Iran still enriching to 60%

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,924
22,287
113
And as you keep ignoring, they've been a nuclear power since before the NPT and would/will be allowed to keep them even if they sign.

Have you ever asked yourself why your obsession with Israel prevents you from criticizing Iran for violations of the NPT and actions that have no conceivable civilian use?
Why do you want war with Iran so much?
Don't you have enough failed states surrounding Israel, with Syria, Iraq and now Lebanon?
Why do you want another war?

 
Last edited:

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,641
6,771
113
Why do you want war with Iran so much?
...
I see that you are still sticking with your usual tactics, getting absolutely cornered in you immoral, hypocritical views and responding with idiotic accusations.


And no surprise you are trying to blame Israel because numerous Arab states have driven themselves into the ground just like when you try to blame Israel for Iran enriching to 60%.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,924
22,287
113
I see that you are still sticking with your usual tactics, getting absolutely cornered in you immoral, hypocritical views and responding with idiotic accusations.


And no surprise you are trying to blame Israel because numerous Arab states have driven themselves into the ground just like when you try to blame Israel for Iran enriching to 60%.
Again, why do you support war instead of supporting having Iran sign a nuclear treaty that would guarantee they don't build nukes?
Why can't you answer this question?

 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,641
6,771
113
Again, why do you support war instead of supporting having Iran sign a nuclear treaty that would guarantee they don't build nukes?
Why can't you answer this question?

It's a dumb question because the accusations about war are only your attempt to distract from getting caught with your double standard again. After all, it was Iran who walked away from negotiations and you haven't even hinted at condemnation for that (let alone enriching to 60%, hiding nuclear sites, ...)
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,924
22,287
113
It's a dumb question because the accusations about war are only your attempt to distract from getting caught with your double standard again. After all, it was Iran who walked away from negotiations and you haven't even hinted at condemnation for that (let alone enriching to 60%, hiding nuclear sites, ...)
It was the US that walked away from the JCPOA, not Iran.
And the US still won't agree to holding up their end of the deal.

The question remains, why do you want war so badly?

 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,641
6,771
113
It was the US that walked away from the JCPOA, not Iran.
...
Pathetic that you can't even admit that Iran and their disgusting new president walked away from the talks.

I would ask why you want Iran to have nukes so badly but we both know what you want them to do with them.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,924
22,287
113
Pathetic that you can't even admit that Iran and their disgusting new president walked away from the talks.

I would ask why you want Iran to have nukes so badly but we both know what you want them to do with them.
Trump walked away from the JCPOA, not Iran.
Even a diehard hasbara troll would admit as much.

I don't want Iran to have nukes, that's why I support the treaty talks.
Its you that wants war with Iran instead.

Why do you want war so badly?
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,641
6,771
113
Trump walked away from the JCPOA, not Iran.
...
And Iran's crimes against humanity new president walked away from the renewal talks while enriching to 60%, hiding nuclear sites, and backing out of deals they just made with the IAEA.

Of course your "support" treaty talks hasn't found you criticizing Iran for stopping those talks.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,924
22,287
113
And Iran's crimes against humanity new president walked away from the renewal talks while enriching to 60%, hiding nuclear sites, and backing out of deals they just made with the IAEA.

Of course your "support" treaty talks hasn't found you criticizing Iran for stopping those talks.
Biden still refuses to end the rump sanctions.
For some reason he thinks that Iran should sign the JCPOA without the US holding up its end.

Why are you salivating so much over more war?
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,641
6,771
113
Biden still refuses to end the rump sanctions.
...
Hard to do when Iran hasn't been willing to talk. Why would Biden unilaterally end sanctions while Iran is still enriching to 60%?

But I will say todays news is slightly positive. The Iranian president, widely condemned by all your rights groups, says they may return to talks by the end of November.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,924
22,287
113
Hard to do when Iran hasn't been willing to talk. Why would Biden unilaterally end sanctions while Iran is still enriching to 60%?
Why end the sanctions?
Because that's what the US agreed to do in exchange for Iran signing the JCPOA and confirming they weren't building nukes.

You just want war.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,641
6,771
113
Why end the sanctions?
...
Exactly. As long as Iran is enriching to 60%, there is no reason to eliminate those sanctions. The UN imposed sanctions in the first place for much less.

But still wondering why you are okay with Iran's president (who BTW is widely condemned by your rights groups) breaking off talks?

You just want Iran to have nukes so they can bomb Israel.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,924
22,287
113
Yes, the US pulled out of the JCPOA by enacting sanctions and the only way for the JCPOA to be reenacted is for those sanctions to end.

Of course you'd just rather more war and more innocent people dead, rather than a treaty to guarantee Iran doesn't build nukes.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,641
6,771
113
I love that you are so blindly partisan that you refuse to criticize any of your Israel-hating allies.

Iran is enriching to 60%, has hidden sites from the IAEA, has broken agreements they just signed, and called of the talks. Hopefully they will re-enter talks at the end of November but it's pathetically laughable that you keep trying to avoid anything that sounds like criticism of Iran, even though their new president is on the shit-lists of those rights groups you pretend to support.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,924
22,287
113
I love that you are so blindly partisan that you refuse to criticize any of your Israel-hating allies.

Iran is enriching to 60%, has hidden sites from the IAEA, has broken agreements they just signed, and called of the talks. Hopefully they will re-enter talks at the end of November but it's pathetically laughable that you keep trying to avoid anything that sounds like criticism of Iran, even though their new president is on the shit-lists of those rights groups you pretend to support.
Its pathetic that you still support Israel's attacks on Iran that were aimed at stopping them from signing the JCPOA.
You really just want war with Iran and are absolutely against peace and Iran not building nukes.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,641
6,771
113
Its pathetic that you still support Israel's attacks ...
Thread about Iran enriching to 60% and all you can do is bitch about Israel.

You've been forced to accept there is no peaceable use of 60% Uranium, that Iran violated the NPT by having undeclared sites, and Iran walked away from treaty talks under orders from their president (whom your rights groups want tried at the Hague) but still no hint of criticism for them.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,924
22,287
113
Thread about Iran enriching to 60% and all you can do is bitch about Israel.
Yes, because Israel keeps attacking Iran to try to stop them from signing the JCPOA.
But of course you defend this as well because not only do you love apartheid, you want more war as well.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,641
6,771
113
Yes, because Israel ...
As usual.

Do you agree with your rights groups that Iran's president should be facing the Hague?
Do you agree with the UN that Iran has undeclared nuclear sites and refused to explain their existence?
Do you accept Iran's own statements that they walked away from the talks?
Do you agree that Iran's 60% Uranium has absolutely no peaceful use?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,924
22,287
113
As usual.

Do you agree with your rights groups that Iran's president should be facing the Hague?
Do you agree with the UN that Iran has undeclared nuclear sites and refused to explain their existence?
Do you accept Iran's own statements that they walked away from the talks?
Do you agree that Iran's 60% Uranium has absolutely no peaceful use?
Do you agree that a nuclear treaty is better than a war that could become nuclear?

And sure, take Iran, Israel and Hamas to the Hague.
I'm sure you'll agree that everyone should be treated the same way under the law.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,641
6,771
113
Do you agree that a nuclear treaty is better than a war that could become nuclear?
...
Yes, too bad Iran walked away from the talks under orders from their criminal president or there could already be a treaty re-established.

But no surprise your zealotry had you avoid my questions.
 
Toronto Escorts