Wrong - Hamas and all Palestinians have the right to self defence against an illegal occupation but its a war crime to target civilians, they should be investigated for those acts as should Israel. I am not happy anyone on either side has been killed, BDS and the end of apartheid is what I support, non violent end to the occupation.
Israel has the right to self defense against terrorist attacks, which are war crimes. You continually try to justify the attack of Oct. 7. As such, you support that violence. Your words of non-support of violence ring hollow, as even in this post you somehow seem to think that killing 1,200 civilians is resistance. It was an undeniably cowardly sneak attack that has no equivalency to resistance. It was an act of aggression intended to draw a response from Israel. And now that Israel has responded you complain about it.
Wrong - I support a ceasefire and sanctions to end apartheid. Hamas and Palestinians have a right to self defence given Israel has refused all peace talks and continues to steal their land. But BDS and sanctions is my preference, that's what I support.
Wrong. Hamas has broken every ceasefire, including as recently as a couple of weeks ago when they stopped returning hostages. Claiming that Israel refused peace talks is a lie. Palestinians have rejected every land accord.
And I keep asking, why do you not support a solution of Hamas surrender which
immediately stops the violence. No negotiations required. Why do you support a solution that takes months or years to take effect all the while more Palestinians die. There is absolutely no logic to it unless the strategy is to allow more Gazans to die so that Israel can be further demonized.
Please explain how and why delaying the end of the war is better than ending it immediately. Once again, your words ring hollow. You have NEVER been able to explain how waiting for BDS and protracted negotiations for a cease fire is faster and saves more lives than an unconditional surrender. A Hamas surrender in no way precludes a BDS movement or even delays it. The same goes for negotiations. Supporting your plan is totally irrational. Where is the logic in justifying your stance?
Wrong - you intentionally trying to claim a declaration for freedom and human rights means genocide.
Israeli Arab civilians have equal rights. By definition it means claims of apartheid are patently false.
Wrong - There is no evidence that is happening but there is increasing evidence Israel are again using human shields.
Fail. A classic case of you claiming that reality is a lie. That is your only defense because the documented facts and videos prove you wrong. And it's a joke of a defense.
Wrong - only a ceasefire and negotiations will return the hostages as Netanyahu already proved. He also just shot three hostages holding white flags, clearly he wants them and all Palestinians dead.
Actually, actually, the only thing it proved is that trying to negotiate with Hamas in good faith is an exercise in futility. Hamas broke the agreement by unilaterally stopping the return of hostages. They've broken every ceasefire.
No, I back equal rights for all regardless of race, you back racist, colonialism implemented through apartheid and genocide. Polar opposites, buddy.
There is no apartheid. Arab citizens of Israel have equal rights including being elected members of parliament. There is no genocide since Israel is going after Hamas and Hamas is not a race. They are terror organization. Nobody claimed that going after Isis was genocide.
Your claims are without merit, dude.
www.voanews.com
