Labour to cut welfare spending ‘by billions’ – what changes could they make?

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
14,345
2,378
113
Ghawar
06 March 2025

Labour is planning billions in welfare spending cuts as part of Rachel Reeves’ upcoming spring statement, new reports have suggested.

The chancellor will be announcing her plans for the government’s finances on 26 March, with a raft of multi-department cuts floated.

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is expected to bear the brunt of these, with as much as £5bn reportedly to be earmarked for savings.

Estimates of exactly how much Ms Reeves is looking to pull back from government receipts have only increased in recent months.

Treasury insiders have indicated that the £9.9bn fiscal headroom left after Labour’s October Budget has been severely reduced, with one telling the BBC that “the world has changed” since then.

The subsequent months have seen the economy essentially flatline, while borrowing costs have risen and mass uncertainty takes hold amid tensions around the US and Ukraine.

A Treasury source also told The Independent that taking action on welfare “is something we would need to do” regardless, given the rising welfare bill. Spending on health-related benefits rose to £65bn last year, up 25 per cent from the year before the Covid pandemic. This is forecast to rise to £100bn before the next election.

Ministers have shared their ambition to reduce this figure, with justice secretary Shabana Mahmood saying on Wednesday: "There's a moral case here for making sure that people who can work are able to work and there's a practical point here as well, because our current situation is unsustainable."

However, a group of leading charities including the Joseph Rowntree Foundation and Z2K have written to DWP secretary Liz Kendall asking that any planned changes are made after meaningful consultation with those who are likely to be affected.

Here are the key changes that Labour could announce on 26 March:

Work capability assessment overhaul

Changes to the work capability assessment are likely central to Labour’s plans to cut welfare spending, with a plan to “reform” the measure confirmed in the party’s manifesto.

Ministers are understood to be looking to save £1.3 billion a year from changes to the WCA after pledging to match spending commitments made by the previous government – but not necessarily the policy detail.

The party has said it will re-consult on the changes after the Conservatives’ consultation on the plans was found unlawful by a High Court judge for being “unfair” and “misleading.”

This work capability assessment is used to determine a person’s ability to participate in the workforce. It decides what work-related activities they must carry out and if they are entitled to any extra support.

It has attracted controversy since its introduction in 2008, with reports in 2018 and 2023 both finding that too many incorrect assessment decisions continue to fuel mistrust of the process.

The previous Conservative government announced in 2023 that the Work Capability Assessment (WCA) would be reformed, with the qualifying criteria being significantly overhauled.

According to research from the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP), the changes would have meant that around 450,000 fewer people were considered to have limited capability for work.

PIP changes

The Personal Independence Payment (PIP) is another health-related benefit. Unlike the WCA, assessments for PIP set out to determine if someone needs help with extra living costs, even if they’re working.

It is currently paid in two parts – daily living and mobility – at two possible rates each, meaning there are four potential levels of payment. Assessors will decide if the applicant needs help with everyday tasks for the first part, and if they need help with getting around for the second.

They will then “score” them against twelve descriptors to determine if they are eligible for the lower or high weekly rate of each part. The maximum a person can be paid a week is £184.30.

The previous Conservative government had consulted on changing the assessment to widen the rates of payment. One idea was to follow the model used in Norway, where claimants would need to provide a letter from their GP rather than attend face-to-face assessments. They would also need to provide evidence of the costs associated with their condition.

Labour has not ruled out the idea, with social security minister Stephen Timms telling MPs in October that the DWP was carrying out a “new survey of Personal Independence Payment customers to understand more about their disability-related needs.”

However, the party is also continuing work on a separate program to ‘overhaul’ the benefit, including decisions, eligibility and payments.

Benefit vouchers

There are concerns that the reforms to PIP could be taken even further, however, seeing weekly payments replaced with vouchers. This is another idea that the Conservatives said was under consideration in June. It has not be ruled out by Labour ministers.

While PIP payments are designed to with extra living costs, claimants are free to spend the money however they see fit. A voucher scheme could see this change, forcing claimants to only use funds for specific costs. Responding to the proposals, charity Disability Rights UK called them “insulting” and dangerous”.

It’s unlikely the government will press ahead with a move to vouchers, hinting that they are against the idea.

Responding to concerns raised by Work and Pensions Committee in November, secretary of state for work and pensions Liz Kendall said: “this issue of empowerment and giving people power and control over their lives is really important because I think it leads to better results, so I understand people’s real concerns about that”.

Labour MP and committee chairman Debbie Abrahams has since gone further in opposing the plans, telling The Mirror in December: “I think it’s nonsense and I cannot see that happen. It is suggesting that it’s ok for disabled people to be provided with a voucher instead of money - as though they aren’t responsible with their money.”

New bank account powers

As part of the DWP’s “fraud crackdown”, agents will be given new powers to recover money from those in debt to the department. The move is expected to save £1.5 billion over the next five years.

This will include the ability to ban individuals committing fraud from driving, and getting warrants to search their premises and seize items like smartphones and computers. This will only be in extreme cases, however.

The DWP will also gain the power to recover money directly from bank accounts of those not on benefits or in PAYE employment. It will be able to request bank statements to prove that there is enough money available to pay what is owed, although not access bank accounts directly.

Another bank power will include ‘eligibility verification’ which will give the DWP the power to require banks to provide data to help identify when an applicant is not meeting the eligibility criteria for a benefit they have applied for. For instance, to be eligible for Universal Credit, an applicant must have no more than £16,000 in savings, except in exceptional circumstances.

The Fraud, Error and Recovery bill which is set to deliver these changes is currently in its committee stage, with stakeholders giving evidence on its contents. Several experts have expressed concern that ministers have said a code of practice will only be shared when the bill is in its final version, meaning it is unclear how the powers it grants will work in practice.

However, the DWP has said they will carry out a public consultation on the draft of the code, which will be laid before Parliament before publication.

A DWP Spokesperson said: “We do not comment on speculation.

“We have been clear that the current welfare system needs reform, so it is fairer on the taxpayer, helps long-term sick and disabled people who can work to find employment, and ensures people receive the support they need. We will bring forward our proposals for reform within weeks, as part of the Plan for Change.”

 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
14,345
2,378
113
Ghawar
One change they could make which they wouldn't is welfare spending of
billions on foreign aid to fuel a regional conflict. Charity begins at home.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Deeds

southpaw

Well-known member
May 21, 2002
786
744
113
I thought Kier Starmer was a socialist. I guess he's run out of other people's money, as Maggie once quipped.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
30,013
8,009
113
The Conservatives really screwed up the economy with that bullshit Brexit, that has impacted the UK Economy in a very negative manner!!
With inflation much higher than that in Canada, the British households are real suffering!!
The Labour Party will eventually steer a sinking ship that they inherited!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
14,345
2,378
113
Ghawar
.....................
The Labour Party will eventually steer a sinking ship that they inherited!!

Here is Keir Starmer's plan to steer UK's sinking ship of the economy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Starmer’s Plan for UK Growth Is the Ukraine War

Mark Curtis on the Labour government’s increase in military spending and its extraordinary new agreement with Ukraine.

Feb 27, 2025
Mark Curtis
  • U.K. military spending and aid to Ukraine are effectively providing a public subsidy to British arms firms.
  • One major Defence Ministry contractor is currently being investigated by the Serious Fraud Office for suspected bribery and corruption.

Wars can be useful to governments, and the horrendous conflict in Ukraine is so proving.

In his announcement of increases in U.K. military spending, Prime Minister Keir Starmer strongly referenced Ukraine and the threat from Russia and said the new “investment” will “create a secure and stable environment in which businesses can thrive, supporting the Government’s number one mission to deliver economic growth.”

He added: “The increased spending will sustain our globally competitive industry, supporting highly skilled jobs and apprenticeships across the whole of the U.K.”

Starmer sees the increase in funds to the military as part of Labour’s Plan for Change, its overarching economic growth strategy for Britain.

A few weeks ago, Foreign Secretary David Lammy echoed his prime minister in comments to an audience of arms firms about the extraordinary 100-year partnership between the U.K. and Ukraine. He said the new accord, which was signed in January, is “a platform for the U.K. defence industry” to extend military equipment to Ukraine.

Lammy added: “The U.K.’s defence industry is key to our growth and security by creating jobs, driving forward innovation and collaborating internationally.”

Britain’s supply of billions worth of military equipment to Ukraine is openly seen by the government as both boosting the fortunes of U.K. arms firms and promoting Labour’s whole economic growth strategy.

Giant U.K. arms firms like BAE Systems, Babcock and Thales U.K. will all likely benefit from increased military spending. They are already benefiting from new procurement contracts from the Ministry of Defence (MoD) as the U.K. gifts its current stocks of military equipment to Ukraine.

Much of U.K. military aid to Ukraine — which amounts to £4.5 billion this year — is really a subsidy to these arms firms.

Militarisation

The government has made no secret of the fact that it wants to “make the defence sector an engine for U.K. growth.”

Defence Minister Luke Pollard says that supplying Ukraine with weapons helps with “bolstering our own defence industrial base — creating jobs and driving investment.”

“By deepening our ties with Ukraine’s defence industry, we are expanding [our] own industrial capacity,” observes Major General Anna-Lee Reilly, who coordinates the MoD’s military support to Ukraine. She adds that U.K.-Ukraine military collaboration is about “opening up opportunities for the U.K. defence industry.”

The government can be given full marks for transparency. Its new Defence Industrial Strategy, announced last December, openly seeks to increase U.K. arms exports and arms industry jobs “in every nation and region of the U.K.” whilst prioritising British arms firms for government investment.

Ukraine is central to this thinking. The government’s policy paper on the new strategy states:

“Ukraine remains front of mind as this Government develops our new approach to its Defence Industrial Strategy: at this critical moment in the war, we must step up our efforts to supply military support and stand with Ukraine for as long as it takes.”

Ukraine already uses 17 different types of weapons and equipment made by BAE Systems, the U.K.’s largest arms company, such as Challenger tanks, armoured vehicles and ammunition.

Not only the war but the peace, when it eventually comes, will also be profitable. This year, Ukraine plans to spend a record $35 billion on arms production, with the U.K. financing the production of equipment such as air defence systems and long-range weapons in Ukraine.

Military Aid

The U.K. has already provided nearly £8 billion in military support to Ukraine since Russia’s invasion in 2022, with around 400 different capabilities sent to the country. This includes thousands of missiles and drones, over 10m rounds of ammunition, 14 tanks, as well as artillery guns, combat vehicles and naval vessels.

The £3 billion a year the government has pledged in military aid to Ukraine is additional to the MoD’s main budget and comes from the Treasury Reserve.

Equipment from the U.K. is either donated from existing U.K. defence stocks, purchased from British arms firms or else purchased from the surplus stocks of foreign governments.

This acquisition is either funded directly or coordinated through mechanisms such as the International Fund for Ukraine, of which the U.K. is also the administrator.

In addition, the U.K. is providing a £2.26 billion loan to Ukraine to enable it to “invest in key equipment, including British equipment,” the government says.

It’s no surprise that Ukraine has become a new, major market for British arms exports. In the 10 years up to Russia’s invasion in 2022, U.K. firms sold only around £35 million of military equipment. In the three years since the invasion, 2022-24, exports skyrocketed to £1.1 billion.

Replenishing Stocks

One way the procurement system for Ukraine benefits arms companies is when the MoD replenishes British military stocks after gifting the same equipment to Ukraine.

In fact, the National Audit Office (NAO) estimates that the MoD will spend £2.7 billion on replacing equipment donated to Ukraine from U.K. stockpiles in the first two years of the war alone. The NAO further says that the MoD spent £2.4 billion on procuring equipment for Ukraine in 715 contracts, over the same period.

So desperate has the MoD been to get equipment to Ukraine rapidly that it has often given awards to arms firms through “non-competitive procurements with reduced oversight requirements,” the NAO says.

The U.K. has gifted hundreds of “lightweight multirole missiles” (LMMs) to Ukraine, which can be used against drones, helicopters or naval vessels. To replenish the U.K.’s own stocks, various contracts have been awarded to arms firm, Thales UK, which assembles the missiles at its factory in Belfast.

In July 2024, when the MoD announced an order for LMMs worth £176 million, Defence Procurement Minister Maria Eagle said “this contract is … a great example of how defence investment can support economic growth and sustain jobs in the U.K. for years to come.”

Last September Defence Secretary John Healey announced a further award benefitting Thales — a contract worth £162 million to supply Ukraine with 650 LMMs. The MoD said categorically: “This contract with Thales in the U.K. will further prime the world leading British defence industry to increase production rates, enabling future production to be ramped up.”

Thales has also received new orders from the MoD to supply Starstreak high velocity missiles and anti-tank weapons after that equipment has been gifted to Ukraine.

These contracts are especially noteworthy in that Thales is currently being investigated by the Serious Fraud Office for suspected bribery and corruption. The probe is reportedly over suspicions of corruption linked to arms sales abroad. Thales denies the allegations.

After the MoD gifts military equipment to Ukraine, it often awards repair and maintenance contracts to U.K. firms for the same weapons.

Earlier this month arms firm Babcock — another prominent MoD contractor —was awarded a multi-million pound contract to train Ukrainian personnel to maintain and repair military equipment including Challenger 2 tanks donated by Britain.

The supply of drones is another benefit to U.K. industry, highlighted by Britain being the largest provider of military drones to Ukraine.

When Rishi Sunak’s Conservative government announced a £200 million package of military support to Ukraine in February 2024 it stated that “the majority of this £200 million will be spent on U.K. domestic drone and component manufacturing and software development.

When Labour took office, the U.K. committed to supplying over £300 million of advanced drones to Ukraine. In July 2024 the MoD said that the international drone coalition — which is co-led by the U.K. and Latvia — “has rapidly deployed thousands of drones to support Ukraine whilst also boosting the U.K. defence industry.”

New Offices in Ukraine

The generous funding of arms corporations by the government, and ultimately the British public, is enabling them to set up new offices and ventures in Ukraine to deepen military collaboration in the future.

“It was British defence companies that were the first to open their offices here after the start of the great war,” Alexander Kamyshin, Ukraine’s minister of strategic industries, has said.

BAE opened a site in Ukraine in August 2023 to produce L119 field guns, and to build “a strong and sustainable technological defense-industrial complex,” the corporation’s chief, Charles Woodburn, announced while meeting President Volodymyr Zelensky.

A few months later, the U.K.’s MoD announced a contract for BAE to maintain and repair the L119 guns the U.K. military had gifted to Ukraine.

BAE is also opening a new artillery factory in the U.K. to produce howitzers for Ukraine, with production expected to begin this year. This effectively reverses the company’s earlier decision to scale down artillery production in the U.K.

In addition, BAE was given a £190 million contract in 2023 to produce 155mm artillery shells for the British army after the U.K. had gifted millions of rounds of ammunition to Ukraine.

This “will significantly increase BAE Systems’ production capacity, delivering an eight-fold increase and secure increased sovereign capacity for ammunition for years to come,” an MoD official said.

Similarly, Babcock established an office in Ukraine in October 2023 and announced in May 2024 it was setting up an in-country engineering facility to repair and overhaul Ukraine’s military vehicles. The company is also training Ukraine’s air force pilots.

100 Years of Arms Exports

The 100-year partnership agreement between London and Kyiv has in its Article 1 a focus on strengthening “military and defence industrial capabilities, including force development and collaboration between their defence industrial bases.”

Its declaration calls for “developing advanced weapons and ammunition manufacturing capabilities,” deepening “cooperation on long-range strike capabilities, integrated air and missile defence and complex weapons stockpiles.” There is also mention of “joint arms exports to foreign markets.”

Zelensky personally met senior U.K. military figures and representatives of BAE, Thales U.K., Babcock and other British arms firms on a visit to London in July 2024. The U.K. has conducted no less than five military trade missions to Kyiv since 2023.

The first of those missions, in December 2023, resulted in new agreements with Babcock, BAE and Thales. Mark Goldsack, the U.K.’s director of defence and security exports said: “With agreements already signed with our defence industry, the work will help boost resilience for both our industrial bases for years to come.”

Goldsack is not joking. The U.K. has created a new market for its military industry and is apparently seeking to exploit it for the next hundred years.

 

jalimon

Well-known member
Jan 10, 2016
7,737
8,000
113
One change they could make which they wouldn't is welfare spending of
billions on foreign aid to fuel a regional conflict. Charity begins at home.
The irony is that the billions in spending to help Ukraine are good for the country.

Mitch McOnell, yes, yes Mitch, explained it perfectly. When the US announces 1 billion for Ukraine, it's money almost entirely spent in the US for military operations.

Canada, Japan, USA, New Zealand, and Australia have signed pacts to help the Philippines defend their territory against China.

For Europe's peace, Russia cannot take Ukraine. For Asia, China cannot claim territories belonging to the Philippines. There are many more examples like that. And the reason is simple. If we let this happen, the conqueror just won't stop...
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
95,731
24,496
113
The irony is that the billions in spending to help Ukraine are good for the country.

Mitch McOnell, yes, yes Mitch, explained it perfectly. When the US announces 1 billion for Ukraine, it's money almost entirely spent in the US for military operations.

Canada, Japan, USA, New Zealand, and Australia have signed pacts to help the Philippines defend their territory against China.

For Europe's peace, Russia cannot take Ukraine. For Asia, China cannot claim territories belonging to the Philippines. There are many more examples like that. And the reason is simple. If we let this happen, the conqueror just won't stop...
Two things:

trump seems to believe in conquest as a business model, so seems to support Russia taking Ukraine, Israel taking Palestine and the US taking Greenland, Canada or Panama. Which is why he backs Putin and Netanyahu over any trade deals, why deal when you can take what you want by force.

The trump business model also doesn't use treaties or partnerships. Why not just rip off your suppliers and beat them in court, or even better fix the courts in your favour.
Sending Ukraine used american arms was good for the war machine but not for trump's model.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jalimon

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
30,013
8,009
113
Here is Keir Starmer's plan to steer UK's sinking ship of the economy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Starmer’s Plan for UK Growth Is the Ukraine War

Mark Curtis on the Labour government’s increase in military spending and its extraordinary new agreement with Ukraine.

Feb 27, 2025
Mark Curtis
  • U.K. military spending and aid to Ukraine are effectively providing a public subsidy to British arms firms.
  • One major Defence Ministry contractor is currently being investigated by the Serious Fraud Office for suspected bribery and corruption.

Wars can be useful to governments, and the horrendous conflict in Ukraine is so proving.

In his announcement of increases in U.K. military spending, Prime Minister Keir Starmer strongly referenced Ukraine and the threat from Russia and said the new “investment” will “create a secure and stable environment in which businesses can thrive, supporting the Government’s number one mission to deliver economic growth.”

He added: “The increased spending will sustain our globally competitive industry, supporting highly skilled jobs and apprenticeships across the whole of the U.K.”

Starmer sees the increase in funds to the military as part of Labour’s Plan for Change, its overarching economic growth strategy for Britain.

A few weeks ago, Foreign Secretary David Lammy echoed his prime minister in comments to an audience of arms firms about the extraordinary 100-year partnership between the U.K. and Ukraine. He said the new accord, which was signed in January, is “a platform for the U.K. defence industry” to extend military equipment to Ukraine.

Lammy added: “The U.K.’s defence industry is key to our growth and security by creating jobs, driving forward innovation and collaborating internationally.”

Britain’s supply of billions worth of military equipment to Ukraine is openly seen by the government as both boosting the fortunes of U.K. arms firms and promoting Labour’s whole economic growth strategy.

Giant U.K. arms firms like BAE Systems, Babcock and Thales U.K. will all likely benefit from increased military spending. They are already benefiting from new procurement contracts from the Ministry of Defence (MoD) as the U.K. gifts its current stocks of military equipment to Ukraine.

Much of U.K. military aid to Ukraine — which amounts to £4.5 billion this year — is really a subsidy to these arms firms.

Militarisation

The government has made no secret of the fact that it wants to “make the defence sector an engine for U.K. growth.”

Defence Minister Luke Pollard says that supplying Ukraine with weapons helps with “bolstering our own defence industrial base — creating jobs and driving investment.”

“By deepening our ties with Ukraine’s defence industry, we are expanding [our] own industrial capacity,” observes Major General Anna-Lee Reilly, who coordinates the MoD’s military support to Ukraine. She adds that U.K.-Ukraine military collaboration is about “opening up opportunities for the U.K. defence industry.”

The government can be given full marks for transparency. Its new Defence Industrial Strategy, announced last December, openly seeks to increase U.K. arms exports and arms industry jobs “in every nation and region of the U.K.” whilst prioritising British arms firms for government investment.

Ukraine is central to this thinking. The government’s policy paper on the new strategy states:

“Ukraine remains front of mind as this Government develops our new approach to its Defence Industrial Strategy: at this critical moment in the war, we must step up our efforts to supply military support and stand with Ukraine for as long as it takes.”

Ukraine already uses 17 different types of weapons and equipment made by BAE Systems, the U.K.’s largest arms company, such as Challenger tanks, armoured vehicles and ammunition.

Not only the war but the peace, when it eventually comes, will also be profitable. This year, Ukraine plans to spend a record $35 billion on arms production, with the U.K. financing the production of equipment such as air defence systems and long-range weapons in Ukraine.

Military Aid

The U.K. has already provided nearly £8 billion in military support to Ukraine since Russia’s invasion in 2022, with around 400 different capabilities sent to the country. This includes thousands of missiles and drones, over 10m rounds of ammunition, 14 tanks, as well as artillery guns, combat vehicles and naval vessels.

The £3 billion a year the government has pledged in military aid to Ukraine is additional to the MoD’s main budget and comes from the Treasury Reserve.

Equipment from the U.K. is either donated from existing U.K. defence stocks, purchased from British arms firms or else purchased from the surplus stocks of foreign governments.

This acquisition is either funded directly or coordinated through mechanisms such as the International Fund for Ukraine, of which the U.K. is also the administrator.

In addition, the U.K. is providing a £2.26 billion loan to Ukraine to enable it to “invest in key equipment, including British equipment,” the government says.

It’s no surprise that Ukraine has become a new, major market for British arms exports. In the 10 years up to Russia’s invasion in 2022, U.K. firms sold only around £35 million of military equipment. In the three years since the invasion, 2022-24, exports skyrocketed to £1.1 billion.

Replenishing Stocks

One way the procurement system for Ukraine benefits arms companies is when the MoD replenishes British military stocks after gifting the same equipment to Ukraine.

In fact, the National Audit Office (NAO) estimates that the MoD will spend £2.7 billion on replacing equipment donated to Ukraine from U.K. stockpiles in the first two years of the war alone. The NAO further says that the MoD spent £2.4 billion on procuring equipment for Ukraine in 715 contracts, over the same period.

So desperate has the MoD been to get equipment to Ukraine rapidly that it has often given awards to arms firms through “non-competitive procurements with reduced oversight requirements,” the NAO says.

The U.K. has gifted hundreds of “lightweight multirole missiles” (LMMs) to Ukraine, which can be used against drones, helicopters or naval vessels. To replenish the U.K.’s own stocks, various contracts have been awarded to arms firm, Thales UK, which assembles the missiles at its factory in Belfast.

In July 2024, when the MoD announced an order for LMMs worth £176 million, Defence Procurement Minister Maria Eagle said “this contract is … a great example of how defence investment can support economic growth and sustain jobs in the U.K. for years to come.”

Last September Defence Secretary John Healey announced a further award benefitting Thales — a contract worth £162 million to supply Ukraine with 650 LMMs. The MoD said categorically: “This contract with Thales in the U.K. will further prime the world leading British defence industry to increase production rates, enabling future production to be ramped up.”

Thales has also received new orders from the MoD to supply Starstreak high velocity missiles and anti-tank weapons after that equipment has been gifted to Ukraine.

These contracts are especially noteworthy in that Thales is currently being investigated by the Serious Fraud Office for suspected bribery and corruption. The probe is reportedly over suspicions of corruption linked to arms sales abroad. Thales denies the allegations.

After the MoD gifts military equipment to Ukraine, it often awards repair and maintenance contracts to U.K. firms for the same weapons.

Earlier this month arms firm Babcock — another prominent MoD contractor —was awarded a multi-million pound contract to train Ukrainian personnel to maintain and repair military equipment including Challenger 2 tanks donated by Britain.

The supply of drones is another benefit to U.K. industry, highlighted by Britain being the largest provider of military drones to Ukraine.

When Rishi Sunak’s Conservative government announced a £200 million package of military support to Ukraine in February 2024 it stated that “the majority of this £200 million will be spent on U.K. domestic drone and component manufacturing and software development.

When Labour took office, the U.K. committed to supplying over £300 million of advanced drones to Ukraine. In July 2024 the MoD said that the international drone coalition — which is co-led by the U.K. and Latvia — “has rapidly deployed thousands of drones to support Ukraine whilst also boosting the U.K. defence industry.”

New Offices in Ukraine

The generous funding of arms corporations by the government, and ultimately the British public, is enabling them to set up new offices and ventures in Ukraine to deepen military collaboration in the future.

“It was British defence companies that were the first to open their offices here after the start of the great war,” Alexander Kamyshin, Ukraine’s minister of strategic industries, has said.

BAE opened a site in Ukraine in August 2023 to produce L119 field guns, and to build “a strong and sustainable technological defense-industrial complex,” the corporation’s chief, Charles Woodburn, announced while meeting President Volodymyr Zelensky.

A few months later, the U.K.’s MoD announced a contract for BAE to maintain and repair the L119 guns the U.K. military had gifted to Ukraine.

BAE is also opening a new artillery factory in the U.K. to produce howitzers for Ukraine, with production expected to begin this year. This effectively reverses the company’s earlier decision to scale down artillery production in the U.K.

In addition, BAE was given a £190 million contract in 2023 to produce 155mm artillery shells for the British army after the U.K. had gifted millions of rounds of ammunition to Ukraine.

This “will significantly increase BAE Systems’ production capacity, delivering an eight-fold increase and secure increased sovereign capacity for ammunition for years to come,” an MoD official said.

Similarly, Babcock established an office in Ukraine in October 2023 and announced in May 2024 it was setting up an in-country engineering facility to repair and overhaul Ukraine’s military vehicles. The company is also training Ukraine’s air force pilots.

100 Years of Arms Exports

The 100-year partnership agreement between London and Kyiv has in its Article 1 a focus on strengthening “military and defence industrial capabilities, including force development and collaboration between their defence industrial bases.”

Its declaration calls for “developing advanced weapons and ammunition manufacturing capabilities,” deepening “cooperation on long-range strike capabilities, integrated air and missile defence and complex weapons stockpiles.” There is also mention of “joint arms exports to foreign markets.”

Zelensky personally met senior U.K. military figures and representatives of BAE, Thales U.K., Babcock and other British arms firms on a visit to London in July 2024. The U.K. has conducted no less than five military trade missions to Kyiv since 2023.

The first of those missions, in December 2023, resulted in new agreements with Babcock, BAE and Thales. Mark Goldsack, the U.K.’s director of defence and security exports said: “With agreements already signed with our defence industry, the work will help boost resilience for both our industrial bases for years to come.”

Goldsack is not joking. The U.K. has created a new market for its military industry and is apparently seeking to exploit it for the next hundred years.

Once again, the biggest mistake that caused that havoc in the UK was Brexit. A very rash and poorly hatched out plan that led to multiple PM resignations.
At least Starmer wants to re-negotiate its trade relations with the EU who seem to be open to it!!

Britain’s biggest unions call for much closer UK-EU ties amid ‘volatile’ global economy
Exclusive: union umbrella body calls for new cooperation agreement ahead of Keir Starmer’s reset talks with Brussels


No wonder that a substantial UK citizens who voted for Brexit are now regretting it!!
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts