CupidS Escorts

Its offical : Transphobia is here to stay!

Status
Not open for further replies.

RZG

Well-known member
Mar 4, 2007
876
919
93
Well, all the school boards these days, are so totally "woke", that I really do believe it!!
My neighbor is a teacher. She has told me lots about the woke, virtue signaling, brainwashing doctrine pushed down kids throats. No one fails ever, we are all equal, question nothing, do as instructed. For her, it`s toe the party line or GTFO. This country is in a world of trouble.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
22,228
17,295
113
Gentlemen, have your passports ready,
Please walk single file and be courteous,
when instructed, take a deep breath and jump



Enjoy your flight, please come again

DON'T FORGET TO LEAVE A REVIEW!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,899
103,013
113
"Discussions "...in the ELEMENTARY school.

Why not, JC?

Why shouldn't kids be told that Uncle Harry married another guy?.... Gay marriage is legal in the US and Canada.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,899
103,013
113
Mitchy, his bigot dad got him the shirt, groomed the kid to wear it and be a hater, wrote his speech for him and made him go and read it on video. The kid is 10 years old and has no idea of any of this shit.

This is grooming, Mitchy. The very thing you claim to be against.
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,899
103,013
113
The kid is 12 yrs old, and very intelligent!!
Since he's reading what his dad clearly wrote - given the style and syntax - how would we even know how smart he is?
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,899
103,013
113
That`s about one slip on a banana peel away from the direction of Nazi eugenics, via the way of California earlier.
Eugenics?!.... How?!

I take your point about the "woke" politics being simplistic and heavy-handed; but when did the school system get into eugenics?

Do you know what eugenics really is?
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,571
6,768
113
Why not, JC?

Why shouldn't kids be told that Uncle Harry married another guy?.... Gay marriage is legal in the US and Canada.
The question you should be asking is: why would you sexualize ELEMENTARY school children?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,899
103,013
113
The question you should be asking is: why would you sexualize ELEMENTARY school children?
But they're not. They're just explaining that Uncle Joe and Uncle Bernie are married like Mom and Dad. And guys marrying each other is legal in CA. So Joe and Bernie probably come over for family barbecues and the kids figure it out anyway.

They're not saying that Uncle Joe fucks Uncle Bernie in the ass.

When I was growing up, every book that a kid ever got in school had a wealthy, white middle class mom and dad who had 2, or 3 or 4 kids. EVERY FUCKING BOOK. There were no gays, no blacks, no poor people. You don't call that "grooming"?

The only Asian character in a kids' book I ever read was some people in the artist's imagination of Chinese traditional dress in Rupert Bear. And there was a family of golliwogs in another book. Golliwogs were parody Black people with fuzzy hair.

It's all "grooming", JC. Just different types of grooming.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,571
6,768
113
But they're not. They're just explaining that Uncle Joe and Uncle Bernie are married like Mom and Dad. And guys marrying each other is legal in CA. So Joe and Bernie probably come over for family barbecues and the kids figure it out anyway.

They're not saying that Uncle Joe fucks Uncle Bernie in the ass.

When I was growing up, every book that a kid ever got in school had a wealthy, white middle class mom and dad who had 2, or 3 or 4 kids. EVERY FUCKING BOOK. There were no gays, no blacks, no poor people. You don't call that "grooming"?

The only Asian character in a kids' book I ever read was some people in the artist's imagination of Chinese traditional dress in Rupert Bear. And there was a family of golliwogs in another book. Golliwogs were parody Black people with fuzzy hair.

It's all "grooming", JC. Just different types of grooming.
Are you that detached from reality? The protest outside the elementary school in California happened mostly because it's in an Armenian- American neighborhood. They don't feel, as parents, that raising the issue of abnormal sexuality with kids still playing with toys is appropriate. No sane parent does. It is their right as parents to make that judgment call regarding their own children. It's unnecessary and it's grooming and indoctrination not to mention that it is toxic.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
27,937
5,898
113
But they're not. They're just explaining that Uncle Joe and Uncle Bernie are married like Mom and Dad. And guys marrying each other is legal in CA. So Joe and Bernie probably come over for family barbecues and the kids figure it out anyway.

They're not saying that Uncle Joe fucks Uncle Bernie in the ass.

When I was growing up, every book that a kid ever got in school had a wealthy, white middle class mom and dad who had 2, or 3 or 4 kids. EVERY FUCKING BOOK. There were no gays, no blacks, no poor people. You don't call that "grooming"?

The only Asian character in a kids' book I ever read was some people in the artist's imagination of Chinese traditional dress in Rupert Bear. And there was a family of golliwogs in another book. Golliwogs were parody Black people with fuzzy hair.

It's all "grooming", JC. Just different types of grooming
Again, why not wait with all this LGBTQ stuff until the child is 16 and has reached age of consent??
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,571
6,768
113
At what age do girls start going through puberty, jc?
Are you going to stop that from happening?
No, it's YOUR crowd that's stopping puberty with the puberty blockers. Disgusting.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,899
103,013
113
Are you that detached from reality? The protest outside the elementary school in California happened mostly because it's in an Armenian- American neighborhood. They don't feel, as parents, that raising the issue of abnormal sexuality with kids still playing with toys is appropriate. No sane parent does. It is their right as parents to make that judgment call regarding their own children. It's unnecessary and it's grooming and indoctrination not to mention that it is toxic.
Armenian-Americans, huh?

So that means it's Uncle Aram marrying Uncle Boghos, not Uncle Joe marrying Uncle Bernie. Glad you pointed that out. Makes a huge difference.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,571
6,768
113
Armenian-Americans, huh?

So that means it's Uncle Aram marrying Uncle Boghos, not Uncle Joe marrying Uncle Bernie. Glad you pointed that out. Makes a huge difference.
Are you pretending to be this clueless or were you born that way? The nationality is significant because they happen to be more serious about things you find useless- family and religious outlook. Easier to play a race card than to try for something thoughtful, eh?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,571
6,768
113

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,899
103,013
113
Are you pretending to be this clueless or were you born that way? The nationality is significant because they happen to be more serious about things you find useless- family and religious outlook. Easier to play a race card than to try for something thoughtful, eh?
Actually, they don't. It's just a convenient myth for you to present - the myth of the "traditional, unspoiled, morally pure ethnic group". It's your own form of inverted racial stereotyping.

They have just as many gays as anyone else. And once they move to Canada, those gay uncles are going to be doing things together that they wouldn't do back in the home country where their neighbors would kill them.

Check out what some of the young Middle Eastern guy and girls get up to once they get out of the middle east and hit Canada.
 

dirtyharry555

Well-known member
Feb 7, 2011
2,837
2,327
113

A skinny transsexual called Jacqueline Jane waxes fat on TikTok about his designer vagina. Designer anything, he contends, is always better than the humdrum, off-the-rack item. Therefore, his new “c*ochie,” (his term) is an improved version of an ordinary woman’s lady parts.

It is here that one needs a cultural companion guide to JJ’s unthinking “case” for the superiority of his newly fashioned parts over those of a natural woman.

That America is “experiencing” historically unmatched levels of stupidity should not come as news. Risen to prominence around us is a sub-intelligent underclass of people, sexually straight and bent, whose behavior is grotesque. It is more patent in the female of the species, or in caricatures of it.

We don’t need to be told of the stupidity that saturates our surrounds and floods our senses. Nevertheless, America’s teens, we’re informed “are dumber than they’ve been in 100 years.” “The May-June 2023 issue of Intelligence,” reports Robert Spencer, “finds that young people are experiencing the most significant decline in intellectual abilities: ‘the greatest differences in annual scores were observed for 18- to 22-year-olds.’” Yet another “study by researchers at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine reveals a significant decline in American IQ scores over the past couple of decades.”

An indispensable adjunct of American-style systemic stupidity is PRIDE: We’re loud-and-proud about being handsomely equipped to fail. At least the discredited, unthinking, clownish “scientific community” is not worried about a statistically significant drop in aggregate American intelligence.

From their own sinkholes of stupidity, the bearers of this terrible news assure us that it’s all good. Lower IQs don’t necessarily mean lesser mentation, just a different type of mental equipment. Fatherly magazine is positively fatherly about America’s dropping IQ scores: “It might not be a bad thing.” Yay.

Jacqueline Jane, our trans TikToker, isn’t American. He does show flickers of cerebral life in some of his video clips. As a pathological exhibitionist, however, JJ is likely compelled to cater to his American audience. Of his nearly one million “Likes,” most likely originate in the United States — an internet search reveals that, at 109.54 million, the United States is the country with the largest TikTok audience in the world. (We celebrate our national stupidity and blame China for pervasive American decadence, decades in the making.)

The market might of the American consumer is required in order to enforce extravagant sexual sensibilities and sensitivities state-side and abroad. We now have it on good authority that a sizeable market share in measurable moronity is ours.

It was the whiney Libs of Tiktok that channeled Jacqueline Jane’s supercilious, catty riffs about his new orifice’s superiority. Contra the Libs, this mine-is-better-than-yours tit-for-tat is possible because, to an already propagandized, miseducated, low-IQ population, the zeitgeist now offers only agitprop as a resource on the subject of sex.

Consider: When women like me were Jacqueline Jane’s age, one could read staple facts in the weekly, normie, women’s magazines pertaining to features that made a woman’s anatomy potentially more fantastical than Ali Baba’s cave.

But in the absence of sexually correct scientific literature, or an accessible shared truth, sexual stupidity will prevail. The suppression of once-popular and scientifically correct reading material about female anatomy and sexuality facilitates Jacqueline Jane’s nonsense about his junk. His is ignorance-enabled idiocy.

Our current IT Girl is one Dylan Mulvaney — the transexual face of the Bud Light beer brand, who inadvertently mocks the beverage’s former consumers and womanhood all at once.

This beer baboonery is not Mulvaney’s doing. Ultimately, it’s not this poor waif, this pathetic chimera of a creature, who is at fault here. Rather, it’s a society’s rotten movers and shakers, embedded in institutions political, cultural, and commercial — Anheuser-Busch, in this case — who have invited and encouraged desperately needy souls such as Mulvaney to perform vulgarities on the national stage.

The purpose of the self-anointed cognoscenti is, very plainly, to unseat and insult the American moral majority.

For the World Athletics Council, it’s a bullseye. Your columnist is an avid admirer of track-and-field. I’d sooner watch the relatively unknown new Usain Bolt, named Bouwahjgie Nkrumie, sprint 100 meters under 10 seconds, than spend five minutes spying the larded ball players in their dog muzzles, space helmets, and shoulder pads.

The WAC represents athletes with true grit — who don’t get billions of dollars in contracts and other compensation, who run hundreds of miles without complaint; sprint fastest, swim strongest, and jump highest and furthest. And the WAC has banned trans athletes from female competitions. (The libertarian solution is to hold special games for trans athletes, where like competes against biological like.) Good news for my sports heroes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts