She was a respected and effective practicing criminal prosecutor. Can;t think of a more unforgiving forum not to be able to think and speak on your feet.
Not the same as press conferences.
I don't think she is that great at those.
She prefers being in charge of the questioning, from what I can see.
But "not liking the press" and "not being great with reporters" isn't the same as "can't think on her feet".
She also seems to know she won't get the softball treatment Trump gets.
Maybe she has the wisdom to know when to keep her mouth shut and stick to the program so as to make bottom dwellers make themselves look like idiots for trying to pick apart semantics of audio clips?
Do you really think that a person who went to law school, became a criminal prosecutor, District Attorney and Attorney General of California doesn't understand digital storage? FFS, it's been a practical evidentiary matter for decades. You really think she thinks documents are evaporated and stored in condensed atmospheric forms? Or that her audience doesn't understand what she is speaking about when it comes to privacy and evidentiary matters when it comes to digital vs physical records? Because that was the subject of the discussion.
Unlike Trump who does NOT and cannot use a computer, least of all understand the basics of computing. Who would actually believe that data is literally stored in a cloud.
Remember too that this talk is from over a decade ago.
Even if you were stupid enough to believe that this clip shows she thought files were stored in a literal cloud back when the term was becoming popular, there would be no reason to believe she hasn't learned anything since then.
