It's not real, yet it's s better arrangement than many marriages.
It think that using the dichotomy is helpful because without it, some guys start to believe it is more than just a business transaction.So many people use the real or fake dichotomy when it comes to SPs and have a “Your paying, So therefore, it’s not real.” logic. Everything is real within the boundaries of business.
She never considered you a client but still accepted money? Wonder what her definition of "client" is...This has always been clear for me as I experienced the negative firsthand. I met an SP about 12 years ago and we saw each other frequently, bought each other gifts and we were generous with each other (me with gifts and her with going well over time, sometime all day or an overnighter). Anyway, three years into our "relationship", she found out that I was seeing another SP on a regular basis and she became very angry and felt hurt as though I betrayed her; making me feel as though I was cheating on her. Although, I always known where our relationship stood, I had no idea that she felt this way about me other than being really good friends. In spite of my confusion, she made it clear to me that she never considered me to be a client and didn't think that I was like "all those other men".
.
Ha, I like that. Seems to be fairly accurate.no,
it is a "highly rewarding loyalty program",
Well said.yeah it's always kind of sad to me when i see guys in this world who seem to have no idea what true love and affection is, and how easily they get tricked into thinking that a desire for easy cash equates to real desire.
to answer your question - why get into a "free" relationship when there are guys willing to pay everything for us - there are enough materialistic thots out there who take on this very mentality. professional sugarbabies and the like. they'll only date rich guys who can lavish them with shit, and i guess that equates to love for some of them. it's a bit tragic though, because they'll never know what true love is with that mindset. as someone who has been in love at least a few times, and always in situations where we have been both broke as shit but happy and ready to take on the world together, there are a million reasons to have "free" relationships that aren't predicated on an exchange of money or gifts for sexual attention. if you have to even ask this question, it's clear you've never experienced that. i hope you do one day though. the problem is, you're not going to find her in this world.
That's what I thought as I was always clear that although we really liked each other and cared for each other that we were just good friends, which is why it through me that she was so upset that I was seeing other SPs. She knew I was seeing other SPs in general, but really reacted badly when she knew I was seeing another SP on a "regular basis" as I never hid the fact I was seeing other SPs, I just didn't discuss other SPs with the SP I spend time with in a middle of a session as my attention is strictly with the SP I'm with.If sex is paid for, he's a client. Granted, he's got a better business relationship with her than other clients who pay for social time, but they aren't in a relationship since money is exchanging hands for sex. You could call it a friendship since I'm sure many people here hang out with people whom they pay when the person performs a professional service for them (e.g. lawyer, tradesman, etc.). Had a buddy who did some electrical work and gave a huge discount.
The real test is do they ever hang out and have dinner where he doesn't pay? Do they ever have sex where he doesn't pay? IMO a bit of a blurred line in that when dating, there's many guys who would pick up the dinner tab. I'm guessing though they wouldn't be paying for sex should it occur.
I hesitate to say he's being used. In theory he's saving a ton by not paying for her time but still, not a real relationship with $$ involved.
She never considered you a client but still accepted money? Wonder what her definition of "client" is...