I can see why JG didn't want anything to do with her!I know exactly the one you are speaking about.They shot it on the Halifax Waterfront on the boardwalk.I remember when she was brought up in this, how damning this video might look.She did seem bitter and sketchy in it.Found it.In three parts .Just from one to the other two.The comments on clips 2 and 3 are pretty rough.The defense might like these vids
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUP-V2gsG7Y
Only because the witness' fuck this up.ohhhh shit. I am 95% sure he will not be guilty.
I think you are right.Ghomeshi will have to be found guilty of something.
Not really. No one important has their ego on the line - let alone their career. The Crown will say - correctly - that they were misled by complainants who lied and had their own agenda. Happens all the time. If JG walks, no one in authority will give a shit.I think you are right.
The whole thing ha turned into a giant shit show, but at the end of the day they will need to make an example of him.
And I'm convinced he'll walk. Well done ladies!Not really. No one important has their ego on the line - let alone their career. The Crown will say - correctly - that they were misled by complainants who lied and had their own agenda. Happens all the time. If JG walks, no one in authority will give a shit.
It has turned into a giant shit show.I think you are right.
The whole thing ha turned into a giant shit show, but at the end of the day they will need to make an example of him.
Actually..clearly, only because the investigating officers never did a thorough job in the course of their information gathering to prepare for the chargesOnly because the witness' fuck this up.
The problem, so far, is what abusive relationships? Right now we have nothing except hearsay and lies. Perhaps this guy is an asshole, perhaps he used his celebrity to score-no law against that. At this time, it's completely probable that he's innocent.It has turned into a giant shit show.
I don't think he will be found guilty but I also don't think this will end well for him. Even if he's found not guilty he won't get his old job back and I don't think he'd be able to sue CBC for wrongful dismissal either. His career in this country is pretty much done.
His behaviour may have been assault, it certainly wasn't bdsm, just abuse. There were lots of complainants originally, though only a few who agreed to testify. But even if they found another handful of ladies who had similar experiences it'll be hard to find him guilty.
And even though the world is rife with examples of abusive relationships that continue on and on, there has also to be some judgement on girls who enter into abusive relationships despite the warning signs.
Its greasy all around.
None of the testimony is hearsay. What gave you that idea?The problem, so far, is what abusive relationships? Right now we have nothing except hearsay and lies. Perhaps this guy is an asshole, perhaps he used his celebrity to score-no law against that. At this time, it's completely probable that he's innocent.
Normally, when a woman is "beaten" the police are called and then she is taken to hospital. None of this happened here.he likes beating up women but that he beats them up legally.
So am I to understand that thanks to these 'best' trial lawyers you witnessed - you were never convicted ? :eyebrows:Let me say (without bragging) that I "have been around" when it comes to trials, etc., and I have seen and heard the very best trial lawyers at work ....
These lawyers were so good I was not even charged!So am I to understand that thanks to these 'best' trial lawyers you witnessed - you were never convicted ? :eyebrows: