LOL! Oh, what a web...

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,643
60,774
113
Oh no!
The FBI paid someone!
Obviously it was to enable the cover up!!!

There is no other possible explanation!

That's why I'm not charging any of that!
 

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
19,047
5,429
113
Lewiston, NY
Had to look at this Hot Air source. Couldn't be more aptly named. Still pushing the no collusion lie, no smoking gun (yet - things continue to unravel) so nothing happened. One other article caught my eye, teeing of on the French for having a new energy plan. Apparently a part of the plan to deal with severe electrical disruptions is to have contingency plans to cooperate with GB and the rest of Europe. Righties hate that kind of cooperation - take Nazis as an extreme example...
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
Don't worry, any day now Durham will finally reveal all.
He is not going to reveal anything beyond of what we already know: the Russia circus was a hoax from beginning to end. Just as I said all along. ROTFLMFAO!
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,806
22,230
113
He is not going to reveal anything beyond of what we already know: the Russia circus was a hoax from beginning to end. Just as I said all along. ROTFLMFAO!
And Clinton will be locked up finally?
Will Steele go to jail?

OMG, you are a such a mark.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,806
22,230
113
Try to stay on topic.
The topic is that the DOJ investigations are about fraud, an attempted coup, electoral fuckery, stealing national secrets and abuse of power.
The comparison to the Durham investigation shows how grounded in fantasy the right wing, and your, claims are in comparison.

totally on topic
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
The topic is that the DOJ investigations are about fraud, an attempted coup, electoral fuckery, stealing national secrets and abuse of power.
The comparison to the Durham investigation shows how grounded in fantasy the right wing, and your, claims are in comparison.

totally on topic
oy vey
 

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,316
5,390
113

So, the Durham investigation found little evidence of any wrong doing in the perfectly reasonable and legitimate Mueller investigation. Mueller found evidence that Russia supported Trump, Trump's campaign wanted to coordinate with Russia but was too incompetent to do so, and that it was a serious matter. If the sitting president at the time didn't obstruct justice, or his Attorney General didn't cover his ass, we might have gotten answers on some serious questions.

However, Durham couldn't convict anyone, and the upcoming Danchenko case will likely fall apart. Sort of shows you that no matter how much the QOP wants to pretend the thing was a witch hunt, there is no basis to back that up. Well, except the fuck your feelings crowd really feels like it was a witch hunt....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
You

So, the Durham investigation found little evidence of any wrong doing in the perfectly reasonable and legitimate Mueller investigation. Mueller found evidence that Russia supported Trump, Trump's campaign wanted to coordinate with Russia but was too incompetent to do so, and that it was a serious matter. If the sitting president at the time didn't obstruct justice, or his Attorney General didn't cover his ass, we might have gotten answers on some serious questions.

However, Durham couldn't convict anyone, and the upcoming Danchenko case will likely fall apart. Sort of shows you that no matter how much the QOP wants to pretend the thing was a witch hunt, there is no basis to back that up. Well, except the fuck your feelings crowd really feels like it was a witch hunt....
cannot convict anyone in DC who's on the "right" side of the Beltway grift. What the revelations, from all sources, showed that there was no basis for any kind of investigation.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,806
22,230
113

So, the Durham investigation found little evidence of any wrong doing in the perfectly reasonable and legitimate Mueller investigation. Mueller found evidence that Russia supported Trump, Trump's campaign wanted to coordinate with Russia but was too incompetent to do so, and that it was a serious matter. If the sitting president at the time didn't obstruct justice, or his Attorney General didn't cover his ass, we might have gotten answers on some serious questions.

However, Durham couldn't convict anyone, and the upcoming Danchenko case will likely fall apart. Sort of shows you that no matter how much the QOP wants to pretend the thing was a witch hunt, there is no basis to back that up. Well, except the fuck your feelings crowd really feels like it was a witch hunt....
Not only that, but trump's own choice for the DNI thought Putin must have dirt on him.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,316
5,390
113
You
cannot convict anyone in DC who's on the "right" side of the Beltway grift. What the revelations, from all sources, showed that there was no basis for any kind of investigation.
Yeah, but Durham persisted anyways.

Oh, wait, you meant Mueller....well, I think considering what spurred the initial investigation and all the things they discovered along the way sort of shows you are wrong. And continuing to lie about it isn't going to chance the facts. I mean, a GOP led committee said it found evidence of Russian interference...


But why let facts get in the way of GOP bullshit....

EDIT: Also, about the inability to convict someone...That's just bullshit. If there was actual evidence and a strong case, that lawyer would have been convicted. Durham just didn't have a strong enough case. I mean, would you say Kyle Rittenhouse is a free man because of the venue of his murder trial?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
Yeah, but Durham persisted anyways.

Oh, wait, you meant Mueller....well, I think considering what spurred the initial investigation and all the things they discovered along the way sort of shows you are wrong. And continuing to lie about it isn't going to chance the facts. I mean, a GOP led committee said it found evidence of Russian interference...


But why let facts get in the way of GOP bullshit....

EDIT: Also, about the inability to convict someone...That's just bullshit. If there was actual evidence and a strong case, that lawyer would have been convicted. Durham just didn't have a strong enough case. I mean, would you say Kyle Rittenhouse is a free man because of the venue of his murder trial?
The FBI lawer who doctored the FISA application "evedence" was convicted and received a slap on the wrist. Sussman, Strzok, McCabe, Comey and others all walked. So, don't tell me it's bullshit. Here's a contrast for you how things are really done in DC when you're on the right side of politics.

 
Toronto Escorts