Steeles Royal

In the 21st century, anti-Zionism means anti-Semitism

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,806
22,230
113
Who got in the way of their target.
Also this month,


Will you admit these are terrorism or are you going to ignore them and pretend Palestinians are incapable of being held culpable for their actions?
'Got in the way of their target'?

That's you trying to label every Palestinian as a 'terrorist' so you can keep justifying killing them and taking their land.
Its just as obvious as your agenda to list every Palestinian attack while ignoring every Israeli attack.

It becomes incredibly obvious when you just go to the B'tselem home page, which lists all attacks on both sides.
You are now clearly backing the side that commits way more 'terrorism' made even worse as its committed to defend apartheid and 19th century colonial settler mandates.

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,806
22,230
113
Hey Franky, terrorism or 'self defence'?
That article is just like every post you make here.
It uses the word 'terrorist' or 'terror' 50 times.

That's all you do here, repeat the word 'terrorist' as much as possible.
I don't see you as any different than the 'settlers' who are carrying out Israel and your goals to colonize Palestine.

Until you support a call for both sides to be held to the law equally, you are acting like these settlers.

 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,597
6,765
113
That article is just like every post you make here.
It uses the word 'terrorist' or 'terror' 50 times.

That's all you do here, repeat the word 'terrorist' as much as possible.
I don't see you as any different than the 'settlers' who are carrying out Israel and your goals to colonize Palestine.

Until you support a call for both sides to be held to the law equally, you are acting like these settlers.

What a surprise, you refuse to condemn terrorism from Palestinians and instead complain that they describe a terror attacks as terrorism. Do you think that he was defending Palestinians from cholesterol when he shot up the burger joint?

And it's pathetic that you still talk about human rights and 'both sides' while completely rejecting that your own rights groups describe attacks like I posted as completely unjustified.


And today has another terror attack for you to pretend is legitimate.
 

Klatuu

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2022
5,808
3,368
113
You keep ticking all the boxes, grandpa. You are a dyed in wool anti Palestinian bigot.

Anti-Palestinian racism is a form of anti-Arab racism that silences, excludes, erases, stereotypes, defames or dehumanizes Palestinians or their narratives. Anti-Palestinian racism takes various forms including:

  • denying the Nakba and justifying violence against Palestinians;
  • failing to acknowledge Palestinians as an Indigenous people with a collective identity, belonging and rights in relation to occupied and historic Palestine;
  • erasing the human rights and equal dignity and worth of Palestinians;
  • excluding or pressuring others to exclude Palestinian perspectives, Palestinians and their allies;
  • defaming Palestinians and their allies with slander such as being inherently antisemitic, a terrorist threat/sympathizer or opposed to democratic values.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,806
22,230
113
What a surprise, you refuse to condemn terrorism from Palestinians
I fully support legit third party investigations into all allegations of 'terrorism', war crimes and crimes against humanity based on legit reports from human rights organizations like Amnesty, HRW and B'tselem.
When those investigations label any act a war crime or terrorism I'll fully support bringing those charged to trial.

Until you support a call for both sides you are the one excusing terrorism and backing war crimes.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Klatuu

Klatuu

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2022
5,808
3,368
113
This is the look grandpa gets when there are posts that demonstrate what is done to Palestinians.

1691022146093.jpeg
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,806
22,230
113
Yes, they went to attack the Samaritan village. Thankfully it had troops guarding it.
That's you projecting, basketcase.
You think all Palestinians are terrorists so can't accept that they a) could be targeting the illegal occupation and b) have the right to self defence.

Meanwhile you refuse to talk about apartheid and why you support it.
But we both know its because of your supremacist views.

 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,597
6,765
113
I fully support legit third party investigations into all allegations of 'terrorism'...
While ignoring when groups like Hamas and PIJ admit they are targeting civilians.

Do you realize how stupid it is that your pathetic racism has you refusing to admit that a guy shooting up a burger joint is a bad thing?

p.s. your 'legitimate third parties' have already declared that Jews in the West bank do not automatically become legitimate targets even though you claim otherwise.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,597
6,765
113
Also apartheid.
...
More bullshit. Violent settlers get the exact same administrative detention.

As usual completely undermines your apartheid claims when not only do Israeli Arabs have the same legal rights as Israeli Jews but Jewish terrorists get treated in the exact same way as Palestinian terrorists (though I don't recall any settlers shooting at police that tried to arrest them)
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,806
22,230
113
While ignoring when groups like Hamas and PIJ admit they are targeting civilians.

Do you realize how stupid it is that your pathetic racism has you refusing to admit that a guy shooting up a burger joint is a bad thing?

p.s. your 'legitimate third parties' have already declared that Jews in the West bank do not automatically become legitimate targets even though you claim otherwise.
If you are so certain of their guilt you should join me in calling for both sides to be investigated and charged where warranted.
Why does the idea of both sides facing the law equally scare you so much?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,806
22,230
113
More bullshit. Violent settlers get the exact same administrative detention.

As usual completely undermines your apartheid claims when not only do Israeli Arabs have the same legal rights as Israeli Jews but Jewish terrorists get treated in the exact same way as Palestinian terrorists (though I don't recall any settlers shooting at police that tried to arrest them)
Your article says they are treated very differently, including the fact that there are 1178 Palestinians under administrative detention and only 4 Israelis, despite the repeated pogroms of late.
Your article also doesn't list any Israeli homes that settlers were forced to destroy, despite so many being illegal settlements.

You just confirmed apartheid.

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,806
22,230
113
By posting facts?

Amazing that you still claim to support peace while promoting violence from Palestinians.
You don't post facts, you post Palestinian hate speech.
Just as you continue to refuse to admit that Palestinians have the right to self defence against an internationally recognized illegal occupation.

This is what you are doing on this board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Klatuu

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,038
2,922
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Palestinian envoy to UK memorializes PFLP terrorist




(July 9, 2023 / JNS)
The PLO’s envoy to the United Kingdom commemorated a Palestinian terrorist over the weekend accused of orchestrating a 1972 attack that killed over two dozen of people at Israel’s international airport.

“Rest in eternal power and peace Ghassan Kanafani,” Husam Zomlot wrote in a Twitter post published on Saturday.

Kanafani was a leading member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine terrorist organization until the Mossad killed him in Beirut on July 8, 1972. Photographic evidence linked Kanafani to the May 1972 Lod Airport massacre, in which terrorists recruited by the PFLP gunned down 26 travelers, including American citizens from Puerto Rico.

“Palestinian diplomat celebrating the terrorist responsible for the 1972 massacre at Ben Gurion Airport which took the lives of 17 Puerto Rican pilgrims, a Canadian tourist and 8 Israeli civilians,” Jaime Kirzner-Roberts, director of policy at the Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center, responded. “Sick. But not surprising.”

In 1973, Lod Airport was renamed in honor of Israel’s first prime minister.

Saturday’s tweet was not the first instance of Zomlot’s extremist positions causing controversy. In February, the PLO representative refused to condemn an attack on a Jerusalem synagogue that left seven Israelis dead, while describing Islamic Jihad terrorists as “refugees” who were “ethnically cleansed.”

He then proceeded to describe Israel as a “colonizer,” “occupier” and “besieger.”

In the past, the Palestinian envoy has also been accused of denying the Holocaust, downplaying rocket attacks on Israeli civilian communities, and defending the Palestinian Authority’s “Pay-for-Slay” policy, in which it pays monthly stipends to terrorists and to the families of slain terrorists.

Palestinian envoy to UK memorializes PFLP terrorist - JNS.org
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,597
6,765
113
If you are so certain of their guilt you should join me in calling for both sides to be investigated and charged where warranted.
Why does the idea of both sides facing the law equally scare you so much?
What a surprise. You condemn Israel based on any tweet but refuse to condemn any Palestinian actions even when your rights groups condemn it.

Why is it you refuse to even admit the posted acts are terrorism? Is it because you don't want anything distracting from your obsessive hatred of Jews in the Middle East or is it because you think Palestinians are incapable of moral behaviour?

And just a reminder, in this thread alone you stated that you think being Jewish in the West Bank makes one a legitimate target because 'how can you tell them apart" (can't recall too many more racist statements recently) and stated you consider all of Israel to be 'occupied territory' where Jews shouldn't be.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,597
6,765
113
Your article says they are treated very differently, ...
I love your butler-like logic.

You claim Israel is apartheid because only Palestinian get administrative detention even though you admit Jews are in administrative detention. You claim Israel is apartheid because Jews have more rights, completely ignoring that 20% of Israelis with those rights are the exact same ethnicity you say is targeted.

Does Israel have systemic discrimination? Yes. We do too.
Do the laws specify that certain ethnicities have lesser rights? Absolutely not (unless you want to admit that Israeli Arabs actually have more rights than Israeli Jews in two areas - for Arabs, military service is voluntary and they are permitted to travel in parts of the West Bank where Jews aren't allowed).

Of course there are plenty of countries, especially in the region that do legally restrict other religions or ethnicities which you don't bat an eye at, even when Palestinians are the legal victims of that abuse. For example, your only comment on Lebanon systemically refusing to give Palestinian refugees and their generations of descendants any rights, access to education, health care, and explicitly bans them from numerous professions but your only comment is to blame Israel for Lebanon's choices.
 
Toronto Escorts