Its offical : Transphobia is here to stay!

Status
Not open for further replies.

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,101
100,147
113
P r o p a g a n d a based on garbage science. The same kind of science that WHO used to remove gender dysphoria from the list of mental disorders in 2019. So, now instead of getting care for a recognizable condition, kids get quacks to remove body parts and fucked them for life with pharmaceuticals.
But they're the doctors, aren't they?.... Not you.

And how many medical professional associations approve gender affirming care, JC?..... Do I have to post that graphic again?
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,571
6,768
113
Except... Frankie just posted proof that it does. 🐸
Yes, over 50 years of real research to be discarded because of a questionnaire...of 100 individuals. You should forward your research to the European medical professionals in Sweden and Finland, and Denmark and even France who are not so sure. Maybe you can convince them. ROTFLMFAO!!!

 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
95,266
24,180
113
P r o p a g a n d a based on garbage science. The same kind of science that WHO used to remove gender dysphoria from the list of mental disorders in 2019. So, now instead of getting care for a recognizable condition, kids get quacks to remove body parts and fucked them for life with pharmaceuticals.
Just cuz your mother is stuck in the past like Rushton doesn't mean that changes aren't good.
Though I expect it must be frustrating to keep thinking the same thoughts you've been thinking for however many decades and getting upset when the world changes around you.
Kind of explains a lot, though.

The study is good, its your mom and your views that are dated and wrong now.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,571
6,768
113
Just cuz your mother is stuck in the past like Rushton doesn't mean that changes aren't good.
Though I expect it must be frustrating to keep thinking the same thoughts you've been thinking for however many decades and getting upset when the world changes around you.
Kind of explains a lot, though.

The study is good, its your mom and your views that are dated and wrong now.
Really, like the "study" you used? A questionnaire of a 100 individuals???? You are a laughingstock, only a much, much more dangerous because, in the end, real minors will get hurt. And it will be irreversible. That's why the European medical establishment stepped on the break.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

curr3n_c1000

I do all my own stunts
Dec 20, 2014
4,034
2,187
113
The ideologue is the one that is against treatment that reduces suicide in non-binary youth by 73%.

Suicide Risk Reduces 73% in Transgender, Nonbinary Youths with Gender-Affirming Care
P r o p a g a n d a based on garbage science. The same kind of science that WHO used to remove gender dysphoria from the list of mental disorders in 2019. So, now instead of getting care for a recognizable condition, kids get quacks to remove body parts and fucked them for life with pharmaceuticals.
But they're the doctors, aren't they?.... Not you.

And how many medical professional associations approve gender affirming care, JC?..... Do I have to post that graphic again?
I told you guys, when it comes to scientific publications, always look for the peer review because researchers will say anything for attention.

I did some digging and it turns out the claims of the study were false or at the very least overstated. Basically they knew treatment methods had little to know affect but still put the article out they way they wanted.


However, UW's characterization of the findings was called into question by independent journalist Jesse Singal, who began emailing questions to researchers in an attempt to gain access to the data used to draw their conclusions.

Researchers did not provide the data to Singal, who later published a lengthy Substack article attempting to poke significant holes in the study's conclusions.
"What’s surprising, in light of all these quotes, is that the kids who took puberty blockers or hormones experienced no statistically significant mental health improvement during the study," Singal wrote in the article. "The claim that they did improve, which was presented to the public in the study itself, in publicity materials, and on social media (repeatedly) by one of the authors, is false."

Singal also raised questions about the statistical approach, which could not be verified without access to the data the researchers used to draw their conclusions. He argued that the inability to verify the data called the "validity of this research" into question.

Fox News has also requested the data used for the study from the university but has not received a response.

Emails between the university and children's hospital staff show that they quickly realized that Singal's article presented them with significant problems, but they remained unsure on how to push back.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,101
100,147
113
Yes, over 50 years of real research to be discarded because of a questionnaire...of 100 individuals. You should forward your research to the European medical professionals in Sweden and Finland, and Denmark and even France who are not so sure. Maybe you can convince them. ROTFLMFAO!!!

I'm pretty happy relying on the AMA, JC.

Ftr_hNMaIAIbKOB.jpg
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,571
6,768
113
I'm pretty happy relying on the AMA, JC.

View attachment 237098
Hey, you want to experiment on your kids? Go right ahead. I'll stick with the Europeans and over half century of real research. It will be fun watching the "medical professionals " scurrying around like cockroaches in light when the lawsuits begin to fly...and nothing to hide behind except idiotic politics. Let the jury selection begin!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,571
6,768
113
I told you guys, when it comes to scientific publications, always look for the peer review because researchers will say anything for attention.

I did some digging and it turns out the claims of the study were false or at the very least overstated. Basically they knew treatment methods had little to know affect but still put the article out they way they wanted.

The treatment and knowledge progression of gender dysphoria is decades old. All the "new" claims are purest form of ideological bullshit like the moronic "study" Franky posted. It's become a part of the culture war with various charlatans offering their "solutions " to a problem that require, in most cases, simple observation and non intrusive psychiatric guidance- absolutely vital during the adolescent years. Instead...I don't even want to go there! Disgusting doesn't begin to describe it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

dirtydaveiii

Well-known member
Mar 21, 2018
7,781
5,569
113
The treatment and knowledge progression of gender dysphoria is decades old. All the "new" claims are purest form of ideological bullshit like the moronic "study" Franky posted. It's become a part of the culture war with various charlatans offering their "solutions " to a problem that require, in most cases, simple observation and non intrusive psychiatric guidance- absolutely vital during the adolescent years. Instead...I don't even want to go there! Disgusting doesn't begin to describe it.
So what makes you think you know more than the AMA ? do you dimiss everything you don't agree with as corrupt and somehow think this proves your right? Just asking for some friends
 

dirtydaveiii

Well-known member
Mar 21, 2018
7,781
5,569
113
I will say it again. The elephant in the room is it results in sterilization of ypung people that is irreversible.
So you better be sure or anyone advocating for this is advocating for eugenics.
You just gave me a brilliant business idea : semi permanent cock removal. Get tired of having a cock ? Have a surgery to remove it but with the option of easily reattaching at a later date if you decide you want to me a man again. Problem solved
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
95,266
24,180
113
Really, like the "study" you used? A questionnaire of a 100 individuals???? You are a laughingstock, only a much, much more dangerous because, in the end, real minors will get hurt. And it will be irreversible. That's why the European medical establishment stepped on the break.
It wasn't a 'questionnaire'.
The study followed 100 kids for a year.

That's reasonable.

And its more science than has ever been in any of your posts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
27,639
55,389
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
Hey, you want to experiment on your kids? Go right ahead. I'll stick with the Europeans and over half century of real research. It will be fun watching the "medical professionals " scurrying around like cockroaches in light when the lawsuits begin to fly...and nothing to hide behind except idiotic politics. Let the jury selection begin!

Their coming for our kids..........This is real!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,571
6,768
113
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

RZG

Well-known member
Mar 4, 2007
872
901
93
I will say it again. The elephant in the room is it results in sterilization of ypung people that is irreversible.
So you better be sure or anyone advocating for this is advocating for eugenics.
That`s about one slip on a banana peel away from the direction of Nazi eugenics, via the way of California earlier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76
Status
Not open for further replies.
Toronto Escorts