Let's see how subjective beauty is...

[onomatopoeia]

I doubt that consensus would be the same or would hold across different races or cultures (for a given girl).

They don't vote in TERB polls.

A 'Hot' score is not measured empirically; it's a collective opinion, averaged. I think Natalia is a 6, and most people here think that she's around that range.

 

[onomatopoeia]

While I wouldn't have used the IQ score as an example, that it is a normal distribution seems a perfectly reasonable way to do it.

Of course, that distribution is going to different for everyone, since there is a large amount of idiosyncratic valuation in terms of physical beauty.
Which means I would say that everyone's curve is going to have a slightly different standard deviation as well, probably. You've got 5 as average and one standard deviation going out to 3-7, like in the graph and then being wider at the edges, going all the way out to 1-9 to cover 2 SDs. I think some people might have a much tighter one, with one SD going from 4-6, or one similar to yours at the beginning and then a harsher drop off.

I also think you can make an argument that it isn't a normal distribution, but that it might be skewed in one direction or another. (I'd be very curious if anyone's done studies on how people actually classify people in the real world. I'm sure someone has.)

Valcazar, I only used the IQ model for the benefit of illustrating a bell curve. The shape of that particular curve is not meant to conform with the 1-10 scale. It's just meant to illustrate that Drop Dead Gorgeous and Triple Baggers are quite rare, and the vast majority are in the 3.5-6.5 range.

 

[Valcazar]

Valcazar, I only used the IQ model for the benefit of illustrating a bell curve. The shape of that particular curve is not meant to conform with the 1-10 scale. It's just meant to illustrate that Drop Dead Gorgeous and Triple Baggers are quite rare, and the vast majority are in the 3.5-6.5 range.

Just saying that since IQ is so famously controversial, it seems a bad example when you can find normal distributions anywhere.

And my point remains - if it is normal, everyone is going to have a different looking distribution and that there is a strong chance it isn't a normal distribution at all.

 

[shack]

Face wise 5.9 I need ot see the whole package or body. And I have check and I drop it to 4.5.

She's really skinny.

 

[LTO_3]

Let's not complicate the OP's simple question. On the 1-10 scale we all know that 1 is the least attractive, 10 is most attractive and 5 is middle of the road/average looking, where we don't need a breakdown of her beauty or attractiveness for each of the numbers on the 1-10 scale.
I find her okay looking at best and not much better than that. I'd give her 5.5 if I could, so I'll generously round it up to a 6.

LTO_3

 

[Gstep]

Some of these ratings are whack. Sure, she has a very square jaw which can make her look more masculine and less attractive from certain angles. And smaller lips, which used to be seen as more attractive but now not so much thanks to the rise and normalization of fish lips
Stupid botox and fillers!

But generally speaking I feels she's more attractive than the vast majority of female's out there. Also I'm not a big fan of her character and I think prople might also be using that against her as an unconscious bais. Personally, I like her look and I'd give her at least a 7 and maybe even an 8 when you consider that nice spinner body of hers...

 

[Goodoer]

Anything beyond general health and symmetry and it is a crap shoot.

We all can be unimpressed by another man's dream girl. You see women that you know would be deemed models, but they do nothing for you... Pretty eyes, a nice smile and a great attitude go most of the way. You can find desirable traits in anyone.

 

[Insidious Von]

Natalia Dyer is a lovely girl but her character is bland, she's not charismatic like Sadie Sink nor as sexy as Maya Hawk (who's 80% of her mother Uma Thurman). Not sure where her character arc goes in the finale.

Btw have you checked out Steve Harrington's (Joe Keery) first gf on Stranger Things? She's currently in Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery.

 

[oil&gas]

I guess we need to define what each number on the scale means.

For me…
1 - 3 is the ugly zone. Think “throw Momma from the train”.

Regrettably I've never made love to a lady in that zone. I was
once told facially unattractive women are good in bed.

4 - 6 is the run of the mill avg looking girl. No shame in this zone. After all, by definition, most people are avg.

7 - 9 is good looking to fucking hot.

10. Unicorn beauty. The kind of girl in magazines that has been air brushed and photoshopped. She does not exist, (and if she did, you could not afford her.) (yes, even you!)

 

[unassuming]

IMO, this is a 10

 

[Butler1000]

Charisma counts. I've known some girls that were quite beautiful but not "hot". And some 6's that for some reason you really really wanted to fuck.

In this case however she is good girl GND and reliant on youth for any sexiness. Within ten years she will either be out or regulated to supporting and small roles.

 

[Valcazar]

Charisma counts. I've known some girls that were quite beautiful but not "hot". And some 6's that for some reason you really really wanted to fuck.

But that's a separate question from what the OP wants to ask.
I agree that I don't think they are really that separable - charisma can modify what traits you even find attractive.

There is also the illusion that "hotter people are more likely to be assholes" that probably gets mixed in there.