I think terb is starting to die

[auto doctor]

Here:

Recently made a trip to the Arizona/Nevada border to visit a BBD (Big Bloody Dam) named "Hoover". My god, she was magnificent.

She's quite tall, 726.4 feet, and she weighs a lot (I'm not one for estimating, but I'd guess more than 6,000,000 tons) so cowgirl was out of the question. I found a nice cavity near the base and had my way with her. Unfortunately, she just laid there. Zero movement.

MSOG is possible, but your penis starts to chafe because she doesn't lube herself. I'd recommend using Kevlar condoms. DFK was on the menu, but no BBBJ unless you have scuba gear. Oh, and man can she squirt.

I'd recommend seeing her at least once in your life.

For rates/restrictions see http://www.usbr.gov/lc/hooverdam/service/index.html

I thought she was a Dyke???

 

[eyeofthedragon]

That review is just ... dam ... dam ...

 

[The Truman Show]

I thought she was a Dike???

Yeah, but you can stick your finger in this Dyke ...

 

[auto doctor]

Yeah, but you can stick your finger in this Dyke ...

I'm not Dutch but I think fisting might do it.

 

[anselmo]

Terb is dying. I notice that there hasn't been influx of new post what so ever.

Where are all the new dam reviews???

I don't know where you got the inclination to start this thread but if that's what you feel you should consider the following:

1. You have posted only 56 times since August, 2002 or an average of 1.9 posts per month or once every two weeks. It's members like you that contribute to your feelings, so don't throw stones cause you live in a glass house!

2. Do you have facts or just an observation , after all you made 2 posts per month so your observations must be credible right? LMAO.
Read Fred's stats, those are the facts.

3. Are you only talking about reviews in this thread? If so you should be clear cause it appears you are directing your comments about posts in general that are down. If you are talking about just reviews and you think new reviews are lacking, that's a different issue. I think you have contributed your fair share as far as reviews are concerned.

4. Do you think that Terb is dying because very few reviews are being added? If so I don't know what you would consider to be an appropiate number of new reviews each day on this board.

5. In general, this board is not dying, in fact increasing and mainly in all the other sections besides reviews, that's my observation and not a fact.

Sorry to be harsh, but I think your starting post might be misinterpreted by many here.

 

[The Shake]

This thread is closed.

 

[MuffinMuncher]

Maybe this is because she is a "paid" Terb advertiser and it might be a little difficult to review her own ladies and not also be accused of being a shill.

NOW you know why moderators get freebies!

 

[red]

Newbies don't like to post because of being labelled a "Shill"....

don't be such a girlie man- post some reviews

 

[wrong hole]

Terb is dying. I notice that there hasn't been influx of new post what so ever.

Where are all the new dam reviews???

I don't know if Terb is dying....but I did notice something is different...like yesterday when I check terb...in the lounge there was only a page and a half of new postings(normally there's 2 to 3 pages of new posting), in the SC section there was only half a page of new postings(nomally it's a page or page and a half of new postings)...it was also slower in the other sections too, less then normal

 

[sirduke]

I still like terb

I have been coming to terb off and on for quite some time. Admittedly when there was much controversy regarding posts in teh Niagara region my visits to terb decreased significantly. For me there is less and less useful information in the Niagara region because posts about the businest agency there are not allowed.

 

[Berlin]

January 18, 2005 1343
January 19, 2005 1205
January 20, 2005 1036
January 21, 2005 1000
January 22, 2005 793
January 23, 2005 893
January 24, 2005 1209
January 25, 2005 1221
January 26, 2005 1161
January 27, 2005 1078
January 28, 2005 1012
January 29, 2005 793
January 30, 2005 747
January 31, 2005 966
February 01, 2005 959
February 02, 2005 1017
February 03, 2005 968
February 04, 2005 975
February 05, 2005 640
February 06, 2005 794
February 07, 2005 971
February 08, 2005 1165
February 09, 2005 1244
February 10, 2005 1093
February 11, 2005 955
February 12, 2005 637
February 13, 2005 702
February 14, 2005 1071
February 15, 2005 983
February 16, 2005 1012

wow ... that's about 5 an a half inches, my size .

 

[MartiniGirls]

only advertisments

Thats fine for a person like you. You only post advertisments for "MartiniGirls". You don't post reviews. But for reviewers, if you are new, and you had a great experience with a previously un-reviewed girl, and decide to post it, you get the famous "SHILL" statement. Now, most of us know its in good humour, but for those newbies that don't know, it could be a push back not to post or leave the board.

Out of the 66 posts I have made on TERB so far (the last 8 days) about 10 of them have been posting advertisements for our agency. I enjoy the conversations in the lounge that I have contributed on from single-malt, cigars and well......13 year old skanks, LoL. It is a VERY busy job running a 24hour agency, especially being new and doing almost everything between my partner and I. Hey, I make myself cum last night and I was, to quote the famous tucan Sam, GRRRRRRRRRRRRRREAT. .

 

[Berlin]

Hey, I make myself cum last night

and

I was, to quote the famous tucan Sam, GRRRRRRRRRRRRRREAT. .

... wow ...

 

[Sargon]

None of the stats on TERB have gone down recent in months ( post count, overall stats, new registrations, bandwidth usage etc)
Next time, check your facts first before posing a question like this.

As of today, one measure that has not been improved upon for quite some time is "Most users on line" :


Most users ever online was 1713, 12-01-2003 at 11:40 PM


This means you don't have as many people logging on as you used to back in 2003.

___

 

[Cardinal Fang]

As of today, one measure that has not been improved upon for quite some time is "Most users on line" :


Most users ever online was 1713, 12-01-2003 at 11:40 PM


This means you don't have as many people logging on as you used to back in 2003.

___

This was explained by Goober a while ago. The statistic you show is misleading. As a joke Sheik logged in with all his handles from 3 different computers. There were only about 100 users actually logged in.

 

[n_v]

No infux of new posts whatsover ??? What do you mean ?
I am not sure which stats you are looking at. None of the stats on TERB have gone down recent in months ( post count, overall stats, new registrations, bandwidth usage etc)
Next time, check your facts first before posing a question like this.
______________
Post count totals:

January 18, 2005 1343
January 19, 2005 1205
January 20, 2005 1036
January 21, 2005 1000
January 22, 2005 793
January 23, 2005 893
January 24, 2005 1209
January 25, 2005 1221
January 26, 2005 1161
January 27, 2005 1078
January 28, 2005 1012
January 29, 2005 793
January 30, 2005 747
January 31, 2005 966
February 01, 2005 959
February 02, 2005 1017
February 03, 2005 968
February 04, 2005 975
February 05, 2005 640
February 06, 2005 794
February 07, 2005 971
February 08, 2005 1165
February 09, 2005 1244
February 10, 2005 1093
February 11, 2005 955
February 12, 2005 637
February 13, 2005 702
February 14, 2005 1071
February 15, 2005 983
February 16, 2005 1012

Useless stats. No indication on what type of posts were made.

 

[Sargon]

Then perhaps someone should edit that so members are not misled.

 

[Cardinal Fang]

Then perhaps someone should edit that so members are not misled.

1. It was a joke.
2. See number 1

 

[n_v]

Fred and the moderators do not have the time to go and individually count each post under the type of post it is. If you have the time to do so you are more than welcome.

Percisely why posting the post count stat serves no purpose.

Anyone wishing to see the stats is welcome to click on the statistics page at https://terb.cc/stats/ and see for themselves. The stats are constantly being updated 24/7 and its impossible for us to adjust them.
The stats only go back to July because TERB upgraded the servers then. However I`m sure Fred still has the previous years somewhere.

Webstats is not an analytical software solution to derive any conclusions about the usage on this site. SOmething more robust is needed to do that. Take the stats for what they are worth, but make no conclusions or statements about trends based on them.

 

[n_v]

If someone claims the post counts are down, the total post counts tell them otherwise.

The thread starter mentioned the amount of REVIEW posts being down. Fred quoted total posts to state otherwise. That is a useless post as it does not say anything on whether the post count was up or down in REVIEWS.