It was definitely feeling that way. It was almost surreal.It was so bad that at one point I thought she would just say she was punking the public and her campaign was just a practical joke.
It was definitely feeling that way. It was almost surreal.It was so bad that at one point I thought she would just say she was punking the public and her campaign was just a practical joke.
I see, so an educated individual in the field of economics knows nothing?? Isn't O'leary the last dragon most who would do a pitch wanted to get involved with?? Isn't O'leary suspected of driving his boat drunk, killing someone and letting his wife take the fall albeit found not guilty but money goes a long way to win a case. This is the guy you will believe but that makes sense since you support a felon like Trumpy.Yeah Trump was responsible for the virus,lol.....She's classic TDS.
Love O'leary...He just gets right down to it every time..My guess is the female here doesn't own one business and never will.
Just looked her up and she works for The Washington Post, lol...Some real non partisan attitude there.
Bet ya Pondering dude follows her on Twitter...
Stupid...ill-tempered': McConnell reportedly unloads on Trump in new book
Quit expecting squeegee to be intelligent. He;s intellectually handicappedNobody cares about the opinions of washed up neocons. You're stuck in the 90s and early 2000s.
Further... it always comes with the caveat of selling a book.
Do you not see how you're duped by this silly stuff?
ah yes when all else fails turn to conspiracy theories.Isn't O'leary the last dragon most who would do a pitch wanted to get involved with?? Isn't O'leary suspected of driving his boat drunk, killing someone and letting his wife take the fall albeit found not guilty but money goes a long way to win a case.
He specifies who the "enemies" are.Beav, I actually watched this clip earlier in the evening. I didn't get the commentator's point then and I don't get it now.
Can you break it down for us? What is Trump saying other than he has been investigated more than Alphonse Capone? Was the "enemy from within" the big takeaway? I'm not sure that was the big Fox edit that this guy makes it out to be. I've heard "enemy from within" many times.
So you and K Douglas are both fine with sending the military to "deal" with Adam Schiff and the Pelosis and all those Democrats Trump deems a suitable target?I'm not sure pro-Harris members here understood this nuance. The MSNBC announcers were dramatizing the "enemies from within" language for political effect.
I thought it was great that he did. Somebody on his staff is in trouble. Baier doesn't seem like an easy-going, oh-well mistakes happen kind of boss.He specifies who the "enemies" are.
Brett Baier even apologized and admitted he played the wrong clip, didn't he?
Trumpland is one giant scurrilous book. Fine. We all got it.Nobody cares about the opinions of washed up neocons. You're stuck in the 90s and early 2000s.
Further... it always comes with the caveat of selling a book.
Do you not see how you're duped by this silly stuff?
I haven't seen a clip of Trump specifically saying he would use the military to deal with Schiff and/or Pelosi. Schiff is a very objectionable character, but that's about it.So you and K Douglas are both fine with sending the military to "deal" with Adam Schiff and the Pelosis and all those Democrats Trump deems a suitable target?
Good to know.
That's my view, too, now that I've seen it.So, after watching the interview this morning, I thought she did very well. She held her own against a tough interviewer, and pushed back on some of Fox's bullshit. Was it perfect? Nope. But, I think she came out looking pretty confident and comfortable.
Fox is on by default in lots of places.But, I will say this: How many Fox viewers did this persuade to vote for her? I mean, it is possible that several were swayed. But, I think the average Fox viewer is a MAGA cultist, and this was just an opportunity for them to hate watch her.
Trump can barely do friendly interviews anymore.Now, the question we must ask....Why isn't Trump doing interviews with CNN/MSNBC/NBC/CBS/ABC? I'm pretty confident the reason is likely he knows they will push back against his bullshit. Or that in his mental state he cannot articulate answers without rambling like an old codger who is quickly going senile.
Foreigners, specifically, as I am sure someone else has pointed out by now.Betting odds? I think that means people are putting more money on Trump to win as the long shot....I mean, if you want to make money in the face of a disaster like another Trump administration, that would be the way to do it...
The complete disrespect Elon has for the people on X is kind of impressive.
This is a problem across mainstream media in particular.I guess it depends on what you think Baier's objective should be.
Should he try to go out of his way to embarrass her because that's what many media outlets do with Republicans? Sort of evening the score.
Or do you think he should press her on major issues and stand above other media?
Yes, but fewer than Trump.That is a nonsense reply. They all wear bulletproof suits now, have extensive security detachments and take all kinds of arrangements.
I have no doubt it's the Secret Service recommended the screen.
Does Kamala even do an outdoor rally?
Don't get it.If Mitch being in overdrive signals a Harris success, I think we can declare Carter as the 1980 victor. Whoo-hoo, that peanut farmer gone done it again!
That's not quite correct.When a candidate perceives election momentum swinging their way, it's not unusual for them to be more cautious in their approach. Maybe Trump's just running out the clock until November 5. That's his campaign's prerogative and it could backfire.
A position I stand by.I believe Valcazar agreed that candidates were under no obligation to debate and grant interviews.
They wouldn't be "matching wits" with him.I was equally amused by this revelation. I would not want to be the one to try and match wits with that man.
What scrutiny is needed?...while Harris is the first presidential candidate in 40 years to not show up at the Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner yesterday.
Where's the scrutiny there?