Toronto Escorts

Justin was right after all

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
No proof of that, unless you can show us that so called "proof"!!

The only one we all know who was a bitch of a foreign Government is of course Trump being that of Russia. LOL!!
ROTFLMFAO!! What proof? The PC MPP left caucus because he was financed by China. Exactly the same is happening on the federal level, according to CSIS. And Justin knew about it years ago, been found out and, as per usual, he's stonewalling. Don't you worry about it? Or did the politics made you so twisted, you're willing to sell your own country to murderous China? And for whom???? Fucking Justin?!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: squeezer

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
82,560
18,497
113
ROTFLMFAO!! What proof? The PC MPP left caucus because he was financed by China. Exactly the same is happening on the federal level, according to CSIS. And Justin knew about it years ago, been found out and, as per usual, he's stonewalling. Don't you worry about it? Or did the politics made you so twisted, you're willing to sell your own country to murderous China? And for whom???? Fucking Justin?!
So now you're coming down hard on Justin for not investigating Doug Ford's conservative party and their Chinese backers?
LOL
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,668
5,793
113
ROTFLMFAO!! What proof? The PC MPP left caucus because he was financed by China. Exactly the same is happening on the federal level, according to CSIS. And Justin knew about it years ago, been found out and, as per usual, he's stonewalling. Don't you worry about it? Or did the politics made you so twisted, you're willing to sell your own country to murderous China? And for whom???? Fucking Justin?!
Again, post some real proof and links rather than some general alt right allegations. What exactly did they do as the CSIS clearly stated that the outcome of the Elections would have been no different!! No one is stonewalling, when an independent Rapporteur will be appointed to investigate the collusion that so far has pointed in the direction of the Conservatives!!
If Harper and Pee Pee did not want a true public enquiry in the Robocalls that may have actually swung the pendulum in the Conservatives favour, why is Pee Pee being the true asshole of a hypocrite to now demand something that he was once against??
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
Again, post some real proof and links rather than some general alt right allegations. What exactly did they do as the CSIS clearly stated that the outcome of the Elections would have been no different!! No one is stonewalling, when an independent Rapporteur will be appointed to investigate the collusion that so far has pointed in the direction of the Conservatives!!
If Harper and Pee Pee did not want a true public enquiry in the Robocalls that may have actually swung the pendulum in the Conservatives favour, why is Pee Pee being the true asshole of a hypocrite to now demand something that he was once against??
You should add the Chinese flag to your collage. Justin and Jag are AGAINST full, open and independent inquiry into the China collusion. Full stop.
 

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,440
1,776
113
You should add the Chinese flag to your collage. Justin and Jag are AGAINST full, open and independent inquiry into the China collusion. Full stop.
He's so against it, he created a task force made up of intelligence/law enforcement, created a set of guidelines, created a non-partisan oversight group, sent out information up all MPs, and has now appointed a new rapporteur to look into it.

The only complaint you could have is that's it's not public. But as I've said elsewhere in this thread, it relates to National Security so that may be off the table, and Conservatives have piped up defending the non-partisan oversight group and criticizing Pierre Poilievre's attacks against it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
He's so against it, he created a task force made up of intelligence/law enforcement, created a set of guidelines, created a non-partisan oversight group, sent out information up all MPs, and has now appointed a new rapporteur to look into it.

The only complaint you could have is that's it's not public. But as I've said elsewhere in this thread, it relates to National Security so that may be off the table, and Conservatives have piped up defending the non-partisan oversight group and criticizing Pierre Poilievre's attacks against it.
Yes, his own rat, like in the Emergencies Act inquiry, only this one can do it behind closed doors because of "national security ". ROTFLMFAO!!
 

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,440
1,776
113
Yes, his own rat, like in the Emergencies Act inquiry, only this one can do it behind closed doors because of "national security ". ROTFLMFAO!!
Sure, skip everything else, including the part about Conservatives blasting Pierre Poilievre's politicizing of the issue and affirming the effectiveness of the non-partisan committee that was formed to oversee this. Not to mention they even said it needs to remain secret. Of course, if it doesn't fit your agenda, just pretend it doesn't exist.

Guess I can safely add you to list of partisan shills and hacks that do nothing but troll. See ya.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
Sure, skip everything else, including the part about Conservatives blasting Pierre Poilievre's politicizing of the issue and affirming the effectiveness of the non-partisan committee that was formed to oversee this. Not to mention they even said it needs to remain secret. Of course, if it doesn't fit your agenda, just pretend it doesn't exist.

Guess I can safely add you to list of partisan shills and hacks that do nothing but troll. See ya.
If you're not for an open, honest and independent inquiry, like Justin, you're China shill.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Toronto Passions

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,440
1,776
113
If you're not for an open, honest and independent inquiry, like Justin, you're China shill.
Interestingly, if one was a Chinese agent, forcing the government to make the enquiry public and exposing any mitigations we have in place to counter their efforts wouldn't be a bad idea. You and Pierre Poilievre might be playing right into the hands of MSS!

I'm also all four an honest and independent inquiry, which we have. So let's just be clear about that: the only thing we disagree on is the "public" part. Should I say, "If you're not into a secure, independent, detailed, and thorough investigation, you're a Chinese agent"? That would be silly, as I'm sure you're all for it being independent, detailed, and thorough, right? It only makes sense to mention the difference: public or secure.

I would be very upset if the government did nothing. But I can point to a laundry list of things they've done, no matter how much you try to ignore them. And I can point to multiple ongoing investigations involving all major parties, all intelligence agencies, and all law enforcement agencies, and I know even if one group in there did want to bury something, they wouldn't be able to. Even if that group is the PMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bver_hunter

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
Interestingly, if one was a Chinese agent, forcing the government to make the enquiry public and exposing any mitigations we have in place to counter their efforts wouldn't be a bad idea. You and Pierre Poilievre might be playing right into the hands of MSS!

I'm also all four an honest and independent inquiry, which we have. So let's just be clear about that: the only thing we disagree on is the "public" part. Should I say, "If you're not into a secure, independent, detailed, and thorough investigation, you're a Chinese agent"? That would be silly, as I'm sure you're all for it being independent, detailed, and thorough, right? It only makes sense to mention the difference: public or secure.

I would be very upset if the government did nothing. But I can point to a laundry list of things they've done, no matter how much you try to ignore them. And I can point to multiple ongoing investigations involving all major parties, all intelligence agencies, and all law enforcement agencies, and I know even if one group in there did want to bury something, they wouldn't be able to. Even if that group is the PMO.
It's the integrity of our electoral process that's at stake. Like justice, not only it has to be done, but above all, it must be seen done. Everything else is partisan spin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnLarue

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,440
1,776
113
It's the integrity of our electoral process that's at stake. Like justice, not only it has to be done, but above all, it must be seen done. Everything else is partisan spin.
Pure hyperbole. If he appointed Pierre Poilievre as rapporteur, it would be partisan? Not to mention be defined a non-partisan committee can't be partisan.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
16,698
2,388
113
Pure hyperbole. If he appointed Pierre Poilievre as rapporteur, it would be partisan? Not to mention be defined a non-partisan committee can't be partisan.
you do not get it

a public enquiry is the only possible non-partisan enquiry

Justin's never ending parade of scandals also makes a public enquiry the only route available which would allow him to re-assure the public of the integrity of election process

the integrity of an election is the fundamental foundation for democracy.
Yet you are willing to sacrifice that integrity in order to keep your preferred fool ( Justin Trudeau) in power.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jcpro

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,668
5,793
113
You should add the Chinese flag to your collage. Justin and Jag are AGAINST full, open and independent inquiry into the China collusion. Full stop.
The only Chinese collusion revealed so far is with the Ontario Conservative Party!! Harpo and his pet Pee Pee refused to have an Independent Enquiry during the Robocall Election Scandal as I pointed out. When the shoe is on the other foot, obviously it does not fit!! :rolleyes:
 
Toronto Escorts