TDS.Be tired. The dossier was real. It does not matter who paid. It had problems with evidence and sources, and we take those into consideration. Truthfully, Trump paid people to dig up dirt on his opponents. Common practice. You are taking some true info and jumping to a conclusion that it was a giant hoax. The evidence does not support that… neither do all the convictions that Trump associates received.
Alfa Bank was not fake. You simply have web site sources (conservative) that try to paint it different. Go figure.
There was Coup. I watched it on TV. It’s being investigated as we speak.
I would have been willing to buy it as a grass roots movement, but fake electors, and a hand full of Senators refusing to certify the election that had ties to Trump… Besides, Bannon already told us what the plan was, and they needed Pence to play his part. That ship has sailed.
He stole top secret information. I bet it would very valuable to foreign buyers.
You can wear blinders, but the rest of us understand a grifter when we see one. The fact that you can’t explains a lot. Lol.
I never accused the President of selling off classified info. Joe Biden is currently the President. Donald Trump is now a private citizen. He broke the law. And did’t even put a fucking pad lock on the door… lol.ROTFLMFAO!! The President cannot steal "top secret" documents as the security classifications do not apply to him. As for selling them, that's just another conspiracy theory like the rest of your post. Just more TDS.