His wife sent $5000 to the zionists who attacked Palestine protesters in California.
Jerry Seinfeld was chosen as the commencement speaker at Duke University. Seinfeld is an American Jew - who as far as I know doesn't sit on Israel's war cabinet, serve in the IDF, or have absolutely anything to do with the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza. That didn’t matter to the group of bigoted students who interrupted the ceremony and walked out to protest a Jew being on stage. Shame on every one of them.
Coming from the guy who has ZERO credibility on TERB.Why would anybody believes what mandrill posts in these threads, hammy?
No qualifiers are needed. Especially when not one of your predictions has come to pass.Palestine is not a full member.
Yet.
Wow, the old supremacists are angry today.Coming from the guy who has ZERO credibility on TERB.
You still can't even draw Israel's borders on a map, hammy.No qualifiers are needed. Especially when not one of your predictions has come to pass.
''Disclaimer: The UN has so far not been able to produce independent, comprehensive, and verified casualty figures; the current numbers have been provided by the Ministry of Health or the Government Media Office in Gaza and the Israeli authorities and await further verification. Other yet-to-be verified figures are also sourced.''No they have not.
The May 6th estimate that UN published is reported deaths. The new one published on May 9th include identified deaths as of 30th April.
May 6th:
View attachment 325197
May 9th:
View attachment 325198
With that broken record of a tactic, you've admitted that you have nothing to reply to the fact that that last vote in the UN, that you and the rest of the TERB KKK are having a circle jerk about, means absolutely nothing.Palestine's lack of full membership is irrelevant.
Utter and unadulterated lunacy.The UN, does not have the power to authorize or recognize countries, or determine their borders.
Irrelevant.You still can't even draw Israel's borders on a map, hammy.
That's like saying that OJ is the gold standard for innocence in the murders he committed. They are a bunch of lying terrorists lying.The Gaza Ministry of Health is the gold standard for casualty figures in Gaza.
Maybe you didn't read the article which excoriates the UN for not following its' own standards and protocols and simply parrotting Hamas' numbers.In every conflict prior their figures have been within 2 to 4% of UN numbers (+/-)
Untrue. Provide the source of that claim., Israel relies on these numbers as well and has signed off on these as credible.
I clicked on that link several times and it links to nothing. LOL As such, your claim has no connection to reality.Israeli Intelligence Has Deemed Hamas-Run Health Ministry's Death Toll Figures Generally Accurate
It already was an observer state which gives them the right to watch but that's it. But, as I said, this recent vote has zero impact. Big deal. You can pop it like a balloon.The UN resolution passed recently does not admit Palestine as a full member state, but offers upgraded status to Palestine as an Observer state. It also means 143 countries recognize Palestine as a sovereign state. It is a step in the right direction.
Reading comprehension? LOL I made no reference at all to sovereignty. I was talking only about their status in the UN. Nothing more. What did you read to comprehending something that was not written. Feel free to read until you comprehend. He who laughs last, laughs best.A ludicrous and hilarious lack of reading comprehension. That is not what I said. I said in response to your insinuation that being a UN member state is somehow required for a state to be considered sovereign that that is not the case.
The UN works by passing resolutions, like #1761 in 1962 when their position was that S. Africa was practising apartheid. You have stated that the UN's position is that Israel is conducting genocide. If what you claim is true, where is that resolution? The one from 40 odd years ago has nothing to do with current events. You are providing a very poor education. I demand that you divest yourself from TERB. I have that right. LOL.You have been educated time and again, that, that is NOT how the UN works. The UN is a membership based organization and membership to the UN is not required in order for a state to be a sovereign state. The UN does not have the power to authorize or recognize countries or determine their borders.
Actually it is your claim that is irrelevant. That vote accomplished nothing and Palestine is still not a member just like it wasn't a member before that vote. It was and is a meaningless vote, i.e. the definition of irrelevant. The UN speaks for the world. As such, following the rules established by the UN, the world does not recognize Palestine as a state worthy of admission into their organization.,Therefore, whether or not Palestine is a full member, is irrelevant. What is relevant is that 143 countries out of 193 recognize Palestine as a sovereign state.
That number says 24,000 identified of the 35,000 dead.United Nations halves estimate of women and children killed in Gaza (msn.com)
The United Nations has significantly adjusted Palestinian casualty figures for the ongoing war in the Gaza Strip, halving the number of women and children previously reported killed.
While more than 9,500 women and 14,500 children were reported among the fatalities by the UN’s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) on May 6, two days later that number was revised significantly downward. Today, under 5,000 women and 8,000 children are now officially listed by the UN as casualties.
David Adesnik, director of research at the Washington-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), told the National Post he suspects the discrepancy stems from the UN’s decision to quietly stop using figures provided by the Hamas-run Government Media Office (GMO).
“So you see May 6 and before, the GMO (is listed as a source); all of a sudden, May 8, they don’t cite a source,” Adesnik told the Post over the phone on Sunday. He pointed to the similarity between the new figures and those from a May 2 Gaza Health Ministry (GMH) report as a tip-off suggesting the UN had ditched the media office’s figures in favour of those from the health ministry, “even though they don’t say (the Gaza) Health Ministry in the thing.”
Related video: ‘Israeli actions in Gaza amount to genocide,’ says former PLO legal advisor (Al Jazeera)
“So clearly here we’ve done a switch from GMO’s big number, which never had any clear basis elaborated; like they just offered nothing but their own assertion. Whereas the Health Ministry does more to back its stuff up,” he said.
- Michael Higgins: 'Mass graves' story another vicious Hamas lie
- Rahim Mohamed: Hamas death numbers can't be trusted — here's more evidence they are inflated
The differences between the two datasets was investigated by Gabriel Epstein of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy , an American think-tank, who found in late March they yielded “ wildly different and irreconcilable results, indicating that the media reports methodology is dramatically understating fatalities among adult males, the demographic most likely to be combatants.”
Epstein argued that his analysis of the two Hamas-run institutions “undercuts the persistent claim that 72 per cent of those killed in Gaza are women and children.”
Hillel Neuer, the executive director of UN Watch, an organization that monitors the body’s constellation of agencies, told the Post that the UN’s approach to monitoring Israel and Gaza is unique.
“The UN’s method of reporting deaths in Gaza is the complete opposite of what they do in other conflict situations,” Neuer said, pointing to the UN’s recent efforts in Ukraine where it has established “a defined methodology using individual records of civilian harm, where a standard of proof was met, namely, reasonable grounds to believe that the harm took place.”
Neuer suggested the divergent approach is due to institutional anti-Israel bias plaguing the international community.
“But when Israel can be blamed, it’s the complete opposite. For reporting Gaza deaths, there is no method, and no standard of proof. All the UN does is parrot figures supplied by Hamas, which is laundered and legitimized by the UN as the neutral-sounding ‘Gaza Ministry of Health,’ or ‘Government Media Office,’ when in fact both are run by the Hamas terrorist organization.”
Neuer called the significant update, which was not announced, as an admission “essentially … to have been feeding the media and the world completely false numbers.” The UN Watch leader encouraged the body to take a page out of its own playbook used during the Syrian Civil War , “when the UN Human Rights Office announced it had stopped updating the death toll … because it could no longer verify the sources of information, acknowledging its inability to verify ‘source material’ from others.”
The news comes a month after the Hamas-run Ministry of Health publicly disclosed that more than 10,000 previously reported fatalities had “incomplete data,” lacking basic biographical information such as their names. Such recent developments have cast serious doubts on earlier Hamas claims that 70 per cent of Palestinian casualties in the Israel-Hamas War were either women or children. According to the Times of Israel, the latest revision would bring the ratio of combatants to civilians killed in the conflict to nearly 1:1.
“Either way, the number would be historically low for modern urban warfare,” West Point’s urban war studies chair John Spencer wrote in late March, contextualizing the conduct of Israel’s military operations compared with other recent urban combat theatres such as Mosul, Iraq, in fighting against the Islamic State.
Two days after Spencer’s article, University of Pennsylvania professor Abraham Wyner spoke with the Post explaining a recent analysis of the Gaza Health Ministry he conducted, suggesting that the numbers were largely fabricated by Hamas to fit its political narrative.
“Hamas hasn’t provided detailed data since early in the war. And why should it?” Wyner said via email. “You use what you can.”
National Post
'Not including more than 10,000 reported missing or under the rubble'No they have not.
The May 6th estimate that UN published is reported deaths. The new one published on May 9th include identified deaths as of 30th April.
May 6th:
View attachment 325197
May 9th:
View attachment 325198
Watch this video and tell me how many people are dead judging by the body parts they are pulling out of rubble.''Disclaimer: The UN has so far not been able to produce independent, comprehensive, and verified casualty figures; the current numbers have been provided by the Ministry of Health or the Government Media Office in Gaza and the Israeli authorities and await further verification. Other yet-to-be verified figures are also sourced.''
LOL..Information provided by Hamas..
I educated you why that is. The UN just took the Gazan/Hamas numbers at face value without any attempt at verification.It is a statement of fact that the Gaza ministry of health's numbers is within 2 to 4% of UN numbers in past conflicts.
Your causality is backward. Palestine is not sovereign state because of any UN policy. It is because Palestine is not a sovereign state that they are not recognized by the UN. The reason that they are not a sovereign state is because they rejected the land given to them during partition.You made the comment to me way earlier, that Palestine was not recognized as a sovereign state because it was not a full member
Call it a Pyrrhic accomplishment because in reality it does nothing to forward their cause. Their status has not changed. Being an observer state is still being an observer state.As for this resolution not accomplishing anything, that is false. It provides Palestine with expanded rights that it did not have before. You are free to go read it on wikipedia where they list it, point by point.
Say it as often as you like. All it proves is that you are depleting the world's supply of pretzels.Also as I said multiple times before, no UNGA or UNSC resolutions are required to be adopted for Israels actions to be considered genocide. For one, the Armenian Genocide does not have a corresponding UN resolution even though it is recognized by several countries, along with UN special reports that call it genocide. Similarly, several countries today call Israel's actions in Gaza a genocide, along with the ICJ verdict and the UN Special Report. This proves Israel's actions in Gaza amount to genocide and meets the minimum criteria set forth by the genocide convention.
Resolutions are formal expressions of the opinion or will of UN organs.