Quarterly yes. But they have only been around that long. And recieved zero money.
Will take your word for it. Like I said, happy for Weaver to be humiliated. Not a decent man.
Although I found his video clip on it. What he links too doesn't look like a filing. It looks like a placeholder because no filing has been made yet.
But yeah. Don't care either way. Weaver is a dick.
Says something about Biden support in that demographic.
That most realize weaver is a dick? It shows good sense. I see the other one that an ex Bernie guy started (the one that is doing Latino outreach) has a couple of million and seems to be running ads now. So it seems people knew who actually was doing something helpful and who was a scammer.
As to the rest as I said I'm disappointed in Trump on China, but they tend to think in generational terms and he thinks 5 minutes from now.
So you still can't explain what you mean by any of that. Cool. Cool.
If Trump wanted a war in Venezuela he could have had it. Bolton was pushing for it and if I'm not mistaken said it's one of the reasons he left. Because he wouldn't go there and was trying for troop removal in Afghanistan. Trump isn't a war monger. That's not how he makes money.
That you don't understand the American system really hampers these conversations. That you don't listen to Trump about his hardon for war as well. You are right that he doesn't believe in war for ideological reasons. He supported the Iraq war because he thought they could go in and steal oil easily. Trump will go to war for two reasons - "look tough" and "steal shit". That he hasn't been able to convince the army those are good reasons doesn't mean he doesn't want a war.
(He is going to do a domestic one for his "look tough" idea. Unfortunately for him, again, he couldn't convince the army to go along.)
As to SS he has been trying for decades. Right up to 2015.
That you don't understand things well enough to contextualize them makes these conversations difficult. Learn the difference between means and ends.
Now imagine a GOP controlled Senate and House in the mid terms(entirely possible) no Filibuster (he has expressed an interest in killing it) and the Covid 19 deficit as his excuse.
"Entitlements" have been one of the golden rings for the deficit hawks for a long time. And yes that includes some Democrats.
Good! A structural argument. So pitch me how that works. Biden wins president but the Dems lose the House. (unlikely combination, but ok)
The GOP, which is trying to cut social security right now - they are trying to include a way to fast track it in the COVID-19 relief bill, puts cuts to social security in a budget. This is, of course, Biden's fault? Amazing.
You want me to fear Biden on social security, give me a scenario where he makes it happen. Not one where he can't stop it.